• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat The Official TCSS Thread

By Gabriele Marcotti

from espnfc.com

You can't escape it: Portugal vs. Wales is all about Ronaldo and Gareth Bale

PARIS -- Let's be clear here. And, hopefully, either not contradict ourselves or figure out a way to live with the contradiction.

Odds are, neither Wales' Gareth Bale nor Portugal's Cristiano Ronaldo will carry their countries on their back to the European Championship. It takes more than one guy. In fact, it takes a village.

Theoretically, it's possible to be a one-man team. But there's been little to suggest it will work out that way in this tournament, based on Ronaldo's form and Bale's role in Chris Coleman's setup. Nope, more than likely, this will be a collective effort.

So why view this semifinal between Wales and Portugal, which takes place on Wednesday in Lyon, through the lens of the two most expensive players in football history? Mainly because it's a study in contrasts and similarities, a chiaroscuro of what we expect from our superstars who also happen to be teammates at Real Madrid.

Begin with the common ground, starting with the transfer fee that took them to the Bernabeu. Depending on historical exchange rates, depending who you believe, depending on bonus structures and agent commissions, one may have been more or less expensive than the other. Or maybe they cost exactly the same.

What we do know is that both cost substantially more than any other footballer in history.

There's also the physical appearance. Tall, long-limbed, freakishly athletic men with proportionately muscular frames, the kind Leonardo Da Vinci might have doodled. Both blessed with quick feet, an eye for goal and prodigious leaping ability not usually associated with guys who start out as wide players. Both with a distinctive "look" that make them stand out among their colleagues.

While Bale and Ronaldo have been highly touted and scouted from a very young age, each had his distinctive moment when he announced himself on the global stage, transitioning into the consciousness of marginal and casual fans.

For Ronaldo, it was the 2004 European Championships. He arrived at the tournament as a young potential game-changer off the bench, the teenager on a host nation filled with top-tier veterans like Deco, Manuel Rui Costa, Simao and Luis Figo. He ended in the Best XI / Team of the Tournament, scoring two goals, delivering two assists and establishing himself as a starter by the third game.

You can argue about Bale's first big moment, but many would choose the two games against Rafa Benitez' Inter Milan in the 2010-11 Champions League. He was 21 at the time and, similarly, Bale's performances for Tottenham underscored just how unplayable he could become. You can find highlights on YouTube but, in some ways, this animation captures the spirit of those nights even better.

i


From there, things tend to diverge. Partly due to injury, partly because he played for smaller clubs before joining Real Madrid, partly because he's Welsh and didn't get to a major tournament until this summer, Bale -- who turns 27 in less than two weeks -- has enjoyed less of the limelight and won substantially fewer trophies than Ronaldo when he was of a similar age. The Portuguese forward had won three league titles, a Champions League, two domestic cups and a Ballon d'Or by the time he turned 27, plus he had played in two World Cups and two European Championships.

There's little question that, in terms of hype and media attention, Ronaldo is bigger than Bale. The Welshman may have officially trademarked his heart celebration, but when it comes to commercial oomph, he's a mom-and-pop affair relative to Cristiano, Inc.

Bale also retains a certain air of mystery -- at least relative to Ronaldo, who is continually dissected in the petri dish of public opinion and seems to thrive in the spotlight, whether it's producing a documentary film about himself or chronicling his adventures with Moroccan-Dutch kickboxer Badr Hari on social media. The fact that he is inextricably intertwined with you-know-who when it comes to actual football doesn't help Ronaldo either. The Messi-Ronaldo dichotomy inevitably means Ronaldo turns off a large chunk of Barca-leaning neutrals.

Bale has no such problems. He bides his time and plays second fiddle to Ronaldo at club level and (bar for an incident in 2014-15, when his agent, Jonathan Barnett, spoke up on his behalf) seems entirely comfortable with it.

We're so used to seeing them in a club context that the Euros has made for a refreshing treat, especially for those a little weary of the predictable dominance of Super Clubs. What might they be like without a star-studded supporting cast ... and without each other?

It's not a knock on Portugal or Wales. This Portugal team, caught in the seams of a generational shift, is perhaps the weakest of the Cristiano-era. With William Carvalho suspended, Ronaldo, Nani, Pepe and Joao Moutinho could be the only starters who made the trip to the 2014 World Cup in Brazil (and Moutinho, of course, was dropped for the last two games). As for Wales, this may be the most talented side in a long time, but, with all respect, it's still Wales, a country that had not qualified for a major tournament since 1958.

What this means for both Bale and Ronaldo is that not only do they need to take on the usual burden of leadership and stardom, they also have to do it while surrounded with players who are nowhere near as gifted as the teammates they're used to. Simply put, they have to give more. A lot more.

And, so far, that's what they've done. Bale may have been Wales' best player, but he has also proved invaluable at making those around him better, which is what you expect from your superstar. His movement, passing and selflessness have helped turn his full-backs into legitimate wide threats, Joe Allen into someone who doesn't make the "Welsh Xavi" comparison sound quite so blasphemous and Aaron Ramsey (who is suspended against Portugal) into a driving force from the middle of the park. And, of course, Hal Robson-Kanu into a guy who can deliver a Cruyff-like turn and score the kind of goal they'll be talking about for ages.

Ronaldo has had a more difficult time making his teammates better during this tournament for a number of reasons. For a start, his task is different. He's effectively been asked to be the offensive terminus and provide the goals, with the rest of the team at his service. He's done it intermittently, missing chances you'd expect a man who has scored more than 350 goals for club and country in the past six seasons to bury in the back of the net. When the goals don't go in, it's tougher for Ronaldo -- in this role -- to make himself useful: he can't start rampaging around the midfield, or run himself into the ground chasing fullbacks, leaving the frontline unmanned. All he can do is sit, find space in the box and trust that his teammates will deliver chances.

Actually, that's not quite right. He can do more, but it's stuff we don't normally see, though we did get a glimpse during the penalty shoot-out against Poland. Ronaldo took it upon himself to talk to Moutinho and get him to take a penalty. Not that Moutinho is some kid; he's a guy who has played for Portugal for the past 11 years and boasts 88 caps. He's meant to be one of the leaders of this team, but he was dropped from the starting XI after a poor group stage and was low on confidence. This is what leaders do. This is what Cristiano did.

If Wales and Portugal have arrived this far, to the semifinals of Euro 2016, make no mistake, a lot of it is down to Bale and Ronaldo. And not just for what they've done on the pitch, but for what they've done -- and come to symbolize -- off it, in the privacy of the training camp.

Teams like these don't get this far on the back of superstars. They do it on the backs of leaders of men and 23 minds acting as one.
 
No matter what you may think of Ronaldo, his heading ability or rather the distance he can jump off the ground is truly impressive.
 
No matter what you may think of Ronaldo, his heading ability or rather the distance he can jump off the ground is truly impressive.

Portugal play very boring football in friendly competitions. It's the final so it's expected that Portugal will give 110%. France or Germany will be waiting for them. :rolleyes: On paper, France has never beaten Germany in a major tournament but like Germany vs Italy, hoodoo can be broken.
 
Apparently Mesut Ozil sent a text to Arsenal team mate Laurent Koscielny that Germany are not Iceland. :D
 
This is the only game Portugal won in normal time.
KNS, give me the chance to be the first one to coin the word Crexit also cannot.
Nevermind,I lun you until the world cup.
 
This is the only game Portugal won in normal time.
KNS, give me the chance to be the first one to coin the word Crexit also cannot.
Nevermind,I lun you until the world cup.

CRexit = Cristiano Ronaldo exit? You can use it when he leaves Real Madrid. :D
 
By Gabriele Marcotti

from espnfc.com

Low and Deschamps seek to outwit each other in Germany-France semi

Sometimes a manager's job is dead easy. You coach your guys, figure out your best XI, tell them how you want to play, and your job is pretty much done, other than perhaps making the odd substitution.

And sometimes it's an agonizing cycle of doubt and self-doubt, a game of checkmarks in hypothetical pro and con columns in your mind, knowing that for every choice there's an opportunity lost.

Didier Deschamps and Joachim Low are in this latter category ahead of the heavyweight clash between France and Germany in Marseille on Thursday (ESPN, 3 p.m. ET) in the Euro 2016 semifinals. They have the deepest squads in the tournament and the most tactical variations. What's more, Low will definitely have to change his Germany side, and Deschamps will probably need to do the same with France. That sets up a whole realm of possibilities.

For Germany, Mats Hummels is suspended because of card accumulation. Sami Khedira and Mario Gomez are out with injuries, although Low confirmed that Bastian Schweinsteiger is fit and will start. The first question for Low, though, is whether to retain the back three employed in the quarterfinal against Italy, or to revert to the 4-2-3-1 used previously in this tournament. If it's the former, you'd imagine Shkodran Mustafi or, perhaps, Emre Can coming in at the back. Mustafi is a better defender, but Can is better on the ball and is better-equipped to do some of the things Hummels does in terms of building play when teams press Toni Kroos, the main midfield playmaker. And if it's a straight back four, Low will pick his replacement from Mustafi or Benedikt Howedes.

The popular narrative is that Low opted to go 3-5-2 against Italy to simply mirror Antonio Conte's side and neutralize his system, so a back four is more likely. Unless, of course, Low wanted to mess with Deschamps' head and throw him an entirely different look, or be better-equipped to face the front duo of Antoine Griezmann and Olivier Giroud.

Julian Weigl or Can are the obvious Khedira replacement options, but that's not entirely straightforward either. Weigl gives you more defensive cover, which is important if you're looking to help the centre-backs with Griezmann while containing the midfield runs of Blaise Matuidi, Paul Pogba and Dimitri Payet cutting inside.

i


But it's further up the pitch that things get tricky. Low can play Thomas Muller at centre-forward, even though he's had a humdrum tournament and actually has never scored in the Euros (a streak extending to 10 games, which reads like a major statistical anomaly when you consider how prolific he is in the World Cup). Or Low can go back to Mario Gotze up front, except it was his poor form in the group games that led to Gomez's emergence in the first place. Gotze has scored once in his last 11 outings with Germany, which rather mirrors his output with Bayern Munich (three in 14 in the Bundesliga).

If Low goes 3-5-2, he kind of has to play both up front, a factor which probably makes the back four option more realistic. And if it is some version of 4-2-3-1 (Muller and Gotze can both play up front or in the line of three) you'd assume the other two slots will belong to Julian Draxler and Mesut Ozil. Unless, that is, Low decides to throw a curveball, like Andre Schurrle or, better yet, the lightning-quick Leroy Sane. However, Sane only has three caps to his name, none of them in a competitive match, so it would be quite a baptism of fire.

Those are the most realistic permutations. It's tough enough to tell what makes the most sense from afar, but it's especially mind-bending when you consider that the "right" approach will be dependent on what Deschamps pulls out of his tactical hat. Thus far, the France manager has changed formation in each of Les Bleus' five games, and you'd expect him to do the same in the semifinal. Sixteen of his 20 outfield players have had a start, but he has obviously struggled to find the right combination in a team that, before the Iceland game, had been in the lead for only 30 minutes (plus injury time) in four matches.

Deschamps was beaming after that first half against Iceland when France raced to a 4-0 lead. But he probably knows he can't replicate that formation -- a 4-4-2 with Griezmann and Giroud up front, Payet and Moussa Sissoko wide, and Pogba and Matuidi central -- against Germany. You can get away without a specialist defensive midfielder against an exhausted Iceland side that defend deep, but against Low's crew and their incessant ball movement it's asking for trouble.

This would suggest that N'Golo Kante, who was suspended against Iceland, will be back in for Deschamps. Kante has the work rate and the mentality to disrupt the passing in the final third. But if you do that, you're rather forced to play a midfield three -- unless you're going to drop either Pogba or Matuidi, which would be silly at this stage -- and that means going either 4-3-3 or 4-3-1-2, with Payet in the hole.

That may be the most rational, predictable France setup, but it could also be problematic, depending on what Low pulls out of the hat. And Deschamps, as we've seen, is not averse to tweaking his scheme to get an edge. That could mean resurrecting Kingsley Coman or Anthony Martial, or finding a way to accommodate Sissoko (an extra, big, athletic body) to congest the area in front of the back four.

Options galore, then, for both managers. With choice comes the temptation to think outside the box, to exploit the element of surprise. But there's also a greater chance of getting it wrong, of fixing something that isn't broken. Perhaps that's the wrong analogy. Perhaps it makes more sense to think of a team as a tool for a specific task. If it's broken, sure, you fix it. But sometimes, even when it's working, depending on the specific task at hand, you may want to redesign it so it's even more efficient.
 
i


Mesut Ozil has been texting some of his Arsenal teammates ahead of the France clash. :D
 
Germany 0-2 France

Ha! We mirrored the same formation as Die Mannschaft but the better team won! Next we are going to show peacock and company that it's heartbreaking to be runners up and that they would have preferred to be booted out early in the tournament. :D
 
Ha! We mirrored the same formation as Die Mannschaft but the better team won! Next we are going to show peacock and company that it's heartbreaking to be runners up and that they would have preferred to be booted out early in the tournament. :D

Don't be so nasty to peacock, you may be his team-mate next season and maybe clean his boots. :D
 
Sweet revenge for the 1982 WC and one of the worst fouls in International footballing history.

Schumacher should have been banned. Still painful to watch 34 years later.

[video=youtube;1UnMBH3EGWM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UnMBH3EGWM[/video]
 
By Gabriele Marcotti

from espnfc.com

Portugal and France can write their own script in the Euro 2016 final

PARIS -- Tournament finals are the last chapter of a narrative. Unlike league football, there really is no Brooklyn Dodger-esque "wait till next year" vibe. Next year isn't next year -- it's two years from now, and, given the nature of the international game, odds are that much of each team will be different, most likely with a new manager too.

It will not be hard, then, for the two coaches involved in Sunday's final -- Portugal's Fernando Santos and France's Didier Deschamps -- to find the right psychological hooks to make their teams match-ready. The tale is largely written. But there is a chance to determine the ending, and that's a luxury you rarely get -- in sports or in life.

Both can tell their players that, while they might not have been the best team in the tournament, the fact that they're here suggests they might be the hungriest and most tough-minded. Never mind to what degree it's true; focus instead on what it means.

If games finished in the 88th minute, neither of these teams would have won a single match in the group stage. Take France's 2-0 semifinal wins vs. Germany out of the mix and the highest-ranked sides these teams have actually beaten are Romania, 22nd in the world and 2-1 losers to France, and Wales, clocking in at No. 26 and beaten 2-0 by Portugal in the last four.

Or move to another, admittedly more subjective, vantage point and ask how long in this tournament has either side spent playing great football on the front foot.

At the risk of sounding harsh, for France you might highlight a half vs. Republic of Ireland and Iceland respectively and maybe the opening minutes against Germany. For Portugal, there were flashes in the group stage and against Wales.

It's not that the rest has been poor -- well, some of it has -- but rather that the success of both teams has been more about effort, grit, teamwork and difference-making individuals stepping up, mainly Renato Sanches and Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal and Dimitri Payet and Antoine Griezmann for France.

Let's be clear: This in no way diminishes the achievement of either side. But Ronaldo's words after the Wales win -- rather than being a throwaway comment -- take on a greater significance: "It did not start as we wanted. But this is not a 100-meter sprint. It's a marathon."

Sports psychology types like to talk about "visualizing" success, and presumably managers do it too. It's safe to say neither Santos nor Deschamps visualized they'd get this far with their particular setup.

Or, in the case of Deschamps, several setups. The French manager has made tactical or personnel adjustments in every game, except for the Iceland match, where he was 4-0 up at half-time. Just four of his starters in the tournament opener against Romania -- Hugo Lloris, Bacary Sagna, Laurent Koscielny and Patrice Evra -- have retained their place throughout the tournament.

It's a similar story with Santos. Five of the 11 who started in the opener against Iceland likely won't be starting against France; Ronaldo, Nani and goalkeeper Rui Patricio are the only ones to have been named in the starting lineup for every match.

Would both managers have made so many changes if everything had been going swimmingly?

Would they heck.

Both have had the humility to place their trust in guys who were either on the fringes or not even professionals a year ago.

Payet was a 29-year-old who could not gain the trust of successive France managers. Indeed, before this tournament he had played 90 minutes just twice for Les Bleus. Sanches had played one minute of top-flight football before last November. It's fair to say that, without these players, neither side would be in the final.

Both teams have endured periods in which they dominated and created plenty of chances only for their finishers -- Olivier Giroud and Ronaldo -- to let them down. But both persevered and, while it was a bit of a no-brainer for Santos to stick with Ronaldo, the same can't be said for Deschamps: He did have other options, from Andre-Pierre Signac to Anthony Martial to Kingsley Coman.

Both have also had games in which they played poorly and an individual star went supernova to save them: usually Griezmann or Payet for France, Ronaldo or Sanches for Portugal.

Both have put in sterling defensive performances at different times, often led by unsung veterans: Pepe and Laurent Koscielny come to mind.

Both have stared disaster in the eye. In the round of 16, France went a goal down to Ireland and the Lyon crowd was getting restless, whereas Portugal fell behind three separate times to Hungary in the final round of group games and lived to tell the tale.

i


France don't just have home support; they are the more gifted side from top to bottom, blessed with a range of solutions, especially in attack. Historical precedent, if you buy into it, plays in their favour too: They won their past two tournaments on home soil -- Euro '84 and the 1998 World Cup.

They know they can play better--- much better -- than they did in the past three halves of football, and it's a natural pressure point for Deschamps to hit. (Though, to be fair, he probably ought to shoulder a fair part of the blame for any poor play against Germany as well.)

Portugal, meanwhile, have proved themselves to be furiously, maddeningly resilient. At 3-to-1, they have more Champions' League winners than the French, if that means anything. They too can kick it up a notch, though probably not as much as Deschamps' crew, unless Ronaldo is in Superman mode.

It's tempting to conclude this final will be a typically tight, grind-it-out game. France have all the pressure of the world on them and, given the way they're set up, they can afford to wait for a set piece or a Griezmann run on the break.

Portugal have looked best when they've outworked the opposition and defended as a unit. It's the formula that got them past Croatia and Poland and, on paper, there's little reason for them to deviate from the script.

And yet if there's one thing the semifinals reminded us, it's that goals can come at any time and in any circumstance. An early one at the Stade de France could radically change the blueprint, and there is enough individual talent on both sides for this to happen. So maybe an early gamble, from either side, might not be such a bad idea.

The book has been written, bar the ending. Odds are we won't see many of these guys -- from Evra to Sagna, from Pepe to Ronaldo -- in another major international tournament final. What you can be sure of is that every last one of those involved will want to make this count and leave nothing on the pitch. Just as they've done throughout this tournament.
 
By Julien Laurens

from espnfc.com

France on brink of history with Didier Deschamps' men one step from glory

A decade after losing the World Cup final to Italy, France compete in the title game of another big tournament, taking on Portugal in the Euro 2016 final in Paris. For followers of the national team, 10 years can feel like both a long and short time. It feels long because between 2006 and 2016, French football went through a turbulent period, with crisis following an abject 2010 World Cup, followed by the team's recent redemption.

But it also feels short. Back in 2006, it was the end of the Zinedine Zidane generation, and many fans thought it would take another 25 years for the team to get its next big star, one capable of bringing another trophy to the country like Michel Platini did at Euro '84 and Zidane did at the 1998 World Cup and Euro 2000.

If France beat Portugal in Sunday's final, it will be the success of the Antoine Griezmann generation. After a great season with his club, the Atletico Madrid striker is on another planet at the moment. He has scored six goals in six games in the tournament. Apart from Platini, who netted nine times back in 1984, no one has ever scored as many as Griezmann in the history of the European Championship.

Although "Grizou" won't be thinking about it, the Ballon d'Or is also at stake in this final. If the Frenchman succeeds, he will have a huge chance to win the prestigious trophy as best player in European football. If Cristiano Ronaldo delivers, giving Portugal their first trophy, he is certain to get another Ballon d'Or. Paris pits "CR7" against "GR7."

The mood is great in the French camp. Their 2-0 victory against Germany in the semifinals has lifted the confidence of Didier Deschamps and his players. They were dominated for most of the first half but kept working hard, stayed strong together and took advantage of the Germans' mistakes.

After the match, in the Stade Velodrome dressing room, Deschamps told his players he was proud of them, but there was still a final to be won. As the saying goes, "You don't play a final, you win it."

Deschamps is a specialist in winning, and his players want to emulate him. Without being overconfident, Les Bleus are convinced they will beat the Portuguese like previous France teams did in the 1984, 2000 and 2006 semifinals. Each game was dramatic, with France coming back to win in extra time in Marseille (3-2) in 1984; with Abel Xavier's handball and Zidane's golden goal penalty (2-1) in 2000; and with another Zidane penalty in 2006 (1-0).

France have also won their last 10 encounters against Portugal, which psychologically will be a big advantage. On Saturday evening, when the French squad left Clairefontaine, hundreds of fans were waiting to cheer them on at the side of the road and all the way to their hotel in the centre of Paris.

According to sources inside the camp, the players are relaxed. They don't feel the pressure so much -- just like before the Germany game. They are aware of the importance of the occasion, obviously, but they have been very strong mentally throughout the tournament.

They had one objective at the start -- to win -- and they are almost there. They learned a lot from the two first games, against Romania (2-1) and Albania (2-0), where expectation and pressure got to them. At the same time, Deschamps has found a winning formula with a 4-4-2 formation with Griezmann and Giroud up front.

The coach is usually conservative, hence the use of the 4-3-3 for most of his time with the national team. However, he is also pragmatic. Considering Griezmann's form, Deschamps decided to adapt his system around the Atletico man and not the other way round. So the 4-4-2 is here and for the third game running, France's starting XI will be unchanged.

It means Samuel Umtiti could win the European Championship in only his third appearance for his country. After facing Thomas Muller in the semifinal and keeping him quiet, Umtiti will now hope to nullify Ronaldo. The Barcelona-bound defender is not scared, though. At only 22, his maturity is impressive. Three years ago, he won the Under-20 World Cup along with Paul Pogba.

On Sunday night, they could become kings of Europe. The whole country has faith in them and has fallen in love with this very likeable French squad.

If Deschamps' men prevail, the celebrations will be very special all around France, but none more so than in Paris. Indeed, this final is much more than just a football match. Les Bleus can win the Euros not only for their country, but also for all the people who lost their lives in the terrorist attacks in the capital in 2015.

A nation awaits.
 
By Michael Cox

from espnfc.com

Euro 2016 final, France vs. Portugal, set to be a tough, tactical battle

In a tactical sense, the final is rarely the most fascinating game of a major international tournament. It's usually a tight and tense, but not particularly tactical, contest between two sides playing cautiously, waiting for the opposition to make a mistake rather than prompting it through clever strategy.

In all probability, we've probably seen the most interesting tactical battles from Euro 2016: Italy's 2-0 second-round win over Spain, their subsequent 1-1 draw with Germany at the quarterfinal stage, and Germany's 2-0 defeat to France on Thursday.

Those three matches will be as good as this tournament gets. Nevertheless, Sunday's Euro 2016 final promises to be an intriguing clash between two sides, France and Portugal, who are individually interesting for very different reasons.

France coach Didier Deschamps hasn't entirely worked out his optimum system throughout this competition, chopping and changing between two very different setups, while Portugal manager Fernando Santos has stuck to roughly the same, highly unusual shape throughout. France are the favourites for this final, but tactically speaking, Deschamps is likely to be the more reactive manager.

Portugal essentially use a four-man defence in conjunction with a midfield diamond, an approach none of the other 23 teams in this competition used as their default system. More specifically, it's a 4-1-3-2 rather than a 4-3-1-2, with holding midfielder William Carvalho stationed solidly in front of the defence, leaving Joao Mario, Adrien Silva and Renato Sanches to push forward, drifting around into pockets of space.

Unfortunately, that trio has drifted into the same pockets of space too frequently throughout this competition. Their fluidity in the 1-1 quarterfinal victory over Poland was particularly baffling, with all three showing flashes of invention but rarely actually combining to play around opposition midfielders. At times, the freedom afforded to that trio means Portugal's structure in possession is awful, inviting teammates to play around the opposition's block rather than actually play through it, and there's an incredible lack of genuinely good passing moves, especially for a side that features so many talented passers.

i


There's also something peculiar about how Portugal are so passive without possession, dropping back into their own half rather than looking to press, despite the use of lots of young, energetic midfielders. And also, for that matter, it's strange that Portugal are trying to play on the counterattack but aren't actually very good at attacking transitions, and haven't remotely got the best from Cristiano Ronaldo on the break, despite the Real Madrid attacker being arguably the most devastating counterattacking player football has ever seen.

Nevertheless, Ronaldo and fellow winger-turned-striker Nani have been hugely effective in the penalty area at this tournament. Portugal's second goal against Wales was somehow typical of their tournament: Ronaldo's scuffed shot diverted home by Nani's outstretched leg. It owed little to design, but somehow it worked.

Portugal will particularly fancy their chances of getting players between the lines if Deschamps again eschews a defensive midfielder, as was the case for the 2-0 semifinal victory over Germany.

Wednesday's score line flattered France: they were outplayed for long periods and had no obvious plan for stopping Germany's two major playmakers, Toni Kroos and Mesut Ozil. Kroos went free because France's two forwards did little defensive work, seemingly because of fatigue, and when Paul Pogba and Blaise Matuidi moved forward to press, Ozil found space in behind. On paper, that should play perfectly into Portugal's hands with this diamond midfield.

It's not unthinkable that Deschamps might revert to the 4-3-3 with the reintroduction of N'Golo Kante, although this would mean Antoine Griezmann being forced to play from the right. That would waste the tournament's star man in a position where he's clearly less influential, although Deschamps might reason that with France likely to dominate possession for long periods, Griezmann can drift inside from the right into positions close to Olivier Giroud anyway.

Like their opponents, Portugal may also fancy their chances of getting players between the lines. William Carvalho, set to return in place of Danilo, protects the defence effectively but will probably be incapable of stopping two players in that zone. If Dimitri Payet drifts inside to join Griezmann, with the threat of Paul Pogba and Blaise Matuidi bombing forward too, Carvalho could be overloaded. Portugal's midfield diamond tends to squash back into a flat four when they spend long periods out of possession, but if France pass the ball quickly, they can expose this weakness.

Both sides' full-backs might also be crucial in an attacking sense. Neither side fields natural wide midfielders: Portugal use their diamond midfield, while France use two players who prefer playing centrally. Portuguese duo Cedric Soares and Raphael Guerreiro have supported Portugal's passing well, retaining width in the final third, but haven't made decisive contributions in open play by getting to the byline often enough.

Patrice Evra and Bacary Sagna have grown in importance throughout this tournament, initially seeming to be France's weak link but turning in impressive displays against Germany in the semifinal. Their attacking may force Portugal's midfield to become stretched, creating gaps for France to play through. Sagna, however, must be wary of attacking too much, for fear of leaving Ronaldo space on the outside of Laurent Koscielny.

For all the talk about systems and possession, however, there's a good chance that set pieces will be crucial here. Portugal's opener in the semifinal victory over Wales came from a corner, as did the crucial penalty won by France in their win over Germany. If either side scores from a dead ball situation, it has an excellent chance of lifting the trophy.
 
This is one hell of a boring match. It needs a goal to liven things up!

The high point so far is the Peacock getting stretchered off!
 
This is one hell of a boring match. It needs a goal to liven things up!

The high point so far is the Peacock getting stretchered off!

Boring Portugal should have beaten Wales in ET or penalties, then they will go down in history as draw kings drawing all the way to the finals! :D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top