- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Messages
- 5,769
- Points
- 48
I don't intent to discuss the huge subject on Democracy itself today. But I have to use the example of Thailand mentioned in this thread and Taiwan to show just one of the very serious problems of Democracy.
# Democracy is a terrible solution in the event that a strong controversy divided a nation drastically, that regardless of result of repeated polls, the people will still strongly oppose each other and with strong wills want to fight all the way paying huge long term price including lives.
e.g. Thailand's current situation.
e.g. Taiwan's independence issue.
Democracy is workable only in the opposite situation, where by conflicts are not so intense, and compromise were acceptable and could last sufficiently well. After a democratic process e.g. poll the minority compromised and accepted the majority in peace.
Peace is another aspect.
In the event that people are neither willing to pay the price of blood and death, nor settle their strong disagreements with each other for the long term. Instability will become LONG LASTING CRISIS, and people will have to spent huge total amount of resources just to fight each other.
In some cases more than half the nation's GDP will go into internal fighting e.g. Harmas / Hisbollah, in other cases huge proportion of GDP can go into the same thing for many decades - East / West Germany & North / South Korea & India / Pakistan / Sri Lanka / Bangladesh.
Comparatively, Chinese settled between KMT / Communist in a relatively shorter time in control of mainland via a civil war, costing lives & blood but less in total length of time and accumulated GDP. In comparison, PRC + Taiwan had in all these decades accumulated much more in total GDP spent in effort of re-unification with Taiwan than the brief civil war with KMT to control mainland.
My point here is: Democracy & Peace can become long lasting plus costly pains in the ass as well, thus I don't blindly believe in these ideas, pros & cons exists and it is untrue to say that Democracy & Peace are definitely right or preferable, it really depends.
Some disputes are never settled and peace imposed in certain places such as region around Jerusalem are just time awaiting for the next war.
I may view war & peace similar to Yin 阴 & Yang 阳, they co-exist in rotation, taking different places (like days & nights on different sides of planet earth) one can never replace another, one can never substitute another, and none can exist alone for eternity. There isn't anything too wrong about war nor anything absolutely right about peace, and confusion as well as argument exist because only of limited minds of human.
In this fight I think I am driven by warm and passioned heart but applying hard cold and brutal tactics. Chinese say 本菩萨心肠施霹雳手段。 According to what I learn from Chinese history, this is necessary and I know no other way that will work more effectively.
# Democracy is a terrible solution in the event that a strong controversy divided a nation drastically, that regardless of result of repeated polls, the people will still strongly oppose each other and with strong wills want to fight all the way paying huge long term price including lives.
e.g. Thailand's current situation.
e.g. Taiwan's independence issue.
Democracy is workable only in the opposite situation, where by conflicts are not so intense, and compromise were acceptable and could last sufficiently well. After a democratic process e.g. poll the minority compromised and accepted the majority in peace.
Peace is another aspect.
In the event that people are neither willing to pay the price of blood and death, nor settle their strong disagreements with each other for the long term. Instability will become LONG LASTING CRISIS, and people will have to spent huge total amount of resources just to fight each other.
In some cases more than half the nation's GDP will go into internal fighting e.g. Harmas / Hisbollah, in other cases huge proportion of GDP can go into the same thing for many decades - East / West Germany & North / South Korea & India / Pakistan / Sri Lanka / Bangladesh.
Comparatively, Chinese settled between KMT / Communist in a relatively shorter time in control of mainland via a civil war, costing lives & blood but less in total length of time and accumulated GDP. In comparison, PRC + Taiwan had in all these decades accumulated much more in total GDP spent in effort of re-unification with Taiwan than the brief civil war with KMT to control mainland.
My point here is: Democracy & Peace can become long lasting plus costly pains in the ass as well, thus I don't blindly believe in these ideas, pros & cons exists and it is untrue to say that Democracy & Peace are definitely right or preferable, it really depends.
Some disputes are never settled and peace imposed in certain places such as region around Jerusalem are just time awaiting for the next war.
I may view war & peace similar to Yin 阴 & Yang 阳, they co-exist in rotation, taking different places (like days & nights on different sides of planet earth) one can never replace another, one can never substitute another, and none can exist alone for eternity. There isn't anything too wrong about war nor anything absolutely right about peace, and confusion as well as argument exist because only of limited minds of human.
In this fight I think I am driven by warm and passioned heart but applying hard cold and brutal tactics. Chinese say 本菩萨心肠施霹雳手段。 According to what I learn from Chinese history, this is necessary and I know no other way that will work more effectively.
Last edited: