- Joined
- Sep 11, 2010
- Messages
- 37,998
- Points
- 113
Yep, the US did it all to protect itself, shape geopolitics, and to ensure they remain the most powerful nation on earth. Heck, they'll even sanction assassinations on foreign land, but I have no objection when islamic terrorists are the target. Anyway when the net effect is peace and no war, yes all of us are ok with that.This doesn't accurately reflect how much money was made by the US. All that stuff resulted in full employment during the war and round the clock factories. All that is GDP. Discounted or "no cost" is a red-herring. The result was they had a strong economy while Europe was in shambles and had a leg up post war AND a cash stream to count on. It worked so well for them that they decided to engage in multiple wars after that. A far cry from the pre-war policy. Korea, Vietnam and the ME. With each one succeedingly being less profitable and more costly.
Bottom line no matter the minor details is that the US benefited from overseas involvement by numbers far exceeding their inputs with a few serious miscalculations. They didn't do it out of the goodness of their hearts no matter how they sell it.
yes. dumbest act I've seen in my life from a "leader".
The result was they did improve the world, but make no mistake, what actually got them up in the morning was self-benefit. I don't mind. It was still a better place. Until an orange baboon and his legion of losers came along.
Like I said before, we know the trump administration wants to steer itself away from being a global interventionist and from being the world's policeman (because it's costing them too much money aka less profitable like you mentioned), it can simply engage their allies in dialogue and aid in the transition. Don't need to be so arrogant, obnoxious and downright despicable. By doing so, they are showing up their behaviour and reinforcing the view that people who hate the US have held all along.
In my book, the canadians have always been the nicer North Americans.
