This guy is really is dishonest or he can't read english. Lets take this first point that he makes. No one claimed that he was a powerful PAP Branch secretary for 30 years. The claim was that he was PAP Branch secretary. It is the highest ranking post PAP political post after MP in a constitutency.
Could he point where the claim that he was a branch secretary came for 30 years from?
"In course of 30 over years, while drawing easy income in view of its captive market, this guy never uttered a single word, never even farted in a wayward way. "
This guy is truly knows how to twist and lead the gullible ones by the nose.
Will deal with the comments later. Just imagine, first line and he is already fudging.Was he
1) not PAP branch secretary, the chairman of CCC etc in Marine Parade
2) that he worked in NTUC for 30 years which any imbecile knows is a PAP organisation.
3) Did he complain before his retirement
4) Was NTUC not given access that others did not get
Could he point where the claim that he was a branch secretary came for 30 years from?
"In course of 30 over years, while drawing easy income in view of its captive market, this guy never uttered a single word, never even farted in a wayward way. "
This guy is truly knows how to twist and lead the gullible ones by the nose.
Will deal with the comments later. Just imagine, first line and he is already fudging.Was he
1) not PAP branch secretary, the chairman of CCC etc in Marine Parade
2) that he worked in NTUC for 30 years which any imbecile knows is a PAP organisation.
3) Did he complain before his retirement
4) Was NTUC not given access that others did not get
18 June 2011
Smears in blogs
There are a few people who have posted untrue statements about my past activities and current intentions in several blogs and websites.
Briefly, the remarks about me were:
I have served as a powerful PAP branch secretary for 30 years
Tan Kin Lian