• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sporns Rebut On Discrimination, But 154th Refuse to Publish in Print. WHY?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Singaporeans aren't fussy about jobs or pay - only realistic
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Monday's Forum Online letter by Mr Spenser Tan, 'Singaporeans too fussy, so ease up on hiring quota'. Mr Tan may be right in one way, but he is wrong in another.
Mr Tan said Singaporeans choose jobs near MRT stations. Well, who would not when bus services are so inadequate and infrequent?
Also, if one just relies on buses, one could be late for work at least three times a week. Moreover, employers demand that employees are punctual and may even deduct pay for lateness. Thus, it is natural for a job applicant to consider his future job location or risk losing the job later.
Mr Tan's other gripe was about wages paid in certain jobs. Does he realise that in the past seven years, inflation has made so many things overpriced, a worker who earns $1,600 a month can no longer afford a three-room HDB flat? Seven years ago, the same flat cost about $150,000, but today it has risen to more than $200,000, before factoring in the cash amount upfront.
If Singaporeans do not demand a decent wage commensurate with the lifestyle here to enjoy a proper living, I am sure many would end up without a roof over their heads. It is time for employers to wake up and look at the issues that cause Singaporeans to shun certain jobs.
For example, take the case of a maid. Would a Singaporean accept a maid's wage of $400 a month? Is that enough even for transport?
Raymund Koh
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
th_pvhmx.jpg


Heng ah! Still thought the peasant would ask me to wake up my idea. *hee*hee*
 

Glaringly

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
The problem is that, this government is encouraging all of us to become entrepreneur, and so by relaxing the rules to employ foreign workers at rock bottom wages ( thus offsetting the sky high other business cost, example Rental, ERP etc... ). And, any wannabe entrepreneur who weighted a lot of their business plan base on low wages would definitely jump in.

We must ask ourselves, is this kind of economy good for the long term future of Singapore and do we need these entrepreneurs ?

I bet you have the answer!

:(
 

chinkangkor

Alfrescian
Loyal
SMRT as a public transport operator is making record profit and giving out good dividends to Temasek year after year.

Public transport service has not improved much even when the population shoots up but to the political elites, that's fine because they are driving big cars, getting fat salaries and do not need to wait 30 minutes for that damned bus.
 
Top