• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Singapore Private School Vs National School

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singapore shall give freedom to Private School for Teaching Mandarin, Arabic, English or any language that will benefit Singaporean.

The National Full Government School or so call C class School shall lean basic Malay which so call National Language. From Primary 4 to University.

To built one united Singapore Nation, we shall have mix culture program to prevent fight between races among Singaporean.
 
Last edited:

QXD

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
You've just proven one of the vulnerabilities of having too many languages and mastery of none; all that rojak and grammatical faux pas trailing in your wake, tsk tsk...

Your written "england" is so fucked up that you can't even fake a news article no matter how hard you might try.
 

da dick

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singapore shall give freedom to Private School for Teaching Mandarin, Arabic, English or any language that will benefit Singaporean.

The National Full Government School or so call C class School shall lean basic Malay which so call National Language. From Primary 4 to University.

To built one united Singapore Nation, we shall have mix culture program to prevent fight between races among Singaporean.

seriously. why the hell did u think they taught everyone english for????!?! and the chinkies here will probably hacking each other with parangs more often if not for the speak mandarin campaign.
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
We must read History.

When Singapore Independent from Malaysia. The National Language is Malay.

Chinese Educate will not dare to built Chinese University without leaning Bahasa Singapura. Since PAP scrap Nantha University without building Bahasa Kebangsaan University so Chinese Educated just keep quiet because Malay do not dare to fight for their right.

That is why English take over as Singapore Business Language.
 

da dick

Alfrescian
Loyal
you're making absolutely no sense!!! history(compared to our neighbours) proved that adopting the english language for everyday use gave us an edge and helped attracted the early MNCs to our country. if not for all those foreign investments which allowed us to pay for all the newest weapons, we would have been forced to re-join the fucked up malaysian federation or be murdered in our sleep by the then militant indonesian government. if that's not a good enough reason for us to have adopted english, you can go and die since you obviously don't cherish your bloody life.

seriously if you fake commie/republicans don't know how to argue in english GTFO my interwebs and go post on Baidu or whatever you commies love posting in.
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
PRC Mainland China, Northern Mandarin are Different

ROC Taiwan, South Mandarin are Different.

Malaysian Mandarin (Malay Mandarin) are Different.

Singapore Mandarin (Singenglish Mandarin) are Different.

Singapore Mandarin will never same with Taiwan Mandarin.
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
Seven years ago, on 11th October 2003, the PAP Malay MPs together with their Mendaki organisation formed a Community Leaders Forum project following a series of focus group discussions to discuss issues and strategies to propel the Malay community forward. The event was graced and witnessed by then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong.

The PAP Malay MPs devised four four sectoral networks and split the responsibilities of leading each network amongst themselves. The networks focused on the areas of Education, Youth, Family and Employability.

In 2004, the PAP Malay MPs formed the CLF Steering Committee to implement a coordinated framework to facilitate the collaborative efforts across all sectoral networks.

The Community Leaders Forum Steering Committee is chaired by none other than Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources and Minister-In-Charge of Muslim Affairs. His role was to provide guidance and overall direction for the networks in implementing various CLF programmes.

Yayasan MENDAKI was designated the role as the CLF Secretariat. Each of the other PAP Malay MPs was to serve as Co-Chairperson of the respective network. Masagos Zulkifli and Hawizi Daipi were designated as co-chairmen of the Education Network. Over the last seven years, both Masagos and Hawizi are known to have implemented no major policy in the education area. Whatever they may claim to have done also did not close any gap in the education achievements of Malays and other ethnic groups. Seven years is ample time to bring major reforms and achieve decent leaps in outcomes in education area.

PAP Malay MPs Zaqy Mohamed and Fathimah Lateef were designated as co-chairpersons of Youth Development. From the beginning it was never clear what that meant. Nevertheless the opportunities that Malay youth require and the Malay youth capabilities that needs to be developed are not little or trivial. Instead the backwardness of Malay youth in educational achievements, their high representation in crime, their job issues, their addiction problems etc etc clearly provide ample areas for both Zaqy and Fatimah to work on. Once again both PAP Malay MPs have never implemented any major policy for Malay Youths in the last seven years even though they were co-chairpersons in charge of Malay Youth Development.

Maliki Osman and Faishal Ibrahim were two other PAP MPs who were designated the role of co-chairmen to lead the area of Malay Families Development. Again the agenda for this was never clear from the beginning. Yet the high rate of divorce in Malays, employment issues, health issues etc clearly provided ample areas for the two Malay MPs to work on and bring change. Both Maliki and Faishal never implemented any major policy to improve various dismal conditions of Malay Families. There has also been no improvement in outcomes of Malay Families from any of the work that Maliki or Faishal may claim to have done in the last seven years.

Halimah Yacob, Zainudin Nordin and Ahmad Magad were appointed to lead as co-chairpersons looking at Malay employability. Of the three, only Halimah attempted some minor efforts but then also in her other capacity for labour. The three PAP Malay MPs had not major policies in the last seven years to improve Malay employability. They achieved no serious improvement in Malay employability in the last seven years either.

Abdullah Tarmuggi and Zainul Abidin Rasheed were supposed to serve as resource persons though it was never clear from the beginning what that was supposed to mean.

The Community Leaders Forum was an excellent platform for the PAP Malay MPs to have brought reforms at least in some scale to the Malay community. More importantly they had ample resources and time over the last seven years. PAP’s claim for single party rule has been how fast they can move in policy making and implementing with the absence of opposition. The failure of PAP Malay MPs to have brought zero reforms to Malay community simply proves single party rule will not guarantee fast reforms.

These PAP Malay MPs’ combined salary for the last seven years comes to close to $50million. An enormous amount of Singaporeans’ resources for absolutely zero reforms and zero change in outcomes.

The supporters of PAP Malay MPs have totally no basis to justify their claims that no other party can do better than PAP Malay MPs. When it is clear the PAP Malay MPs have not achieved anything at all in the last seven years, there is nothing which equates to achieving less than nothing. Hence any opposition party stands to present Malay MPs who can achieve as poorly or better than PAP MPs. No opposition party can quite present Malay MPs who will achieve worse than PAP Malay MPs. That is practically impossible given PAP Malay MPs have not changed any outcomes in Malay community despite their complete control of parliament and government agencies, full range of resources, full control of media and incredibly high salaries.
 
Top