Simple Question on Big Bang

[vamjok]

Thanks for showing us your ignorance for all to see.

The concept of vacuum energy does not say that vacuum and energy are one my dear atheist boy. It simply says energy can exist in vacuum. You lied.


In the end, you still did not answer the question, what exploded?
Where did the energy came from?

is your stupidity refuse to accept it, not i lied. i said long before, its not my fault you are born stupid

 

[Kinana]

Anyone can go check out your BS. The concept of vacuum energy says nothing about vacuum and energy being one you liar!

And in the end the two very logical question about the big bang are left unanswered.

What exploded?

Where did the energy come from?

 

[vamjok]

go ahead and check loh, as if a stupid uneducated fuck like you know what are the right sources to look at with regards to this. as if i give a fuck about your lowly interpretation of current science.

as if you know what is energy time uncertainty principle which causes the popping out of these particles FROM NOTHING. dumb shit, arguing things that were already well established and making a joke out of yourself

 

[Kinana]

Checked already. The concept of vacuum energy did not say that vacuum and energy are one you liar!

 

[vamjok]

Checked already. The concept of vacuum energy did not say that vacuum and energy are one you liar!

keyword - energy time uncertainty principle, particle and anti particle from vacuum. no fucking idea where you check, and i am not interested.

can understand cannot that your fucking problem

 

[vamjok]

how about this, i give up on stupid people. you can come to university then u think about this. stupid fuck like you understand the meaning of treating vacuum as a field operator, input space and time label and we get energy? this is the mathematical prediction WHY ENERGY = VACUUM STUPID FUCK FROM QUANTUM FIELD THEORY.

another stupid fuck that use google to "check"

 

[vamjok]

http://itp.epfl.ch/webdav/site/itp/users/181759/public/aqft.pdf

I LIED? FUCKING GO THROUGH JUST THE FIRST 10 PAGES

 

[vamjok]

Come come come show us where you check from show the website that say i am wrong come

 

[Fook Seng]

As of current as far as i know, the universe is still expanding at an increasing rate due to the red shift observed from the stars. but it is not as fast as expected (that is where the dark material comes into play). the expand and contract version most do not agree with it.

I was not referring to Fred Hoyle's Steady State Theory. More recent concepts include various ways to eventual end the universe including Big Freeze, High Heat etc. One idea has the universe collapse and rejuvenate in a new Big Bang - the oscillation theory. Any has multiple puniverses existing at the same time and come and go at different times - multiverse theory. This seems to agree well with the String Theory. All have some problem including the violation of 2nd or 3rd Law of Thermodynamics. But when you talking on this scale both spatial and temporal, everything is possible. But you could be right about Red Shift. As we able to see further and further into space, more and more measurements are possible which influence our concept of the universe. One fairly recent report is that they could not find dark matter and dark energy around our solar system and every indication in our Galaxy. These being necessary for existing concepts to be relativistic means a lot of ideas will need to be revised. General Relativity is being replaced by a theory that can encompass gravity into its equations with the introduction of a properly calibrated cosmic code that seems to explain what Relativity can do and more. I am certain within the next one to two, a lot of ideas will be changed.

 

[vamjok]

I was not referring to Fred Hoyle's Steady State Theory. More recent concepts include various ways to eventual end the universe including Big Freeze, High Heat etc. One idea has the universe collapse and rejuvenate in a new Big Bang - the oscillation theory. Any has multiple puniverses existing at the same time and come and go at different times - multiverse theory. This seems to agree well with the String Theory. All have some problem including the violation of 2nd or 3rd Law of Thermodynamics. But when you talking on this scale both spatial and temporal, everything is possible. But you

that one i dunno seriously cos i dun mind telling u what i know is only scratching the surface for talking cock and singing song as particle physics is not my research interest. i did not look into string theory (thus theory related to it i will have zero clue) as it just dun appeal to me. i am one of those that do not believe in string theory LOL. i know in quantum level things becomes funny but....string theory was way too funny for me to accept LOL

the only thing i am paying attention to now is finding higg boson....THEN THE THEORY WILL BE ONE STEP TOWARDS COMPLETION! WHY WE HAVE MASS!

 

[zhihau]

Anyway we are dealing with space-time continuum, my friend.

last noted Alpha may not be a constant
anyway, me like looking at the big picture

 

[Fook Seng]

last noted Alpha may not be a constant
anyway, me like looking at the big picture

We have to be patient. Coming one, two years can be quite interesting. For layman summary watch out for reports in Discover.

 

[Fook Seng]

that one i dunno seriously cos i dun mind telling u what i know is only scratching the surface for talking cock and singing song as particle physics is not my research interest. i did not look into string theory (thus theory related to it i will have zero clue) as it just dun appeal to me. i am one of those that do not believe in string theory LOL. i know in quantum level things becomes funny but....string theory was way too funny for me to accept LOL

the only thing i am paying attention to now is finding higg boson....THEN THE THEORY WILL BE ONE STEP TOWARDS COMPLETION! WHY WE HAVE MASS!

I have my reservations regarding String Theory. You simply add dimensions when you cannot explain something. Don't seem right, although mathematically can explain a lot of things.

 

[zhihau]

You simply add dimensions when you cannot explain something. Don't seem right, although mathematically can explain a lot of things.

heheh...

bro, are we looking at 11 dimensions in all now?

 

[Fook Seng]

heheh...

bro, are we looking at 11 dimensions in all now?

If I am not mistaken, 11 dimensions for M-Theory and 10 dimensions for String Theory.

 

[Fook Seng]

last noted Alpha may not be a constant
anyway, me like looking at the big picture

Yes. This strange English gentleman by the name of Julian Barbour, an ex-academic but a now a free-lance researcher, has worked on a mathematical model somewhat different from the General Theory of Relativity. The General Theory has a serious weakness. It can explain cosmic size events but cannot make it applicable at the quantum level. Also the General Theory cannot explain why the universe is expanding the way it is without bringing in dark matter and dark energy with a mass-energy equivalent to 96% of that of the entire universe, a very serious assumption. The worst is that so far nobody has manaaged to find dark matter and dark energy near our solar system and there is indication of the same conclusion in the rest of the Galaxy (this could be due to the lack of appropriate measuring tools, though). Julian's new theory uses a cosmic code which is not a simple constant, a very neat and ingenious idea, and a lot of things now seems to fit in. There is no need to have dark matter and dark energy and cosmic and quantum scales can now be merged. I believe other experts are now trying to poke holes into his theory. We should know whether we really have something here in a year or two.

 

[zhihau]

The General Theory has a serious weakness

also noted that A.Einstein himself had qualms about adding that cosmological constant into his equation :o:o:o

 

[Fook Seng]

also noted that A.Einstein himself had qualms about adding that cosmological constant into his equation :o:o:o

If the General Theory is messy, the String Theory is even more so - pure mathematical model devoid of any physical correlation.

 

[zhihau]

you fellas are lucky to have tertiary education in your youth.

it's 活到老，学到老。having a degree or not is not as important as having that inquisitive mind and the willingness to explore

 

[zhihau]

If the General Theory is messy, the String Theory is even more so - pure mathematical model devoid of any physical correlation.

little wonder many aspiring scientists tried their best in their pursuit for the "theory of everything"
then again, why is there this need to marry classical physics to quantum mechanics? :o:o:o