• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Simple Question on Big Bang

actually that structure in japan till today we don't know if its artificial or natural. although it really look man-made ....
 
i believe your mouse is working, why not you click to the previous few pages and reread what had already being posted. there is a limit to stupidity, reposting what that had already being posted at least 10 times is really....

seriously are you last in class?
 
What exactly exploded sir and where did the energy come from?
You brought up vacuum energy right?
How can vacuum energy possibly explode if it is already the lowest energy form? And where did this energy came from in the first place?
 
What exactly exploded sir and where did the energy come from?
You brought up vacuum energy right?
How can vacuum energy possibly explode if it is already the lowest energy form? And where did this energy came from in the first place?

kinana,
you are a good scientist, your desire to question is certainly commendable :):):)
as pointed out earlier in my post 77, thought you had already understood that nothing exploded.
would appreciate if you could amend the question and ask what fuelled the expansion of the observable universe :):):)
 
kinana,
you are a good scientist, your desire to question is certainly commendable :):):)
as pointed out earlier in my post 77, thought you had already understood that nothing exploded.
would appreciate if you could amend the question and ask what fuelled the expansion of the observable universe :):):)

God created the universe that way.

It all started with God with me.
With atheists, it start with nothing.

Which one more logical you say?
 

It all started with God with me.
With atheists, it start with nothing

with all apologies, me don't think the universe started with nothing. quantum mechanics suggests the spontaneous creation and destruction of particles, which implies the flux of energy and its exchanges. not exactly nothing, if you may, it's energy.

coming from your point of view that GOD created everything, me as an atheist can only infer that your GOD = energy. do atheists need to worship energy? we see how we can better harness energy to better our civilisation :):):)
 
So where did the energy come from?

God created energy, He is not energy. Energy itself has no intelligence nor design. Our universe has designs.
 
So where did the energy come from?
God created energy, He is not energy. Energy itself has no intelligence nor design. Our universe has designs.

there lies the contention. scientists do not like to attribute the sun rising to the rooster's crow. we continuously seek out for a logical explanation. yes, me agree that there are designs in almost every physical object that we see, and they follow the laws of physics, be it classical physics or quantum mechanics, what gives?
 
talking to him is the same as talking to a retard. keep repeating and repeating the same thing and yet he does not get it. stupid to the max. just bloody scroll back the last few pages we had give him the same fucking replied again adn again and again. he still ask, is not our fault he is too dumb to understand.
 
Last edited:
talking to him is the same as talking to a retard. keep repeating and repeating the same thing and yet he does not get it. stupid to the max

me shall heed the advice of the elders and stop feeding the troll, readers are discerning enough :D:D:D
shall continue looking at bad policies from the PAP, and not let oneself be distracted :D:D:D
Hougang BE akan datang! just hope the good folks can give a convincing win for the oppositions :p:p:p
 
there lies the contention. scientists do not like to attribute the sun rising to the rooster's crow. we continuously seek out for a logical explanation. yes, me agree that there are designs in almost every physical object that we see, and they follow the laws of physics, be it classical physics or quantum mechanics, what gives?

And you did not answer my simple questions sir.
Why do you try to blindly defend big bang when you can't stand by it?
 
And you did not answer my simple questions sir.
Why do you try to blindly defend big bang when you can't stand by it?

not defending Big Bang, it doesn't require my defense, it is only a theory to help folks understand this observable universe better. in fact, in my post 77, me raised questions too, yes, the scientific community is still figuring out a lot of questions, already told you in post 2 that our work is called research :):):)

by the way, do you get paid a lot for each post?
 
not defending Big Bang, it doesn't require my defense, it is only a theory to help folks understand this observable universe better. in fact, in my post 77, me raised questions too, yes, the scientific community is still figuring out a lot of questions, already told you in post 2 that our work is called research :):):)

by the way, do you get paid a lot for each post?


How can it be used to understand the universe when its illogical, obviously not true and unscientific?

Me get paid nothing for posting here.
How much are you being paid for each post on this forum?
 
Last edited:
Oei I thought you said stop feeding the troll.

How do you describe the colour of the sky to a blind person?

not defending Big Bang, it doesn't require my defense, it is only a theory to help folks understand this observable universe better. in fact, in my post 77, me raised questions too, yes, the scientific community is still figuring out a lot of questions, already told you in post 2 that our work is called research :):):)

by the way, do you get paid a lot for each post?
 
There you, these atheists cannot make sense of the big bang, get owned n embarrassed n need to run away. So much for this blind religion called atheism
 
There you, these atheists cannot make sense of the big bang, get owned n embarrassed n need to run away. So much for this blind religion called atheism

:D:D:D good to note that some folks are good at ridiculing themselves :D:D:D
shall not share your glory :p:p:p
 
zhihau said:
not defending Big Bang, it doesn't require my defense, it is only a theory to help folks understand this observable universe better.

Agree with you totally. If there is any need for defence, it is definitely easier to defend Big Bang than God creating the universe in 7 days.
 
Well you atheist can't defend much less make sense of the big bang so far. You got to do better than that for your religion bruders.
Cheering yourselves and insulting others just won't help your belief system.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top