Shall I ban ginfreely in an attempt to improve the environment or is the forum too far gone?

[superpower]

View attachment 212294

Thanks, boss.

 

[MyMother]

Which brings me to my original point which is that the forum is what the members make of it. It is the perfect example of what anarchy looks like.

I get the "anarchy" label, but I think it’s important to recognize that it didn’t just emerge out of nowhere. This forum’s chaotic state is a direct result of years of neglect. When there’s no proper moderation or rules in place, chaos is bound to take over. The lack of oversight allowed a few disruptive individuals to drag things down, and instead of nipping those issues in the bud, they were allowed to fester and grow unchecked.

Anarchy might be a fitting description for the current state, but it’s not a reflection of how things were set up from the beginning. The forum could have been kept in better shape with just a little effort, especially when certain members started abusing the freedom granted to them. Without intervention, it was inevitable that things would spiral into this kind of mess.

It’s not about a lack of order being the foundation, it’s about how neglect gave rise to the disorder we see now. That’s the root cause of the problem. Let’s not confuse years of inaction with a natural state of things.

 

[Leongsam]

I get the "anarchy" label, but I think it’s important to recognize that it didn’t just emerge out of nowhere. This forum’s chaotic state is a direct result of years of neglect. When there’s no proper moderation or rules in place, chaos is bound to take over. The lack of oversight allowed a few disruptive individuals to drag things down, and instead of nipping those issues in the bud, they were allowed to fester and grow unchecked.

Anarchy might be a fitting description for the current state, but it’s not a reflection of how things were set up from the beginning. The forum could have been kept in better shape with just a little effort, especially when certain members started abusing the freedom granted to them. Without intervention, it was inevitable that things would spiral into this kind of mess.

It’s not about a lack of order being the foundation, it’s about how neglect gave rise to the disorder we see now. That’s the root cause of the problem. Let’s not confuse years of inaction with a natural state of things.

In my opinion the problem is not the poor member I have banned from this section. It is the bunch who goaded her and tormented her. If everyone had just ignored her rants there wouldn't have been a need for me to get involved at all.

 

[MyMother]

In my opinion the problem is not the poor member I have banned from this section. It is the bunch who goaded her and tormented her. If everyone had just ignored her rants there wouldn't have been a need for me to get involved at all.

The core issue here isn’t the members who were drawn into the taunting, but the fact that she actively sought out random and new members to provoke, myself included. I chose to ignore her, but that doesn’t mean everyone will handle the situation the same way.

She wasn’t simply a passive participant in the chaos, she initiated it, picking fights with random people, accusing them to be clones of other members and creating drama where none existed. When someone repeatedly goes out of their way to target others for abuse, it’s hard to blame the people who, at some point, reacted to that behavior. It takes two to clap, and she’s been the one creating the attention and feeding off it.

Yes, the cycle of back-and-forth escalated, but we shouldn’t forget that it was her actions that sparked the chaos in the first place. By focusing on the members who got caught up in the mess, the real problem gets overlooked. It’s not about defending the actions of those who taunted her; it’s about recognizing that the disruption stemmed from her choice to attack and provoke, not simply respond to others.

You can ban all who have taunted or abused her, but new ones will continue to emerge by her own doing.

Ultimately, this forum is meant to be a space for meaningful exchanges, not for one person to dominate it with chaos.

 

[Balls2U]

This will be her reaction when she is hit with the truth.

 

[MyMother]

This has gone on for years because she’s been consistently provoking members out of nowhere, hoping to get a reaction. She’s been using these interactions to position herself as the victim, turning any response into further ammunition for her drama. And that’s exactly how this whole thing has escalated into what it is now: a constant cycle of provocation and reaction.

The reason this has lasted so long, and why more people have gotten involved, is that the situation was never addressed early on. The longer it went on without any real intervention or clear boundaries, the more people felt compelled to join the fray, whether out of frustration, boredom, or just being dragged into her web. What started as one person’s disruptive behavior turned into a royal rumble, as each new person got caught up in the chaos, often just to defend themselves or others.

When there’s no clear structure or consequence for disruptive behavior, it gives people permission to act out without fear of repercussions, and that’s exactly what’s been happening here. It’s a mess that could’ve been nipped in the bud years ago, but without proper moderation or guidelines, it just kept spiraling.

 

[AHGS14]

She rich. This method useless...

She said she's rich, we don't know for sure. In any case, she can be broke if she continuously buy slots agressively for additional postings. Sooner rather than later, she may not be able to boast that she's rich

 

[jurongkechil]

She is a harmless auntie

 

[dirtywoman]

This will be her reaction when she is hit with the truth.

View attachment 212365

my gut feel is she will re register a new user name and continue her siaolang spam tirade here in courtyard

 

[Narong Wongwan]

Let’s hold a referendum

 

[glockman]

Should I un-ignore her now that she's being banished, and not able to foul up the Courtyard?

 

[myfoot123]

What to you think?

Why are you even requesting the obvious, we question.

 

[myfoot123]

possible to limit the number of threads he/she can start ?

maybe one thread a week ?

One is too many. Why are you so generous?

 

[GOD IS MY DOG]

One is too many. Why are you so generous?

aiyah........we can't afford to lose members leh................only this fella start way too many threads lah..........posting is okay

 

[dirtywoman]

Should I un-ignore her now that she's being banished, and not able to foul up the Courtyard?

she spam tag u 80x in her dedicated section, you will also kana if u unignore her

 

[Hightech88]

What to you think?

Yes banish her to Siberia! Don't waste any more time, else you will 100% regret.

She is a siao lang thread spammer with incurable psychosis. You have been too lenient on her too many times.

If you don't remove her and just 'limit her posts' with a special section, it becomes a Streisand effect - you are making her even more famous and worsen her psychosis then she will return with a vengeance 10X worse (e.g. spamming all Samsters in her threads) like a never ending story. SBF's reputation will then continue to be tarnished by such xia suay siao langs becoming a joke and a laughingstock.

For God sakes, get rid of her completely at all costs, once and for all with ZERO mercy.

 

[glockman]

she spam tag u 80x in her dedicated section, you will also kana if u unignore her

Hwah that would be scary! Hokay, ignore stays.

 

[Balls2U]

she spam tag u 80x in her dedicated section, you will also kana if u unignore her

I've got 106!!! All the same shit.

 

[glockman]

I've got 106!!! All the same shit.

So you're our top scorer. Must give you a trophy.

 

[Aaron carter]

Cut the chitchat, a-hole and just ban her already!