• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Olympics Disastrous Opening Ceremony

Other then a black men wearing a top hat nonsense, I prefer this one over the Chinese one.

Its very artsy, very creative. G.B has set the bench mark.
 
I wonder how it would have turned out had they commissioned another British film director instead: Christopher Nolan. :D
 
I wonder how it would have turned out had they commissioned another British film director instead: Christopher Nolan. :D

i will take Nolan anyday, i hate the slumdog shit, in fact any movie about india is shit.
 
Last edited:
It is OK for people to like london olympic opening ceremony better than beijing one.

Some like it, some don't. It is fine, all it show is some people have lack of good taste.
 
no, because india is a shit hole. movie about shit hole is dog shit. Just being honest about it.

Oh ok, Your a pretty high class guy then, All glitz and glamor and living in a 1st world country as well yah?

Nice ideology.
 
It is OK for people to like london olympic opening ceremony better than beijing one.

Some like it, some don't. It is fine, all it show is some people have lack of good taste.

I'm sure the North Koreans would agree. :rolleyes:
 
I'm sure the North Koreans would agree. :rolleyes:

he is my hero, i wish i can be like him, rich , powerful and send people to concentration camp at my whim, that is one good life.
kim-jong-il.jpg
 
London 2012 Olympic opening ceremony
by Andrzej Lukowski

Is there a Chinese phrase equivalent to ‘WTF’? If so, one imagines it was uttered by more than a few mouths in Beijing on Friday night. While budgets are slashed across the board elsewhere in the UK, theatre and film director Danny Boyle was gifted £27m for the London 2012 Olympics opening ceremony, with the express remit of making the British not look like impoverished bumpkins next to the Chinese, whose uber-bombastic 2008 Olympics opener might as well have been subtitled ‘world, meet your new superpower’.

In the event, Boyle’s faintly bonkers tribute to all things British seemed to only have the slightest eye on international audiences: if our hypothetical observers from the Chinese capital had managed to get all the references in a ceremony that paid homage to everything from maypole dancing to Isambard Kingdom Brunel to the NHS to ‘Brookside’s famed lesbian kiss, I’d probably suggest their anglophilia was getting a little obsessive.

Certainly there were moments when even the most patriotic Brit at home had to rely upon the BBC commentary to work out what the hell was going on, which was unfortunate: Huw Edwards and Hazel Irvine offered drab but reasonably informative updates, but their colleague, middle-aged DJ Trevor Nelson, sounded bored verging on contemptuous. It wasn’t a Jubilee-scale fiasco, but the Beeb again seemed bizarrely unwilling to allow any of its formidable roster of historians, arts experts, sociologists and people who knew what they were talking about to have a go.

Not that it greatly mattered, of course: give or take the odd Tory MP, the British public’s response to the ceremony has been rapturous, and fair enough. It would, of course, be ludicrous to say that a ceremony that seemed to wilfully lurch between brilliance and naffness was ‘perfect’. The pastoral hey nonny nonny bits never quite worked, I didn’t think, but the eruption of the satanic mills of the Industrial Revolution was beyond awe-inspiring, everything Boyle achieved with last year’s steampunk-flavoured National Theatre hit ‘Frankenstein’ times about a gazillion. The five white hot Olympic rings of steel burning through the night is surely the image that will define these games, and rightly so. The tribute to the NHS couldn’t match it for spectacle, but the simple fact of it was wonderful: whether its presence was a political gesture or not (and, er, it definitely was) Boyle’s knack for incorporating the things that British people actually care about into the spectacle was perhaps the ceremony’s defining characteristic. Hence: the guy who invented the internet – brilliant! A tribute to the Windrush – excellent! Rowan Atkinson playing the ‘Chariots of Fire’ theme tune – yay! James Bond, um, parachuting the Queen into the stadium – er, sure… An ultra-tame dance homage to The Sex Pistols felt about as punk rock as a flannel and some sort of inane skit about a girl finding love after losing her phone was horrible. But by and large, Boyle’s everything but the kitchen sink enthusiasm and unwillingness to overly normalise Britishness for a global audience won out. Bits of it were a bit rubbish, bits of it were jaw-droppingly brilliant, rarely did it take itself too seriously – that’s us in a nutshell, and how can you really criticise that?

The final half hour - in which the semi-forgotten Arctic Monkeys played a genuinely incendiary two song set, Doreen Lawrence carried the Olympic flag and Steve Redgrave used the Olympic flame to light a giant cauldron made of torches – did actively threaten to be perfect. But then good old Paul McCartney came along to play a faintly horrific but reasonably endearing version of ‘Hey Jude’ – Britishness restored.
 
The Hollywood Reporter calls Boyle a "ballsy" choice, saying his opening was "a unique take on large-canvas nation-themed spectacle that is likely to go down as one of the more eccentric and memorable kickoffs in the Games' history."

The New York Times said the opening was "a wild jumble of the celebratory and the fanciful" that presented Britain as "a nation secure in its own post-empire identity, whatever that actually is."
Five stars from the Guardian. "It didn't make a bit of sense, but what a thrilling spectacle and what fun."
At least one Brit wasn't impressed, though. Conservative MP Aidan Burley tweeted the show was "leftie multi-cultural crap." He quickly apologized, saying he had been "misunderstood," writes Sky News.
 
Why the Olympic Opening Ceremony sucked.


Ever since I first heard that the 2012 Olympics was going to be held in London, I was against it. The BBC would be like a child who drank way too much Ribena trying to promote it, the government will be spending millions on what is basically a global sports day, TV would be worse than usual as well as the fact it would be, once again, London getting all the glory (seriously LOCOG, where's the Northern love? Just putting football in Old Trafford is, quite frankly, offensive and a stereotype of the north of England!).


Then once I saw the London segment during the closing ceremony of the Beijing Olympics, I was mortified.


Leona Lewis warbling 'Whole Lotta Love' (Why not get all of Led Zep rather than just Robert Plant?) David Beckham kicking footballs off the top of a double decker bus? The BNP having a field day over an image of an Asian girl walking on the backs of mostly white adults? The only way the organisers could have gotten more stereotypical in its portrayal of the UK would be to have Hugh Grant in full cricket garb swimming around in a cup of tea, using an oversized crumpet as a life preserver. Great start LOCOG! Four years before the Olympics and I'm already worried that it's going to fail!


Fast forward to the present day, and my fears were proven. Starting off with a 'green and pleasant' land, peasants wondered about, tilling fields as was commonplace in the Middle Ages, until the arrival of Isambard Kingdom Brunel (here played by Kenneth Branagh, one of the only good things about the ceremony!) came along and trampled on all the pretty flowers, building massive smoke stacks in it's place. So much for 'Green and Pleasant Land'! This is where the stereotypes started, out came all the Victorian industrialists, complete with top hats and mutton chops as well as the ragged Oliver Twist style workers (although I do like the fact they glossed over child workers!) who come together to make a giant ring, that lifts into the air and joins four others to form the Olympic logo. There we go kids! Brunel engineered the Olympics too!


Next came the sketch 'Happy and Glorious' this I was looking forward to, as it was the Queen givng James Bond his next mission, to start the Olympics. Sounds pretty good, no? What they filmed in the end was crap. Daniel Craig was as smug as Brozza at his worst, so much unlike his portrayal of Bond, the Churchill statue coming alive was cheesy and cringeworthy, as well as everyone waving at the helicopter anyway, AND WHAT WAS WITH THE SLOW MOTION CORGIS? Seriously, every second shot was of the corgis pissing around! This of course didn't put me in the best of moods for the rest of the ceremony. At least it did set up a funny arrival for the Queen, I'll give it that.


The next segment, celebrating the NHS was confusing to say the least. What possessed Underworld (the dance group famous for 'Born Slippy' and those responsible for the music in the ceremony) to think that Tubular Bells, THE THEME FROM THE EXORCIST, would be a good way to represent the National Health Service? Considering that the NHS/Government relationship is very tense due to cutbacks in order to save banks and pay for this shit, I think a load of children jumping on beds and 50's style matrons doing the jitterbug will go down well with neither the hardworking doctors and nurses, or the sick patients in their care! This all culminated in national moody cow JK Rowling reading an excerpt of Peter Pan and unleashing nightmare fuel on the world as creatures from the Black Lagoon ran on stage snatching children for the character from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and causing inflatables of Cruela DeVil, Voldemort and Mick Jagger to rise up. With JK Rowling there, Voldemort of course got centre stage, before being defeated by the power of the Mary Poppins Luftwaffe and turning into a dead baby. But not all British literature was celebrated. Where was Aslan? Where was Gandalf? Where was anything by Roald Dahl, the master of children's literature?


Then came Mr. Bean playing the monotone synth section of 'Chariots Of Fire (Who didn't see that song coming(?)) This segment was funny at first, but just went on too long, this then melded into an unbelievably twee and quite frankly embarassing story focusing on digital Britain and the music the country has produced over the last 40 years. It had a weak story based on the supposed 'typical Saturday night' with terrible graphics and a cringey love story crowbarred into it. The music choices were pretty good, and nearly makes up for it. But the fact they pretty much cut out two decades of music (the really good ones too!) was unforgiveable. Why in the short 80's section was there no Smiths songs? Why also was there no Stone Roses? Why was the only reference to Happy Mondays 10 seconds of the piano riff of 'Step On? These artists all had a massive influence on the music scene. The 90's section was even worse. Two songs. One of them was Born Slippy (just had to point out you made Trainspotting again didn't you Danny?) the other was the awesome Firestarter. But no Wonderwall, quite possibly Britain's best known song of the past 15 years? This of course all culminated into the crapfest that is the noughties, with Dizzee Rascal appearing to rap for a young couple until they kiss and Song 2 predictably plays. THIS IS NOT A TYPICAL SATURDAY NIGHT FOR BRITISH YOUTHS! If Danny really wanted to portray an accurate Saturday night for the UK's 18-24's he should have taken more cues from his masterpiece Trainspotting rather than merely referencing it. A night out in Manchester (and I'm pretty sure this'll be worse in London, due to the fact that Mancunians are more than likely out for a laugh and don't take things as seriously) usually entails some forms of sex, drugs, rock and roll, violence and wanton mayhem. But we have to appear to be good little kiddies to the world, even when shows like Skins shows pretty much the truth (it does go overboard here and there). But I will say 'Yay Tim Berners-Lee!


Then came the most offensive (to me) section. A tribute to the 7th July bombings through interpretive dance. A terrorist act is being portrayed. Through the medium of interpretive dance.


WHAT THE BLOODY HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU? A supposed celebration of this country and you put in a section dedicated to a national tragedy? Yes I understand that the bombings blindsided the UK the day after we found out we were hosting the games, so a memorial is appropriate, BUT YOU MAKE IT RESPECTFUL AND IN GOOD TASTE! INTERPRETIVE DANCE IS NOT THOSE THINGS. It's like if Beijing 2008 did a shadow puppet play based on Tiananmen Square, or Atlanta '96 an animation of Manifest Destiny.



Then came the boring bit, athletes wondering around the stadium, Danny Boyle missing the chance for a great laugh by having a lone sprinter from Gallifrey among them (why were there no Doctor Who references by the way?) and besides from the guy giving a Nazi salute while the German team arrived, and the Queen looking (rightfully) pissed off there's nothing to discuss. Speeches were dull too and Jacques Rogge proved he's a pretentious sod with his sappy offering. The Arctic Monkeys were crap too. Why was the lead singer poorly attempting an American accent rather than singing in his natural Sheffield one?


Then came the torch lighting, who did it? Seven young, up and coming (at least until their first injury) atheletes. Now I get the symbolism of the old guard of athletes that included bald swimmer dude Duncan Goodhew and the biggest cause of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in the 80's Daley Thompson as well as slightly younger athletes like Kelly Holmes handing over the torches to the young people. But why not have a known athlete do it? You had seven there, get one of them to light the torch! But I suppose I can at least give Seb Coe some credit for not doing it himself or getting David Tennant to do it, thus legitimising Russel T Davies. I do like the design of the actual cauldron though, it's very modern and avant garde. Paul McCartney then ruined the theme of old passing to the younger generation by turning up to flog the dead horse that is 'Hey Jude' again. I think Elbow would have been a better choice here, 'One Day Like This' anyone?


This was not an accurate representation of Britain, it's a representation of how LOCOG wants you to see Britain, and I bet the London Tourism board is loving the thought of all those tourists coming in with their money for a taste of the UK, without actually seeing it. If you actually want to see real England, then you're best to avoid the tourist trap that is Central London and venture outside the M25. Manchester is the better representation of the typical English city, plus there's all that lovely countryside nearby with the Peak and Lake Districts not more than 50 miles away.


So there's my thought on the Opening Ceremony, if you agree or disagree please say so in the comments, I'm sure opinions on it vary and I'd love to hear them.
 
That loud sucking sound is nearly four hours of the Isles of the United Kingdom fellating itself at the opening of the 2012 Olympics. I think it was the precise moment hospital beds with sick children and their nurses filled the stage, followed by a wave of Mary Poppins…. no wait, when Daniel Craig as 007 and a Queen Elizabeth II impersonator jumped out of a helicopter into the brand new, 80,000 seater Olympic Stadium in London.

Silly crap.

Just like this entire $14B, travel brochure. Danny Boyle (where is David Lean when you need him?) had an audience of the entire world scratching its heads and muttering "what the fuck was that all about?" If they made it through to the end. Which I didn't come close to.

I got through an hour or so before I remembered NBC had the Ceremony on a delayed feed so nothing out of the ordinary was going to happen, though it was so boring it is possible the London live might have caught up with us (I know, the concept is that though four hours it felt more like fourteen hours so that by the time… ah, forget it).

The first half hour had NBC clearing its throat with a useless "what you will see over the next two weeks") (Not see: the only thing I have the vaguest interest in is Women's volleyball)/ That was followed by the stadium grounds dressed as the verdant English countryside, you saw "War Horses", you know what I mean, morphing into Industrial revolution UK… so on and so forth: it was like watching a country going down the drain in five minute poorly choreographed segments that segued into each other till the admittedly jawdropping lord of the olympic rings finale (that's the pix up there).

Musically, director Boyle is the man who invented the punk song as soundtrack with his "Trainspotting" movie and resurrected Iggy Pop's career so it was not a shocker to hear the Sex Pistols "Pretty Vacant" and even the Pistols anti-monarchy "God Save The Queen. Not surprising but still appreciated. Much better than "Tubular Bells" and "Chariots Of Fire". In the latter, comedian Rowan Atkinson in Mr. Bean mode was resolutely unfunny as an organ player with a sneezing fit. 30 years on, Bean there, done that.

Paul McCartney was excellent at the end, he is the only person in the world for whom an audience of a billion is business as usual. Yeah, he was good, though perhaps he could have gotten out from behind his piano during "Hey Jude". Incidentally, if you want to watch it anywhere, forget it. It's been blocked by the Olympics Committee in yet another act of mindless hubris; below is the only snippit I can find. Oh, and Boyle promises an album of music from the bog show will be released the minutes the Olympics are over. For me, that would be right this second.

Ceremony: D

Music: B-
 
london 2012 olympic opening ceremony SUCK ! could not compare with Beijing
2012-7-28 17:48
提问者: jerrychae | 浏览次数:132次

问题补充:

David Beckham said we will and must be better than Beijing , now see the UK show last night is S-U-C-K ! and UK people should be shame they made suck and childish show.Even Taylor swift a " LOVE STORY " MV could be much better , or a John Milton note. Show histroy ? how about your invasion history for the world ????

我来帮他解答

2012-7-28 18:02
满意回答

wonderful! The last change of thewith this idea,she could not forbear acting 奥运村Olympic Village 组委会organization committee 开幕式opening ceremo

0
| 评论
向TA求助

回答者: 3882572 | 二级采纳率:24%

擅长领域: 暂未定制

参加的活动: 暂时没有参加的活动
推荐答案
2012-7-28 17:58

The biggest different between the two shows is London's is featured with more free-style performances while Beijing's seems more magnificent and uniformed. This reflects a major cultural difference between the West and the East, as the West is a more individualistic society that encourages more of personalized behaviour, and the East is more of a collective society that emphasizeds conformity.

追问

i mean the show not the culture.

回答

Oneman's meat is another man's poison
 
[video=youtube;Jtm0ZvEJOY4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jtm0ZvEJOY4[/video]
 
I totally did not get that segment, now it is explain as
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A young man who glimpsed June on the Tube picked up her lost mobile phone, and love triumphed after he chased desperately sought to find her on a night out.

Set to classic Brit tunes throughout the last 40 years, Jasmine clearly dazzled.

article-2180277-143FE13D000005DC-619_233x318.jpg


article-2180277-143FE1B6000005DC-383_468x286.jpg


The 18-year-old Brit School student helped to bring the programme out of the industrialisation segment of the show and into the digital age.

As part of the Frankie and June say thanks Tim segment, a tribute to British scientist Tim Berners-Lee, Jasmine shone as she played a girl who had lost her phone on a night out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top