• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Of Niches and Seng Kang West

Re: Temple saga: Firm set up 16 days after tender called

Do not be fooled! Crafty residents are trying deflect attention away so as to back out of a deal they did not do due diligence on. We can't let people willy nilly walk out of transactions as and when they like it. It is not fair to public institutions like HDB, which is already suffering billion dollar losses from subsidizing housing for the masses.
 
Re: Temple saga: Firm set up 16 days after tender called

That doesn't say the company was 16 days old when the tender was awarded. It says it was registered 16 days before the tender was called.

This logic same same with our esteemed AG's Classic "inside polling station not same within 200m" logic....
 
Re: One question about Fernvale dialogue session.

PAP MPs serve the people: sometimes on a cold platter, sometimes in a claypot, sometimes in a rotisserie.
 
Re: Temple saga: Firm set up 16 days after tender called

A fine example of PAP corruption.. Period.
 
Re: One question about Fernvale dialogue session.

Vote in a donkey also better than this lampar bin.....
Donkey can't do jackshit and only eat hay....but that's better than lamparbin who conspires with others to fuck you up.
If Lamparbin doesn't act appropriately, he risks ending up like that Ass Doctor in Punggol East in the next GE.

To annul the tender which has already been awarded seems unlikely. At most, the HDB will allow a refund to those who want to reject their BTOs.
 
Last edited:
Re: Temple saga: Firm set up 16 days after tender called

This logic same same with our esteemed AG's Classic "inside polling station not same within 200m" logic....

The company was registered on the 12th of June.

The tender was awarded on the 17th of July.

I don't need AG's brand of mathematics to work out the fact that the company was not 16 days old when the tender was awarded.


Capture12-640x68.jpg


Capture16-640x223.jpg


Capture15-640x385.jpg
 
Re: One question about Fernvale dialogue session.

...To Serve Man.

[video=youtube;D6dXsjKcA9I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6dXsjKcA9I[/video]

PAP MPs serve the people: sometimes on a cold platter, sometimes in a claypot, sometimes in a rotisserie.
 
Last edited:
Re: One question about Fernvale dialogue session.

Why is Lam Pin Min, the servant of Fernvale sitting along with the reps from HDB, URA and Lifecorp?

Isn't he suppose to sit with the residents and raise questions against them instead?

Hey 60.1%, open your fucking big eyes and see! :oIo:

Fucking Lao Chee Bye Lam Pin Min! :oIo:

Well said.all pap mp are bastards
 
Re: One question about Fernvale dialogue session.

Lam Pin Min

懒 (from 懒叫) 拼命

懒拼命
 
Re: Sengkang "temple" - 3 Day Old $1 Company Can Win HDB Tender

This shows that LKY boh chup now due to his frailing mind.

And his son Ah Loong is incapable of handling such issues.
 
Re: Sengkang "temple" - 3 Day Old $1 Company Can Win HDB Tender

I'm happy to see more sinkies in sinkieland inc. cheated by pap.

And how about ttsh protecting ft Ello and sacking a sinkie straightaway for misconducts? I'm happy to see that too.

I feel embarrassed to tell others overseas that my govt is racist, favoring foreigners over locals.
 
Re: Sengkang "temple" - 3 Day Old $1 Company Can Win HDB Tender

Bromptongate 2. Where is CPIB? The tender and setup date are too close to be a coincidence
 
Re: Sengkang "temple" - 3 Day Old $1 Company Can Win HDB Tender

Wow so the parent company also $3 only? Who is paying money to build the temper then? Are they going to look for investors to pump in money to build the temple?

Corruption. Business as usual. PAP style guanxi.

60% of Sinkies are okay with this. ;)
 
Re: Sengkang "temple" - 3 Day Old $1 Company Can Win HDB Tender

I remember fine prints must not be smaller than a certain font size for it to be legally enforceable or legitimate.
 
Re: Sengkang "temple" - 3 Day Old $1 Company Can Win HDB Tender

Wow so the parent company also $3 only? Who is paying money to build the temper then? Are they going to look for investors to pump in money to build the temple?

S$ 1/- company,..if bankrupt,..can walk away scott-free.

Remember Riverview Plaza's Contractor's abandon project due to bankruptcy ?

It would be more interesting if the internet sleuths can connect the relationships between the various directors, proxys,....

I smell the Bukit batok Rats,....in Sengkang,...
 
Re: Sengkang "temple" - 3 Day Old $1 Company Can Win HDB Tender

I'm happy to see more sinkies in sinkieland inc. cheated by pap.

And how about ttsh protecting ft Ello and sacking a sinkie straightaway for misconducts? I'm happy to see that too.

I feel embarrassed to tell others overseas that my govt is racist, favoring foreigners over locals.

FT Ello is clone of the PAP IB stirring shit lah.
 
Re: One question about Fernvale dialogue session.

Can anyone remember some years back, HDB retrenched many,.. Paid huge compensation & later rehired sameusinf another related Company ?

Yes, Sometime between 2002 and 2003. HDB did not impose any cap on the amount of compensation for those who were retrenched. At that time, the standard practice in the public sector was a cap of one month for every two years in service subject to a maximum of 25 months. But HDB totally ignored this and paid those retrenched one month for every year in service without any cap. The greater joke is that majority of those retrenched simply reported for work the next day with the new company Surbana seating in the same office with the same work desk and telephone and same pay!!!

THe HDB's manner of compensation was not known to the public till later when PSA also retrenched it staff, a cap was imposed and this led to a huge outcry of unfairness among those retrenched pointing to HDB's case. Only then did the MOM came out with a law to impose a cap by which then the HDB retrenched already had a huge windfall while still gainfully employed.
 
MP Lam Pin Min Patient With Confrontational Sinkie! Good man!

http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/01/06/dr-lam-past-residents-objected-to-kindergartens-too/

The recent revelation that the government is allowing a Chinese temple cum columbarium to be built next to HDB BTO flats in Sengkang West, has caused an uproar among the future HDB residents there.

In an effort to soothe the residents’ anxieties, Sengkang West MP Lam Pin Min conducted a town hall meeting with the residents on Sunday (4 Jan). Over 400 attended.

The dialogue session also had representatives from the Life Corporation Pte Ltd, Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and Housing Development Board (HDB).

During the dialogue, Dr Lam tried to convince the residents that there will be no funeral parlour at the planned temple.

He also tried to convince the residents that they should have seen the fine prints on the brochure with regard to the ancillary services listed for the Chinese temple, such as operating a columbarium within its premises.

In an attempt to obfuscate the issue, he added that he had faced objections from residents in the past too, against putting up a childcare centre or a kindergarten in a HDB BTO development.

“I face resistance from residents. It is not just columbarium,” he said.

A resident by the name of John Tan countered Dr Lam and disagreed that the residents would object to any other facilities built in their estate. The residents at the dialogue session applauded John wholeheartedly.

Following is part of the transcript provided by TOC, detailing the exchange between Dr Lam and resident John:

Dr. Lam:That is beside the point. I think what is important is that you know.. as the MP of Sengkang West. My duty is to address your concern, to speak up for my residents and to protect our interest. Alright?Take for example, if let say..err.. URA or HDB were to say, lets change this particular site that has been tendered for Chinese temple and change it to a crematorium. You think I will let it? Obviously I would not. I would be the first one to make noise and say how can you put up a crematorium in the middle of a residential estate? So that is also in my interest to protect because I have to answer to my residents.

John Tan: Yes, I understand that, that is your duty. But let’s look at it this way. How many of us know that there is going to be columbarium next to our flat, anybody saw the small print or fine print? No?

(Residents say ‘no’ in unison)

Everyone know it as a Chinese temple. ok?

Now, what is the projected earning for the next five years for your company? Because you are telling me you don’t want to run it for profit and all that. Hey, you are a listed company you know? You are always making money, how can you say that you are not making money? What is the projected income for the next five years?

(Residents applause)

Dr. Lam: Err.. shall we just bring back to our discussion. Just now as I was asking alright, after this dialog, we want to make a few things very clear, alright?

This piece of land has been tendered out for a Chinese Temple, alright? There will be no funeral services as far as I am aware for the next thirty years, this land has been tendered out. There will not be funeral services. Ok? This is one thing I want to clarify.

Secondly, there will be no cremation services. As far as I am aware. ok? I cannot tell you things that I don’t know but as far I am aware I am not here to blast or anything like that. As far I am aware there will not be funeral services, there will not be cremation services. ok?

Thirdly, this piece of land has been tendered off for a Chinese Temple, a place of worship, ok? ok?

And in the brochure, alright? and also in the URA guidelines, I have also just flashed it out alright in places of worship there are ancillary uses ok?

And one of the ancillary uses is a columbarium with not more than 20% of GFA (Gross Floor Area). Ok? This are facts that are in the URA, it is in the brochure. We are not here to hide or bluff. Ok? Alright?

I mean those of you who bought the Fernvale here, you have the brochure it is written there. We are not hiding anything.

Of course we have the resident’s feedback, oh why can’t you have a site plan where the picture is, put there Chinese temple stroke (/) columbarium blah blah blah that kind of thing.

Alright? Err…I mean if you look at the approved ancillary uses. Alright? It can be for conference room, library, kindergarten, childcare centre services, blah blah blah. ok?

Then of course the next question, are we supposed to put all of these into the site map? Alright? Because to be honest with you, although we are sitting now discuss about ancillary service for columbarium. alright?

If let say for example, in my past experience. Alright?

When we build a childcare centre or a kindergarten, I face resistance from residents. it is not just columbarium.

When I say we are going to put a childcare centre or a kindergarten in this place I have faced resistance from residents…

A Resident shouted: “I think that is beside the point already”

Dr. Lam: No wait wait let me finish first.

John: if you are talking about no, put on the site plan, are you telling me that the site plan is so small, you cannot put all these words in? You can’t put it inside there? You can!

There is only a Chinese temple, there is so much space left. Why must you hide it in fine print? Let us all know that you are going to have a stroke (/) columbarium stroke (/) childcare stroke (/) whatever we can always make up our mind after that right?

Why put it in fine print? it is the same as the Sim Lim Trader like that what. You are cheating us!

(Residents applause)

Dr Lam: I mean, Of course we can put every single uses, let say there is 1000, we will put 1000 and it will become a fine print ok? We will not argue that. So what I am trying to say is that Because one of the questions is that is HDB trying to hide. Of course it is not

John: Obviously it is. If you put it out, do you think how many of us will apply for the flat here. How many?

(Loud applause from residents)

Dr. Lam: Ok let me finish. Because like I said, you know, even childcare centre or kindergarten alright? We have faced resistance also and one of the reasons that I often receive, “my child has grown, I don’t need a childcare centre”, as simple as that ok? Because to the resident she doesn’t need it.

John: As I said, if you build a childcare centre now, all of us will shout yes!

(residents applause)

Dr. Lam: Of course some people will want, some people will not.

John: Or you can put as a kindergarten we also say yes!

(A resident shouted ‘wet market’)

Oh yes, wet market dry market, hawker centre, we all say yes!

(Another resident cuts in with his question and Dr. Lam did not reply to John’s comment.)

What a disgrace to all John Tans! He is as bad as this John Tan. Too confrontational and clearly wrong vision.

john_tan.jpg
 
Re: One question about Fernvale dialogue session.

He should indeed be seated with the residents and helping them to address their concerns, since he is supposedly working for the residents to try and make their lives better. ;)

Why is Lam Pin Min, the servant of Fernvale sitting along with the reps from HDB, URA and Lifecorp?

Isn't he suppose to sit with the residents and raise questions against them instead?
 
Back
Top