- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 120
- Points
- 0
Her peers and the SG Medical Council disagree with you. Her case is still on. She has been convicted of 94 cases of professional misconduct. Did she break the law? Let's wait for verdict of her appeal.
There are legal and moral responsibilities for a person. Whether she broke the law or not it's for the High Court to judge. But obviously from her initial conviction, SMC surmised that she has broken legally and morally.
LKY defended his obscene pay rise legally as he was able to push it through parliament. that gave him a legal mandate. But he lost the fight morally.
Did you say "has been convicted of 94 cases of professional misconduct". If it is true it seems that's hell alot of instances of professional misconduct? What are the convicted professionasl misconduct? Malpractices? Professional Negligence in the discharge of her medical services? The gist of her prosecution by the SMC seems to boil down to her how she charges the Sultan in looking after her late sister. You asked the question "Did she break the law?". Well, as you have already said she has been convicted it denoted that she has broken the law if not how can she be classified as such. I know of no learned mind on the bench that has yet to convict her on those 94 cases of professional misconduct. Have I miss out some report. Care to up-date me on it. Much obliged, lady for that up-dating. Thanks
No quarrel with the first sentence of para 2. Allow me to say that what you said must also apply to the Sultan. Agreed? As for the rest of that para it seems that you hold the notion that she has already been properly convicted through legal process. Remember, SMC only serves as as discipline board and do not have the judicial power of the Court. The only saving grace for SMC is the moral issue. So he who as no sin can cast the first stone, so say Christ. No? I will not go that far as you to view Susan has been duly convicted. You must have your reason to form that view. I can only urge you to be fair to your fellow country woman in this case.
On what you say in the last para, LKY will defend anything that don't speak well of him be it right or wrong. Well, his claimed of that obscene pay indeed if it is lawful will not be a standing joke for all even in the international arena. The only point I am with you is the last sentence of the para. At least we are ad consensus in that thinking. Lets leave it to the one above to adjudge him for what he is worth. There is nothing for us to add and any way what is there to add when it's the truth.
Last edited: