Not so sure. He made police report jointly with son.
Whatever the case, family honour has been misplaced.
Investment banker daughter buy fake watch from Shanghai street vendor.
Son not sure which wallets are his.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Liew Mun Leong Billion Dollars Temasek Reputation Has Been Rubbished
- Thread starter JurongEast
- Start date
Not so sure. He made police report jointly with son.
Whatever the case, family honour has been misplaced.
Investment banker daughter buy fake watch from Shanghai street vendor.
Son not sure which wallets are his.
"Coupled with the existence of an improper motive by members of the Liew family for mounting the allegations against Parti, I find that the convictions against Parti are unsafe and accordingly acquit her of all the charges."
- JUDGE CHAN SENG ONN
- JUDGE CHAN SENG ONN
All of you must be dumb to not realise Indonesia's threat to Sg to overturn the conviction, otherwise a severe bottleneck on maid supply.
Throwing LML under the bus is a small price to pay as we all can see that they are after all a family of scums. He deserves his up commence. And pro-bono lawyer....my toes laugh.
comeuppance lah. “up commence” means he gets promoted again.
Minister of Law is quiet
See? MoM issued advisory/caution against Mrs. Liew and Karl Liew, but not to LML himself.
Police, Manpower Ministry looking into case of ex-maid acquitted of stealing from CAG chief in light of judge's comments
Miss Parti Liyani and her lawyer Anil Balchandani leaving the Supreme Court building after she was acquitted of stealing from Changi Airport Group Liew Mun Leong and his family, on Sept 4, 2020.PHOTO: HUMANITARIAN ORGANISATION FOR MIGRATION ECONOMICS
Dominic Low
SINGAPORE - Both the Ministry of Manpower and the police are looking into the case of a former domestic worker acquitted of stealing from Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong and his family.
In a statement on Sunday (Sept 6), MOM said that it is in consultation with the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) as to whether further action, if any, ought to be taken following comments by the judge, Justice Chan Seng Onn.
The police also said on Sunday night that they would be looking into several observations of police investigations made by Justice Chan in his 100-page judgment on the case.
While the statement by police did not elaborate on what these observations were, Justice Chan had found that there was a break in the chain of custody of evidence, creating reasonable doubt as to whether some of the allegedly stolen items discovered by the family were accurately documented by the photographs taken by the police some five weeks later.
During this period, the family were told by the police that they were free to use the items. They took and put back items into the boxes but it is not clear if the items that were put back were the same ones removed earlier.
Justice Chan also found that two statements were taken from the former maid, Ms Parti Liyani, without an interpreter.
"Several observations about police's investigations have been raised," said the police in its statement. "The police are looking into them."
Meanwhile, MOM also explained how it had dealt with Ms Parti's complaint that she had been asked to work at the home and office of Mr Liew's son.
In October 2017, Ms Parti made a report of illegal deployment by Mr Liew's wife to their son Mr Karl Liew's residence between September and October 2016, and to his office around 2012 and 2013.
MOM investigated her complaint and found that this had happened on different occasions, it said.
"At the conclusion of the investigation in May 2018, the Ministry issued a caution to Mrs Liew and an advisory to Mr Karl Liew. The issuing of a caution, on these facts, is consistent with the approach taken in other similar cases," it said.
Ms Parti, 46, who worked for the Liew family from 2007 to 2016, was accused of stealing over $34,000 worth of items from them.
After a trial, she was found guilty on four counts of theft and sentenced to two years and two months' jail in March last year.
She appealed to the High Court against her conviction and sentence, and was acquitted last Friday.
The statements from MOM and the police come after the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) said earlier on Sunday that it would be studying Justice Chan's judgment to assess what further action, if any, ought to be taken in the case.
"His findings do raise questions which warrant further investigations," the AGC said.
Police, Manpower Ministry looking into case of ex-maid acquitted of stealing from CAG chief in light of judge's comments
Miss Parti Liyani and her lawyer Anil Balchandani leaving the Supreme Court building after she was acquitted of stealing from Changi Airport Group Liew Mun Leong and his family, on Sept 4, 2020.PHOTO: HUMANITARIAN ORGANISATION FOR MIGRATION ECONOMICS
Dominic Low
SINGAPORE - Both the Ministry of Manpower and the police are looking into the case of a former domestic worker acquitted of stealing from Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong and his family.
In a statement on Sunday (Sept 6), MOM said that it is in consultation with the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) as to whether further action, if any, ought to be taken following comments by the judge, Justice Chan Seng Onn.
The police also said on Sunday night that they would be looking into several observations of police investigations made by Justice Chan in his 100-page judgment on the case.
While the statement by police did not elaborate on what these observations were, Justice Chan had found that there was a break in the chain of custody of evidence, creating reasonable doubt as to whether some of the allegedly stolen items discovered by the family were accurately documented by the photographs taken by the police some five weeks later.
During this period, the family were told by the police that they were free to use the items. They took and put back items into the boxes but it is not clear if the items that were put back were the same ones removed earlier.
Justice Chan also found that two statements were taken from the former maid, Ms Parti Liyani, without an interpreter.
"Several observations about police's investigations have been raised," said the police in its statement. "The police are looking into them."
Meanwhile, MOM also explained how it had dealt with Ms Parti's complaint that she had been asked to work at the home and office of Mr Liew's son.
In October 2017, Ms Parti made a report of illegal deployment by Mr Liew's wife to their son Mr Karl Liew's residence between September and October 2016, and to his office around 2012 and 2013.
MOM investigated her complaint and found that this had happened on different occasions, it said.
"At the conclusion of the investigation in May 2018, the Ministry issued a caution to Mrs Liew and an advisory to Mr Karl Liew. The issuing of a caution, on these facts, is consistent with the approach taken in other similar cases," it said.
Ms Parti, 46, who worked for the Liew family from 2007 to 2016, was accused of stealing over $34,000 worth of items from them.
After a trial, she was found guilty on four counts of theft and sentenced to two years and two months' jail in March last year.
She appealed to the High Court against her conviction and sentence, and was acquitted last Friday.
The statements from MOM and the police come after the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) said earlier on Sunday that it would be studying Justice Chan's judgment to assess what further action, if any, ought to be taken in the case.
"His findings do raise questions which warrant further investigations," the AGC said.
she can help sell all the fake goods from the liew household. this liew family very crassy. make millions but not willing to pay for more maids nor for genuine luxury items. show off with fake watches. truly xia xuay.
if she’s a slender chiobu sure can ask for $69k. otherwise, teeko sinkie unkers not interested in story. only trannies and cross dressers may be interested. very tiny market.better off for her to sell her Story to the highest bidder
this is the bullying culture started by lky followed by his son loong and daughter in law ching. it has become a pattern in singapore society
She can sell her panty because the billionaire son Karl Liew Kai Lung wears her panty. I believe her bra and panty still has Kar Liew DNA
Last edited:
i think her bra and panties are too large for him.
Silence please. Meeting with Ho Ching and Calvin Cheng in progress.
Halimah kicked up a fuss over Tang's/hijab matter.
Is this not a very much more serious matter; even saying things like
"I am glad every mother and his dog is seriously looking into the matter" ?
mom already gives warning to karl’s mom for multi-deployment of a single maid in multi properties. most likely the mom (not the ministary) will becum scrapgoat.
That looked to be the case when MOM first handled the case going by today's front page ST report on this matter. LML's wife and son Karl only got a warning for using maid beyond contract duties. MOM had to quickly qualify this with a statement saying this was a consistent enforcement action as per previous cases. Yeah right, all depends how deep MOM looked into this matter prior to this explosive revelation in the High Court judgment.
Now MOM seems to be scrambling to take cover.
Unless the heat turns into fire. Then only exception probably being LHL and family and maybe a few select others like TCH, TT, GCT...
Classic case of hubris.
This piece of shit LML thought no end of himself, probably considered himself a mini LKL/GKS/LKS wrapped in one. Got the cheek and call to act like some sort of Confucian management guru, when in real life he is just a greedy rapacious cunning scumbag. Typical pap elite establishment product.
Typical pap system of governce in place which is a glaring systemic flaw in our system of governce. Own self check own self. Yeah right.
TT Durai's case mirrors this present case to a certain extent. In Durai's case it was only when GCT stepped down as PM that Durai finally became vulnerable as his prime shield Mrs GCT no longer carried the implicit clout if the PMOs office anymore.
Fact that ST has been going all out against LML and family ever since the High Court judgment on Friday culminating in today's ST front page attack on LML and family says a heck of a lot ie PAP top elites have signaled that it is now open season on LML and family, he and his family have been shafted.
Ho Ching poor judge of character.very good question Indeed.
better to leave this question unanswered
Publicly backed TT Durai before.
LML probably apple polished HC well.
Similar threads
