• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Liew Mun Leong Billion Dollars Temasek Reputation Has Been Rubbished

Liew Mun Leong and family dishonest and lying bunch found out by courts to frame a poor Indonesian maid trying to make an honest living.
Her lawyer should now sue him for distress and loss of earnings. A million dollars should suffice for her trauma aftet all he still has millions earned from doing nothing in SIA.
No wonder GLCs are failing and going bankrupt because of all these leeches abusing their position.
 
From Yahoo news:

Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong's maid acquitted of theft: High Court


SINGAPORE — A domestic helper accused of stealing belongings from the household of Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong was acquitted of all four theft charges on Friday (4 September), with a High Court judge finding that the Liew family may have had an “improper motive” in filing a police report against her.

When Indonesian Parti Liyani, 46, was informed of the decision to terminate her employment, she had threatened to file a complaint against the Liew family for assigning her cleaning duties outside of Liew’s house – she had been asked to clean the home and office of Liew’s son, Karl. In turn, the Liew family could have filed a police report two days after Parti had been placed on a plane back to Indonesia.

Parti had been convicted and sentenced to 26 months’ jail in the State Courts over stealing items worth more than $34,000 from Liew’s household. These items belonged to Liew, Karl, Karl’s wife Heather Lim Mei Ern, and Liew’s daughter May Liew Cheng.

In overturning her conviction, Justice Chan Seng Onn said, “Given the seriousness of the consequences that might follow from what Parti said she would do, I have reason to believe that the Liew family would be very concerned that Parti would carry out her threat to report the matter to MOM (Ministry of Manpower).”

“I find that the Prosecution has failed to dispel the reasonable doubt raised by the Defence and show that there was no improper motive by Mr Liew and Karl in making the police report.”

The judge said that the family could have taken the “preemptive first step to terminate her employment suddenly” so that she would not have time to pack and hence make her complaint.

Said Justice Chan, “The Liew family followed up with a police report to ensure her return would be prevented. In my view, the Liew family might not have made a police report had Parti not made her express threat on 28 October 2016 to report the matter to MOM.”

Delay in securing items in question
Among his reasons for overturning Parti’s conviction, the judge also raised the break in the chain of custody of evidence and called into question Karl Liew’s credibility as a prosecution witness.

There was a delay in securing the ‘stolen’ items between the time they were discovered on 29 October and 3 December 2016 when photos were taken of them, the judge noted. As a result, the Liew family was able to take the items out for daily use, which could have resulted in a mix up.

On Karl Liew, the judge said that he was “not only lacking in credibility but did not take process of giving evidence seriously”. He added that Karl Liew’s evidence was contradictory and inconsistent with other witnesses.

That Karl Liew had in his possession multiple female clothing that Parti allegedly stole from him was “highly suspect” said Justice Chan, especially given how the clothes were observed to be “smaller-sized”.

The judge noted that many items that were allegedly stolen were of a poor condition, such as a pair of Gucci sunglasses with a red stain and a frayed Prada bag. He stated that the District Judge had failed to consider that the unchallenged expert witnesses’ account of the authenticity of three watches, two of which were counterfeit, and the last one a free gift.

Thus, Justice Chan found it unsafe to convict Parti.

Following the acquittal, Parti’s pro bono lawyer, Anil Balchandani told the court that his client will be seeking compensation from the Liew family, which will take into account her loss of income in the four years she was unable to work while the court case was pending. The lawyer estimated the loss to be “several tens of thousands”.

Throughout her case, Parti had been staying at a shelter run by migrant worker advocacy group Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics. Parti, who gave emotional hugs to her supporters and lawyer, appeared relieved when she was given the acquittal.

Speaking to reporters through an interpreter outside the court, Parti, who is single, said that she intends to return to Indonesia to be with her mother.

“I’m so glad that I’m finally free. I’ve been fighting for four years now and I have been strong all this while,” said Parti.

However, she will not be able to return immediately, as she still faces one pending charge for fraudulent possession of stolen items from unknown victims. Balchandani said that he was ready to challenge the charge.


Of her lawyer’s help, Parti said that she was “very grateful” and did not know how to pay him back.

Case background
Parti had been employed by the Liew family for over nine years until she was dismissed on 28 October 2016, with Karl Liew and two representatives from her employment agency giving her two hours to pack before she was to be sent back to her home country. With the aid of the family’s two drivers, Parti then packed her belongings into three jumbo boxes which she requested that Karl Liew send to her address in Indonesia.
The items included a DVD player valued at $1,000, two Longchamp bags worth $400, a Gerald Genta watch worth $10,000, two white iPhone 4 smartphones with accessories valued at $2,056, 115 pieces of clothing valued at $150 each, and a $500 blanket.
A day after Parti left however, the family decided to open the boxes and found what they claimed to be their belongings within it. Karl Liew and his father filed a police report on 30 October 2016.
On 2 December 2016, Parti returned to Singapore and was arrested at the airport, where she was found in possession of more items that allegedly belonged to the Liew family.
Parti appealed the conviction and sentencing in the High Court. The defence argued that Parti had bought some items; and that some items were given to her and some items she found after they were discarded; and that the rest of the items were not packed by her.
 
Loofydralb said:
Liew Mun Leong and family dishonest and lying bunch found out by courts to frame a poor Indonesian maid trying to make an honest living.
Her lawyer should now sue him for distress and loss of earnings. A million dollars should suffice for her trauma aftet all he still has millions earned from doing nothing in SIA.
No wonder GLCs are failing and going bankrupt because of all these leeches abusing their position.
Click to expand...
Lodging a false police report is a serious offence under the Penal Code. Especially one in which the accused have to go to jail. AGC’s silence is deafening. They must charge both father and son asap. But I suspect they won’t, for obvious reasons. Liew junior is a fucking disgrace. The apple did not fall far from the tree.
 
GoldenDragon said:
Lodging a false police report is a serious offence under the Penal Code. Especially one in which the accused have to go to jail. AGC’s silence is deafening. They must charge both father and son asap. But I suspect they won’t, for obvious reasons. Liew junior is a fucking disgrace. The apple did not fall far from the tree.
Click to expand...

Absolutely agree and I am with you on this. :thumbsup:
 
So Liew Mun Leong son Karl Liew Kai Lung is a faggot who wear his maid panties and bra ?
 
mahjongking said:
what is it about rich people's kids?
too much fucking free time? or not enough national service?
all kinds of kinky stuff, cheebye, make them serve 5 years NS to wake up their ideas
Click to expand...


Metro founder's grandson on trial for drug-related charges



jenn.jpg



Ong Jenn, the 41-year-old grandson of Metro founder Ong Tjoe Kim & the son of its former group MD Jopie Ong, arrives at the State Courts on Feb 3, 2017.






jenn1_0.jpg



Ong Jenn the grandson of Metro founder Ong Tjoe Kim & the son of its former group MD Jopie Ong, arrives at the State Courts with his wife on Feb 3, 2017.




SINGAPORE - A scion of the family that founded retail giant Metro Holdings appeared in court on Friday (Feb 3) morning to face drug-related charges.

Ong Jenn, the 41-year-old grandson of Metro founder Ong Tjoe Kim and the son of its former group managing director Jopie Ong, is represented by Senior Counsel Tan Chee Meng.

Ong was first charged on Nov 1, 2014 with trafficking in cannabis, as well as possession and consumption of the drug.

He is currently on trial for two of the eight drug-related charges against him.

Ong is accused of engaging in a conspiracy with a man known as Mohamad Ismail Abdul Majid to traffick a controlled drug.

Ong faces the possibility of jail time and caning if he is found guilty of the various charges he faces.

Mohamad Ismail was allegedly found to be in possession of a block of 92.68g of vegetable matter later found to be cannabis near a bus stop along Jurong Port Road at around 4.20pm on Oct 30, 2014.

Mohamad Ismail was also allegedly found to be in possession of one block containing 385.1g of fragmented vegetable matter later found to be a cannabis mixture.

Ong's remaining six charges have been stood down.

According to his online profile, Ong has been a business development manager at Metro Holdings since 2003. He attended Boston University's School of Management from 1996 to 2000.

He is also the founder and director of Tompang, a peer-to-peer retail platform operator. Metro Holdings was founded in 1957 by Mr Ong Tjoe Kim. It started out as a textile store at 72 High Street and
is today a property development and investment group with a turnover of $145.8 million and net assets of $1.4 billion as of March 31 2015.

Ong's father, Mr Jopie Ong, was group managing director from 1973 until his death in February last year. It was under his leadership that Metro grew from a two-storey shophouse into a retail behemoth
and, later, a substantial property player with interests in China, Japan and Britain.
 
Liew Mun Leong's silence is deafening. Still no public comment.
This is the guy who is reported to have his yearly performance bonus
in the tens of millions. But uses ONE paid for three locations?

Why has he not been hauled up by MOM since the case surface?

Money does not buy class, as we all know.
 
PAP will pro
Confuseous said:
Liew Mun Leong's silence is deafening. Still no public comment.
This is the guy who is reported to have his yearly performance bonus
in the tens of millions. But uses ONE paid for three locations?

Why has he not been hauled up by MOM since the case surface?

Money does not buy class, as we all know.
Click to expand...
PAP will protect its cronies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Coolie Genes Teeko Pek Jailed for Molesting SYTs on Buses!
Replies
12
Views
1K
k1976
k1976
Hightech88
Leong Mun Wai steps down as PSP chief to 'take responsibility' for Pofma order
Replies
2
Views
931
k1976
k1976
Scrooball (clone)
Serious Pofma order issued to Leong Mun Wai (Cheebye didn't check facts before posting!)
Replies
16
Views
2K
k1976
k1976
rocket
Hin Leong oil tycoon OK Lim, 82, sentenced to 17.5 years' jail
2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
jurongkechil
J
LITTLEREDDOT
Karl Liew lied: $5,000 fine. Lee Hsien Yang (and wife) lied: fugitives
Replies
0
Views
2K
LITTLEREDDOT
LITTLEREDDOT
Back
Top