• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious It's Official! CECA Creates Good Jobs For Sinkies! PAP Rebuts PSP Lies! Oppie Bock Really Lose Face Today!

Theindependent​

Mr Ong added that he is “quite puzzled by the PSP’s motion” and alleged that Mr Leong “has persisted in linking this issue falsely with FTAs and CECA” even after the debate in Jul.
Screen-Shot-2021-09-01-at-1.43.31-PM.png
Leong Mun Wai, Ong Ye Kung. Photos from Facebook.
Author
- Advertisement -
Singapore — Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Leong Mun Wai from Progress Singapore Party announced that a debate over jobs and the foreign talent policy will take place this month, and it appears that Ong Ye Kung did not take to it kindly.
In Jul, Mr Ong, sought to clarify Singapore’s Free Trade Agreements in his capacity as a former trade negotiator in a lengthy debate in Parliament.
The Health Minister noted in a Facebook post that the PSP “appears intent on carrying on its campaign against CECA,” the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement to strengthen bilateral trade between Singapore and India.
Mr Leong wrote in a Tuesday morning (Aug 31) Facebook post about the upcoming #PSPJobsDebate, which should take place on Sept 13 or 14.

He wrote, “The Motion we have submitted is: That this Parliament calls upon the Government to take urgent and concrete action to address the widespread anxiety among Singaporeans on jobs and livelihood caused by the Foreign Talent Policy and the movement of natural persons provisions in some free trade agreements like CECA.”

The NCMP emphasised that CECA is not PSP’s “main concern,” but improving the jobs and livelihood of Singaporeans is the main focus of the debate.
- Advertisement -
Mr Leong wrote in his post that while Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had addressed concerns over foreign work pass holders in his National Day Rally speech on Sunday night, there was no mention of “concrete policies that would resolve the problem fundamentally.”
“We will continue to urge the Government to take the issues of the displacement and discrimination of Singaporeans seriously and implement concrete policies to address the problems urgently. As the Government has not answered most of the 23 parliamentary questions that we have filed for data, we will be entering the debate with incomplete information,” he added.
On his part, Mr Ong wrote that the government “understands” people’s anxieties over competing with foreign workers for jobs. But he countered that PM Lee had announced “concrete policies to address the challenges faced by our workers” in his speech on Sunday.
He added that he is “quite puzzled by the PSP’s motion” and alleged that Mr Leong “has persisted in linking this issue falsely with FTAs and CECA” even after the debate in Jul.
- Advertisement -
Mr Ong then proceeded to enumerate the points he and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng made in the debate, pointing out that Mr Leong “had seemed to acknowledge these points,” although the NCMP had said PSP needs time to assess if CECA is beneficial to Singapore workers.
“Unfortunately, the PSP appears intent on carrying on its campaign against CECA. As PM cautioned at NDR, this campaign carries a strong racist undertone, and has impacted not only Indian nationals here, but our own local-born Indians.
The Government will consider how to address the PSP’s motion during the upcoming Parliament sitting,” wrote Mr Ong. /TISG
- Advertisement -
Follow us on Social Media
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Telegram
  • Email
Send in your scoops to [email protected]
 
Oppie "Not Anyone's MP" Leong squirms like a cockroach when his lies gets exposed! Go Ye Kung go!

View attachment 115610

Ong asks two questions of PSP members
Ong went next, and asked the PSP members if they agreed with the following two statements:

The FTAs, including CECA, are fundamental to Singapore's economic survival.

CECA does not allow a free flow of Indian PMEs into Singapore. This is a falsehood and a gross misunderstanding of the agreement.


He added that if they agree to the above-mentioned statements, he believes that they will have a "meaningful debate" when they table the motion.

Need further debate and study on CECA: Leong
Leong did not give definitive answers to Ong's questions, and said that it required further "debate" and "study".

But he added that he and Poa are "for FTAs" and accepted that jobs and livelihoods are not being used as "bargaining chips", and they were reassured that Singaporeans' interests are being taken care of.

However, he maintained that he needs more time to study the numbers provided about CECA before deciding whether it's beneficial for the country.

At least some common ground established: Ong
Ong then said that at least some common ground has been established, and that PSP agrees that FTAs are inclusive and fundamental to Singapore's economic survival.

Second, he said that PSP at least agreed that the net movement of natural persons in CECA is not used as a bargaining chip, and that there is no "free-flow" of Indian professionals into Singapore.

He said these two points represented good common ground, but that it must mean that PSP must take back their allegations that CECA has led to an unfettered flow of Indian professionals into Singapore.

Regrettable, but must accept their feelings: Ong
Leong again said that he is not sure whether CECA has contributed to an influx of foreign talent into Singapore, and PSP doesn't agree at this stage that CECA is beneficial to Singapore.

After this, Ong said that he thinks that he is "waffling" and that it is "quite hard to catch", thus concluded that Leong is not going to withdraw his allegations on CECA.

He added that it is regrettable if Leong continues with his allegations, because "generations of FTA negotiators [have] worked very hard to make sure our interests are all protected".

Ong said this is not a backdoor, and not a method for unfettered access, and added, "I take it that this is PSP's position, notwithstanding hearing all our explanation. This is most regrettable but we will have to accept how they feel."

https://mothership.sg/2021/07/after...ment-was-not-used-as-bargaining-chip-in-ceca/

This beedio say Singapore IQ110 highest got dumb stupid ministers need India with 1Q82 only to create jobs?

hey, Tannie, maybe Foreign Tenants create low tenant occupants rate for PAP cronies investors say so....

 
The other elephant in the room r the mudlanders.

Theindependent​

Screen-Shot-2021-02-16-at-2.30.45-PM.png
AFP / ROSLAN RAHMAN
- Advertisement -
Singapore — In a letter to the Independent Singapore, a 58-year-old man wrote in advising Singaporeans not to apply for a PMET job, and to take the “PAP’s advice and become a hawker, Grab driver, food delivery, security guard, cleaner or some s**t”.
The Singaporean man, who wished to remain anonymous, added that he recently was working at a bank for 8 years.
The department he was working at had 20 employees.
He wrote: “Suddenly in 2019, the head office in Malaysia decided to fill 5 vacancies with Malaysians. They just appeared overnight and it seemed the administrative hurdles, if any, for them to be able to work in Singapore were pretty low to clear”.
- Advertisement -
He added that when one of the Malaysian employees decided to apply for a Singapore PR, she was able to obtain it within 6 months. However, the company decided to transfer her back to Kuala Lumpur. In order to keep her PR status, he wrote that the woman resigned from the bank and “immediately found another job in Singapore”.
He added that the incident had “nothing to do with CECA and yet happened within one department in the bank. There are many other “inter corporate transfers” in other departments of the same bank”.
The disgruntled man wrote: “I would advise all Singaporeans to forget about applying for any PMET job in Singapore. You will do well to take up the PAP’s advice and become a hawker, Grab driver, food delivery, security guard, cleaner or some s**t”.
“If you do not want to do that and want to wish for a PMET job, vote out this government. There is simply no other option”, he said.
- Advertisement -
Last week, in answering questions in Parliament about the free trade pact, Health Minister Ong Ye Kung said: “I emphasise and underline and highlight this: Nothing in the agreement implies Singapore must unconditionally let in professionals, managers, and executives (PMEs) from India”.
He added that the Government retains full rights to decide who can enter the country to live, work or become permanent residents or citizens. /TISG
Follow us on Social Media
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Telegram
  • Email
Send in your scoops to [email protected]
Tags: PMET
- Advertisement -
 
Then how come changi business park full of ceca ,n how come dbs full of cece, does it show that sinkies not capable of the jobs ? or is it sg education system is a failure?
Later the ministars tell you these are jobs shun by Sinkies :eek::eek::eek:
 

What exactly are Singaporeans angry about CECA?​

by The Online Citizen
03/09/2021
in Opinion
Reading Time: 7 mins read
80
Gov’t continues to issue motherhood statements on CECA, but how does it actually benefit the average Singaporean?
Prime Minister of India, Shri Narendra Modi, meeting Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the Istana in Singapore on 1 June 2018



by Joseph Nathan
As the saying goes, “A good government consistently listen and address the concerns of its citizens and not blame or prosecute them for stating the obvious”. I hope that our government will address what is contentiously wrong about the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA).
Singaporeans are generally not against the standardized Free Trade Agreement (FTA) as we know well it can help us economically when trading with our FTA’s partners, provided they are fairly negotiated.
We are also not against any specific nationality as many of our parents and grandparents were migrants themselves, and know well that foreign workers and foreign direct investments (FDI) remain critical to our economic prosperity, as long as they do not upset our socio-economic balance, infrastructure, and public healthcare.


















Yes, we also acknowledged that Singapore needs domestic and blue collared foreign workers for strenuous jobs in general construction & manufacturing, cleaning & waste disposal, and other general works, provided there are sufficient safeguards to manage our social balance as we can ill-afford another Little India Riot.
But when it comes to CECA, signed between India and Singapore in 2005, Singaporeans remained enraged by the stupidity and gullibility of those involved in drafting and negotiating this agreement that is so detrimental to our Singapore Workforce.
With a provision for “Intra Corporate Transfer”, what this means it that the Indians can utilize their FDIs to create lucrative job and business opportunities for themselves right in our own backyard, almost effortlessly.
Over time, they too learnt from their Chinese and other South East Asian counterparts on how to legally circumvent our ill-conceived manpower quota and qualification guidelines.
We have witnessed the exodus of villages of Indians into Singapore and watch helplessly as they conveniently plant their roots into our economic success and inevitably drove up our public housing cost and overloaded our infrastructure, public healthcare & socio-economic balance.

If those involved in the CECA agreement can so stupid and naïve to give the Indians numerous loopholes to game our economic success, Singaporeans like myself do not blame the Indians and their politicians for taking advantage of us but are angry at them for trading away a substantial part of our economic success and employment opportunities so foolishly.
This is the core issue that many Singaporeans are angry about and it has got nothing to do with race or nationality.

Xenophobic and racism – who is playing with fire?

When some government officials start labelling Singaporeans as racist or xenophobic for raising their displeasure over CECA, they inadvertently created an unwarranted tension between Singaporeans and Indian professionals working in Singapore when CECA was never an issue of race or nationality.

In doing so, those 4G politicians of the PAP are in fact recklessly sowing discourse between Singaporeans and nationalities from South Asia.
As such, aren’t the actions of the 4G politicians xenophobic, racist, and reckless?
After playing the race card, they now plan to introduce more laws at workplace but for what exactly – to curtail discussion or to target another of their imagined discrimination?

Importance of defending our Singaporean Workforce

It is heartening to note that the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) has been tenacious in holding the 4G politicians of the PAP to accountability by tabling motion on jobs for debate in parliament for the sake of our Singaporean Workforce.
After years of empty promises, we seriously need to address the many policy gaps, failures, and outright stupidity of these politicians as tolerating them is no longer an option.
Instead of trying to defect the issues at hand by calling the action of the PSP a campaign against CECA when it is not, it is vital for our parliamentarians to find the courage in setting aside their political difference and start addressing these discrepancies that are destroying our Singaporean Core.
Think about it.
As India has a population of 1.366 billion or 234 times more than Singapore, this means that the provision for Intra Corporate Transfer already has a systemic bias that favours the Indian, to the delight of their politicians who are hard-pressed in creating employment of for their growing middle class.
With such a high pent up demand of Indians keen to seek employment outside of India, our trade negotiators, manpower planners and ministers involved ought to have exercised greater care when making provision for manpower transfer in the CECA or have the decency to right their wrongs.

The devil is in the details

It does not take any ingenuity from any Indian entrepreneur to incorporate a start-up in Singapore just to facilitate the transfer of eight to nine executives or professionals from India under agreement.
By incorporating more entities, either directly or indirectly, the same entrepreneur could marshal hundredths or even thousandths of Indian from India into Singapore under CECA and our weak regulatory framework on foreign workers.
Multiply this by a thousand and scale it across the other nationalities, you will now understand why our young graduates, PMETs, and entrepreneurs are losing out on employment and business opportunities to foreigners right in our own backyard.
The Indians, like their Chinese or Filipino counterparts before them, are simply having the time of their lives when our policy makers gifted them with our economic prosperity on a silver platter.
With the Chinese already in almost every facets of our economy, the Filipinos firmly entrenched in our retail, hospitality, and nursing sectors while the Indians have entrenched themselves in our IT, accounting, and financial sectors, what hope is there left for Singaporeans in the executive and professional positions in these sectors?
They have infiltrated our GLCs, and even our public sector, when jobs were outsourced to the lowest bidders without discretion.
For those wondering why our government and unions are suddenly encouraging our children to become hawkers or take up delivery jobs after we had invested monies, sweats, and sacrifices in their education, the answers are already inked on our walls.
It is not that our children or younger Singaporeans are weak or unable to fight for their employment opportunities.
Neither should we blame our teachers for giving our children an education that cannot land them well paying jobs when our politicians keep tilting our economic prosperity in favour of foreigners instead of our Singaporean Workforce.
But why?
Could it be that it is more lucrative for our government to be promoting employment for foreigners as there are obscene amount of levies to be collected, more dormitories to be rented and even lucrative micro-markets to cater to their daily needs?
Or could it be that our government may want to please their counterparts in India or China given our massive investments in these countries.
But if our foreign investments are not backed up by executives who are “street-smart”, able to respond to challenges and are prepared to get their hands dirty, our government is simply naïve and will end up losing on both ends.

Root cause of our unhappiness over CECA

CECA and our weak regulatory framework on foreign manpower are manifestations of a more troubling issue – we have become too tolerant of the incompetency of the 4G PAP politicians for far too long.
This is the root cause to many of the problems and hardships faced by our Singaporean Workforce.
As a result, it is looking like Singaporeans are doomed to be fit only to be drivers, couriers, cleaners, handymen, security guards, safe-distance ambassadors, temperature-takers, or hawkers to serve the needs of foreigners right on our shore which we called home.
Still trying to wonder why there is an increase in Malays in rental public housing or which ethnic group will be next?
To make matter worse, these politicians are not only naïve and gullible but have also become very arrogant and haughty when called to account for their actions.
Even if Lee Kuan Yew is alive today, he would have died many times over just by watching them make a mockery out of our economic success and prosperity.

Is there really a future for Singapore with the 4G politicians?

These are the hard truths as to why many Singaporeans are angry with our government.
By the same token, a segment of Singaporeans also have to blame themselves for these colossal failures when they keep giving those incompetent politicians blank cheques and free tickets into our parliament, again and again, instead of holding them responsible and accountable.
Think about it, even our Prime Minister has to rely on a 3G PAP politician to hold the ministerial portfolio for both the Home Affairs and the Law Ministry, and is having trouble picking a successor among them.
If the politicians from the 4G PAP are really that good as they want Singaporeans to believe, then why aren’t they helming these ministries or able to assure PM Lee to hand over his office to them by now?

Time to address the problems about CECA with sincerity

What we urgently need is for our government to acknowledge where they had gone wrong on CECA and our employment policy for foreign workforce, plugged the loopholes and introduce new legislations with greater urgency to safeguard our Singaporean Workforce against unfair discrimination, exploitation, and abuse.
Our government must also make a clear distinction between employment policies for Singaporeans and their overseas investments so that one will not be compromised for the sake of the other.
These should be debated vigorously in parliament if we are truly concerned about safeguarding and fortifying our Singaporean Core.
Singaporeans must start thinking seriously about our future as a nation and those of our children if we still believe that Singapore deserves better.
This was first published on Joseph Nathan’s Facebook page, and reproduced with permission.
 

Theindependent​

"It has got nothing to do with race or nationality."
Screen-Shot-2021-09-07-at-9.42.00-AM.png
FB screengrab: Joseph Nathan - Hard Truths of SG
Author
- Advertisement -
Singapore — A post claiming that the naïveté and gullibility of those who drafted CECA, the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement, are what most Singaporeans are angry about is being shared on Facebook.
Posting on the Joseph Nathan – Hard Truths of SG Facebook page on Sept 4, the author hopes the government will address what is “contentiously wrong” about CECA.
Mr Nathan begins his post by stating that Singaporeans are not against Free Trade Agreements or any specific nationality, and acknowledges that foreign workers and foreign direct investments are necessary for the economy.
But he takes exception to CECA, which he claims allows Indians to use foreign direct investments (FDI) “to create lucrative job and business opportunities for themselves right in our own backyard, almost effortlessly.”
- Advertisement -
He added that they’ve “learnt… how to legally circumvent our ill-conceived manpower quota and qualification guidelines.”
Mr Nathan assigned responsibility for this to “those involved in the CECA agreement” for giving “Indians numerous loopholes to game our economic success.”

However, he opined, “Singaporeans like myself do not blame the Indians and their politicians for taking advantage of us but are angry at them for trading away a substantial part of our economic success and employment opportunities so foolishly.

This is the core issue that many Singaporeans are angry about and it has got nothing to do with race or nationality.”
The author praised the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) for being “tenacious” in holding accountable the fourth generation (4G) leaders of the ruling People’s Action Party in tabling a motion on jobs for debate in Parliament.
“After years of empty promises, we seriously need to address the many policy gaps, failures and outright stupidity of these politicians as tolerating them is no longer an option,” he added.
- Advertisement -
In the latter part of his post, Mr Nathan further questioned the competence of the ruling leadership, claiming that tolerance for this incompetence is the “root cause to many of the problems and hardships faced by our Singaporean Workforce.”

“As a result, it is looking like Singaporeans are doomed to be fit only to be drivers, couriers, cleaners, handymen, security guards, safe-distance ambassadors, temperature-takers or hawkers to serve the needs of foreigners right on our shore which we called home,” he wrote.

He also questioned why a third-generation PAP leader helms both the Home Affairs and Law Ministries, asking, “If the politicians from the 4G PAP are really that good as they want Singaporeans to believe, then why aren’t they helming these ministries or able to assure PM Lee to hand over his office to them by now?”
Mr Nathan ended his post by writing that it’s “Time To Address The Problems About CECA With Sincerity:”

“What we urgently need is for our government to acknowledge where they had gone wrong on CECA and our employment policy for foreign workforce, plugged the loopholes and introduce new legislations with greater urgency to safeguard our Singaporean Workforce against unfair discrimination, exploitation and abuse.

Our government must also make a clear distinction between employment policies for Singaporeans and their overseas investments so that one will not be compromised for the sake of the other.

These should be debated vigorously in parliament if we are truly concerned about safeguarding and fortifying our Singaporean Core.”​

/TISG
- Advertisement -
Follow us on Social Media
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Telegram
  • Email
Send in your scoops to [email protected]
 


PAP explains CECA to sinkies after exposing PSP for their racism and false allegations about CECA.
 
ceca spike proteins more mutative than delta spikes? results can be found in how many sinkie lives are infected and destroyed.
 
The time to repent, for PAP is before the next GE.
It is very likely they will lose 2/3 majority come 2025.
By then it would be too late for them to change policies cause the only MPs left would be PAP clowns and bootlickers who would know nuts about running a cabinet
 
Theindependent
"... our aim was to raise these issues so that Singaporeans will be made more aware of them and decipher the truth behind some of these policies. In that respect, I feel we have achieved that goal."


Photo: YouTube screengrab / Leong Mun Wai
Author

- Advertisement -
Singapore — After last week’s marathon debate on jobs and foreign workers’ policies, Progress Singapore Party’s Leong Mun Wai took to Facebook to say that the “real” debate has just begun.

Mr Leong, PSP’s Non-Constituency Member of Parliament, filed a motion that centred around the “widespread anxiety among Singaporeans on jobs and livelihoods caused by the foreign talent policy” that was discussed in the Sept 14 debate.

The ten-hour debate got heated at times and even featured a ‘hot mic’ moment wherein Mr Leong was called “illiterate” by a PAP minister in a whispered comment.

In his most recent post, Mr Leong said that he and fellow PSP NCMP Ms Hazel Poa thanked those who followed the debate.

- Advertisement -
And for those who “remain unconvinced by our arguments,” he wrote that they hope “they will continue to follow the ‘Foreign Manpower and Population’ issue as it is of paramount importance to our survival as a nation.”

“From now, let’s change the term ‘Foreign Talent’ to ‘Foreign Manpower’ because we recognise now that not all work pass holders can be classified as foreign talent.”

He added that the “real debate has only just begun” even though the debate in Parliament is done.

The NCMP also made clear what he and Ms Poa set out to do.

“We did not come to this debate with the expectation of trumping it. Just as in a soccer match, when the referee, linesmen, and spectators are predominantly against you, the odds of winning are reduced. And when several players are assigned to mark you, there is fewer chances of scoring goals.
Actually, our aim was to raise these issues so that Singaporeans will be made more aware of them and decipher the truth behind some of these policies. In that respect, I feel we have achieved that goal.”
He also pointed out that if people want more similar debates, more opposition voices should be added in Parliament.

- Advertisement -
“We know that not only is the game on the pitch unfair, the game outside is worse. If Singaporeans wish for more #PSPJobsDebate-type debates, then it cannot be 83 against 2, it should be 11 against 11. With this unequal representation in numbers, it is difficult to hold them accountable as they have almost free rein in decision making, drowning out any voice of dissent.”

He underlined that what is needed is more sensitivity to “ground sentiments and lived experiences, to improve the lot of Singaporeans as many are struggling under the present economic climate,” as well as being “humble enough to explore alternatives offered by opposing voices, instead of brushing off these dissenting views just because they do not agree with you.”

He also thanked the “hundreds of Singaporeans” who helped him get the needed data for the debate, as well as the PSP Team who “provided great support” to him and Ms Poa. /TISG

- Advertisement -
Follow us on Social Media

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
Reddit
LinkedIn
Telegram
Email
Send in your scoops to [email protected]
- Advertisement -
 
Theindependent
Sense And Nonsense by Tan Bah Bah


Leong Mun Wai, Lawrence Wong. Photos from Facebook.
Author

- Advertisement -
Like other interested, well-behaved and kiasu Singaporeans staying at home while the Covid-19 daily cases surged and hit the 800s, I had time to watch Parliament live on Tuesday (Sept 14). Apart from toilet breaks, I followed the debate on jobs, foreign talent and free trade agreements all through the 13 hours. This is my humble straightforward report.

Lawrence Wong will be our next Prime Minister, surely
His frontline participation in the debate was a second, crucial test on his leadership skills as a 4G contender to succeed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. In the first still ongoing test, Wong has been seen as de facto leader of the Multi-Ministry Task Force handling the Covid-19 pandemic which was already a do-or-die mission. He has not buckled in the public spotlight of the MTF press conferences held to update Singaporeans on the battle against the virus and its variants.

In Tuesday’s lengthy Parliamentary debate, he gave a fairly well-crafted speech on his own motion, one of the two tabled. The other motion was that filed by the Progress Singapore Party’s NCMP Leong Mun Wai.

- Advertisement -
The PSP’s motion said job losses have been due to the overwhelming influx of foreigners. It called on the government to take some concrete action to restore the balance and address widespread anxiety among Singaporeans on jobs and livelihoods caused by our foreign talent policy and some provisions of FTAs, in particular CECA.

Wong said we cannot afford to change tack and send out the wrong signal that foreigners are not welcome. Singapore has to continue being open to foreign investment and talent in the quest to become a global hub. It will address the problems caused by structural dislocation or disappearing jobs.

His YNWA clincher (my opinion) in words that every Liverpool fan will identify with:

“I promise all Singaporeans especially those who are displaced. You will never be alone. We will continue to invest in your capabilities and skills, help you stay competitive and walk this journey with you through the rest of your career.” :

- Advertisement -
“When you walk through a storm

Hold your head up high

And don’t be afraid of the dark

At the end of a storm

- Advertisement -
There’s a golden sky

……Walk on, walk on

With hope in your heart

And you’ll never walk alone.”

Anfield anthem: You’ll Never Walk Alone
The curious case of Leong Mun Wai
Contrary to Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan’s off the cuff remark, the PSP NCMP is not illiterate. He is quite an achiever, having been a Singapore Overseas Merit Scholar. His career path is not unimpressive: MD of OCBC Securities, Director of Merrill Lynch HK and Investment Office at the GIC. His Parliamentary biography says: “At OCBC, Mun Wai was an industry leader in the local stockbroking industry where he led the company through multiple acquisitions and integration to become the top three stockbrokers in Singapore.”

To summarise: He is neither desk-bound nor tongue-tied. He meets people, he talks to them, he speaks in public. He cannot be what one may call reticent (an accusation once levelled by two 1G leaders at former Minister and NTUC secretary-general Lim Chee Onn).

So what happened on Tuesday exactly? I think he simply refused to be brow-beaten, under the patient but still ruthless pressure from Law Minister K Shanmugam. Yahoo Singapore carried an excellent detailed report on the exchanges. Just to give a sample of the to-ing and fro-ing:

(a)

“Shanmugam: And (Ong Ye Kung) has said that there is no free movement allowed and we are entitled to apply our work pass rules, and that this is how it has been operated… since CECA has come into force and likewise for the FTAs.

Which part of that statement does (Leong) disagree with?… Maybe he can look at these statements and say which part of it he disagrees with. Does he disagree that we have applied it this way? Does he say that the minister was lying in Parliament or does he say that the interpretation that the minister had given was inaccurate and that we should in fact be obliged to give free movement for all Indians into Singapore?

Leong: What I’m saying is that I’m focusing on the economic effect of those provisions. And looking at the economic effect, there are some initial doubts whether the movement is easier than what the Government has represented or not. But we still cannot come to a conclusion yet, because we need more data from the government and the government is withholding the data.”…

(b)

“Shanmugam: What is the meaning of the statement that ‘DBS is still without a homegrown CEO’? We are not talking about succession plans here. I’m just asking for an interpretation of Leong’s words.

Leong: What I was referring to was, at the point of appointment… he was still a foreigner. But anyway, when I made that statement, I was not, in any way, having Mr Piyush Gupta (DBS CEO) in mind. I was just talking about the many CEOs that DBS have got, and (it) never had a succession plan. That was the intention but okay, being one of the top lawyers in Singapore, maybe the Law Minister could make some interpretations and ask me in that way. ”

The more curious case of Vivian Balakrishnan
He made two unnecessary remarks which were inadvertently picked up during the debate between Manpower Minister Tan See Leng and Leong: “…he’s illiterate” and “Seriously, how did he get into RI?… Must have been a lousy school”.

The Foreign Minister has apologised for these remarks which went viral. Leong has accepted the apology.

Why did he have to open his mouth, in the first place?

Conclusion of this week’s column
Having Parliament live is possibly the best thing that has happened to Singapore politics. It will force our politicians to up their act (like not be caught unawares, unprepared or sleeping) and, at the same time, work out an unspoken code for civilised conduct. Debate with facts – and empathy and respect.

Tan Bah Bah, consulting editor of TheIndependent.Sg, is a former senior leader writer with The Straits Times. He was also managing editor of a local magazine publishing company.

Follow us on Social Media

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
Reddit
LinkedIn
Telegram
Email
Send in your scoops to [email protected]
- Advertisement -
 
Singapore grew prosperous because of free movement of skill and free trade.
You cannot have one without the other.
Once you become wealthy, go live elsewhere to reduce stress.
 
Back
Top