• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious It's Official! CECA Creates Good Jobs For Sinkies! PAP Rebuts PSP Lies! Oppie Bock Really Lose Face Today!

India has FTA only with Singapore.

No other country wants an FTA with India because they demand terms that are only beneficial to them, and damn the counter-party.

This proves Sinkies are fucked.
 
For these Cronies, when they lose few more seats in the next election will realised Ceca was a blessing for Sinkies, a wake up call.
Already another one went to oppie... let's put PAP as oppie party and get the taste of their own medicine. 1st go Lock up Loong...
 
Netizens question accuracy of data provided by Manpower Minister on job creation for local PMEs stronger than EPs in finance, infocomm - The Online Citizen Asia
Minister Tan See Leng only reveals 500 intra-corporate transferees from India for last year – a Covid year
While the number of Employment Passes (EPs) given out to foreigners in finance and infocomm sectors from 2005 to 2020 stands at 40 percent, but the amount of job created for local professionals, managers and executives (PMEs) in these two sectors are even higher, said Minister for Manpower Tan See Leng in Parliament on Tuesday (6 July).

In infocomm, the number of EPs went up by around 25,000, however, the number of job created for local PMEs was about 35,000.

As for finance, jobs for EPs stand at 20,000 while job creation for locals were at 85,000.

Dr Tan, who is also Second Minister for Trade and Industry, gave out these figures while delivering his ministerial statement in Parliament on foreign workforce policies.

Learn more
He also spent some time in speech refuting questions raised by opposition Progress Singapore Party’s Non-Constituency MPs Leong Mun Wai and Hazel Poa, who wanted to know if the growth in EP holders has negatively affected local PMEs.

“If the competition is not here, it will be outside. The competition will be helping other companies in other countries to beat ours here, and displace our workers,” he said.

As a reply to Ms Poa, Associate Professor Jamus Lim (Sengkang GRC) and Mr Saktiandi Supaat (Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC) on the breakdown of workforce numbers, Dr Tan revealed that out of about 177,000 EPs as of 2020, about 10 percent could be found in manufacturing and construction industries. The remaining are in services sector.

In the services sector, the infocomm and professional services sub-sectors accounted for about 19 percent each, while finance accounted for around 15 percent.

In fact, from 2005 to 2020, the number of EPs rose by around 112,000, while the number of local PMEs went up by more than 380,000 during the same period of time.

As to whether the growth in local PME job include Singaporeans, the Minister highlighted about the low citizen unemployment rate of around 3 percent over the last decade, and said that 87 percent of citizens were born in Singapore.

Foreigners needed to complement local workforce
Dr Tan also noted that foreign banks and infocomm companies that asked to create jobs in Singapore would still need foreign workers to complement the local workforce.

“The simple point is that while we have a good Singaporean talent pool, our pool is not large enough to fulfil all of the needs, the breath and the depth of these enterprises,” he said.

He added, “The misconception is that if we say ‘no’ to the foreigners coming in… these jobs they would have taken would therefore all go to Singaporeans… Today, even as we speak, we still have about 22,000 PME jobs that are not filled. Companies are desperate to fill these jobs. They would love to take in Singaporeans if they could, because they would be more productive.”

Based on this, Dr Tan then asked Mr Leong to “think deeply”, “deliberate and offer some advice”.

Dr Tan said, “If we tell companies which want to invest in Singapore that they can only employ Singaporeans, or first employ Singaporeans who have been displaced, regardless of skills, I think the answer will be quite stark. They, I think, would opt not to come into Singapore to invest.”

He added that to make sure local employees can compete fairly, work pass controls are in place so foreigners do “not come to Singapore just because they are cheaper to hire than locals”.

He also mentioned about the progressive tightening and raising of quotas and levies at the work permit and S Pass levels, even though businesses had pushed for the rules to be relaxed over the past decade.

Dr Tan expressed that quotas and levies are not implemented on EPs because there is already strong competition for global talent and worldwide scarcity in areas like technology and digital skills.

“A quota would be hard cap that would limit our ability to compete at the high end of the global economy, while for a levy to have any effect at all on EP numbers, it would have to be set very high and would substantially increase business costs.”

Responding to earlier points made by Mr Leong on employers of foreign EP holders not required to make Central Provident Fund (CPF) contribution, Dr Tan said it is not right for the Government to make them responsible for their retirement fund and home ownership needs since they will not be permanently staying in Singapore.

“As foreign PMEs… are not working in Singapore on a permanent basis, I don’t think we should be responsible for their retirement adequacy or home ownership needs. Hence I don’t think it makes sense for us to extend our CPF benefits and coverage to them,” said Dr Tan.

“Instead, when reviewing qualifying salary to maintain a level playing field, we take into account CPF contributions as part of the cost to employers.”

Netizens react
Over on social media, netizens questioned the accuracy of data provided by Dr Tan that showed that job creation for local PMEs in infocomm and finance sectors are stronger compared to the number of EPs issued for foreigners in these sectors. Penning their thoughts in the Facebook page of The Straits Times, online users asked for the proper data to be released, with full breakdown of how many permanent resident (PR), EP and citizens are included in the figure mentioned by Dr Tan.


Others asked how many of these local PMEs who managed to secure employment (as mentioned by that Dr Tan) include PR, or are EPs who have converted to Singapore citizen.


Others pointed out that as long as EPs are getting paid low, they will always be more favourable for employers. As such, this will again cost local Singaporeans their job as they will not be able to accept such low wage due to the high cost of living here.


A couple of netizens questioned the quality of jobs created for citizens here. They wondered if senior roles were given to local PMEs or the EPs, adding that more data should be given on the number of Singaporeans working in blue-collar jobs like food deliverers, security guards, private hire vehicle drivers, and more.


Share this:
 
where the fuck is cheebye loong? hidding behind ho ching skirt is it? he is the one who approves all these shitskins coming in

this minions ministers not fit to talk about cecas, they are just porlumpars
 
Come off it Tannie.

This CECA started in 2003 after the dotcom crash.

What happened at this time was clearly Microsoft arshole screwed up their Window 2000, Windows Me software full of shits that failed miserably.

MS hired 3,000 ahneh developers which screwed up their MS Windows 2000 and ME.

From there onwards India syndicated groups steal MS administration jobs all over the world. That MSCSE, Microsoft Certificate System Engineer jobs were stolen by Indian ahneh world wide.

This are the fact history written in stone.

What happened at the same time was baby boomers investing in investment properties. This was made possible of banking property loan break up where baby boomers were encourage to buy residential investment properties to take care of their retirement, passive income.

Heard of LOC and LVR, borrowing capacity?

With these 2 happening the worldwide economy boomed for next 20 years till now.

Residential properties need tenants, plenty of tenants, and where to find millions of locals to rent millions of investment property units built.

The only source for tenants must come from overseas foreigners and CECA was drafted to allow free flow of fake degrees ahnehs to come work in Singapore to take up tenants position for the rent seeking economy.

What fuck is this FT create jobs.. fuck you and yr PAP...

FT creates tenant occupants for the rent seeking economy. That's about it....

Furthermore, after the dotcom crash, new coding JavaScript was invented with html5 and the internet economy boom boom boom. That where India fake degree surged to steal and grab these jobs,

and your PAP let fake degrees ahneh in on the learn as u earn program to take up these valued PMET jobs and take up tenancy occupants of the residential investment property, boom boom boom.

There are books written of what happen after dotcom crash and the baby boomers urge in investing residential properties, boom economy. Go read them.

What's that FTs create jobs for Singapore, fuck you John. Yes, FTs created gate guards more taxi drivers, cleaners for Singaporeans to serve these cheats, theives fake degree ahnehs, from zero to heroes to Superstar IT, nursing and bankers workers as tenants of condo type investment properties...... all at the expense of the rent seeking economy....

You and PAP Loong can go fuck yrslf...

The facts speak for itself. Many CECA talents are in Singapore to create their startups here, not in India. We should be glad that the CECA talents are fighting for Singapore by setting up their enterprises here. India would be much stronger today if these talents had chosen to remain in India.
 
You agree with Ong Y Kung that Singaporeans should open our legs for prostitution in order to bring in more pimps to invest in Singapore future?

I agree with Minister Ong that PSP lied and misled Singaporeans. There has not been a free pass for Indian workers to enter Singapore unconditionally for work or immigration.
 
I agree with Minister Ong that PSP lied and misled Singaporeans. There has not been a free pass for Indian workers to enter Singapore unconditionally for work or immigration.
How to explain the crowds of black skin in Chenai Business Park and Mumbai Financial Center in Singapore?
 
How to explain the crowds of black skin in Chenai Business Park and Mumbai Financial Center in Singapore?

Minister Tan explained it very well. The increase in number of brahmin PMETs is due to the digital growth and chink programmers staying put in China to work in their own domestic digital unicorns.
 
Minister Tan explained it very well. The increase in number of brahmin PMETs is due to the digital growth
Brahmin are here to prey on Singaporean Chinese Mei Mei, you better keep your children under lock and key otherwise you will end up like the NY polytechnic lecturer making a scene in Orchard.
 
The facts speak for itself. Many CECA talents are in Singapore to create their startups here, not in India. We should be glad that the CECA talents are fighting for Singapore by setting up their enterprises here. India would be much stronger today if these talents had chosen to remain in India.
TH takes in all sorts of startup, nothing interesting and if can get 30% PAP happy. I tried TH start up before.

This startup is a gamble of chance. India don't have the money like TH to throw and as such pass.
 
Even the ang mors know that open door policy for foreign labour drives down wages and benefit the oligarchs..what more the SHITCA to the the singkie working class?

Wage dynamics in Australia have been permanently changed by foreign labour​

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens
Posted 18h ago18 hours ago, updated 15h ago15 hours ago
a man at a podium

Reserve Bank Governor Philip Lowe says in some industries, wages are less likely to increase. (
ABC News: John Gunn
)
Share
Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe says the ability of Australia's employers to "tap" global labour markets for foreign workers may have permanently changed wage dynamics in Australia.

Key points:​

  • The last time wages growth in Australia was above 3 per cent was a decade ago
  • RBA governor Philip Lowe says wage dynamics have been permanently altered by foreign labour
  • It could take many years before wage growth hits 3 per cent again
He also says if interest rates remain low for years, government spending will have to play a bigger role in the next downturn, because conventional monetary policy will be a diminished force.
Speaking to the Economic Society of Australia on Thursday, Dr Lowe said with Australia's labour market becoming more "flexible" in recent decades, employers had found it easier to import workers from overseas.
He said that partly explained why wages were less likely to increase when there was an increase in demand for labour.
He said the ability to hire foreign workers to overcome bottlenecks and to fill specific gaps where workers were in short supply had helped businesses to operate effectively, and that was a good thing.
"This benefit was clearly evident during the resources boom, and there are a wide range of businesses in industries that have benefited from hiring foreign workers," he said.
"Without this ability, output in Australia would have been lower."
However, he said the ability to source workers from overseas "dilutes" upward pressure on wages in some parts of the economy and it was possible there were "spillovers" from that phenomenon to the rest of the labour market.
"This hiring can [also] dilute the incentive for businesses to train workers to do the required job," Dr Lowe said.

Do not conflate immigration with foreign workers​

Dr Lowe said it was important to distinguish between the role that foreign workers were playing in local labour markets and the impact immigration was having on the economy more broadly.
He said immigration added to both the supply of, and demand for, labour in the economy, and the precise balance between their extra labour supply and extra labour demand was difficult to determine and depended on specific circumstances.
He said the picture was clearer, however, when it came to firms sourcing labour from overseas to perform specific roles in Australia.
He said at the time of the 2016 census there were roughly 430,000 people working in Australia on temporary visas, and some industries relied more heavily on those workers than others.
Temporary migrant employment

In the food trades, workers on temporary visas filled around 18 per cent of jobs, while in the hospitality sector they filled around 13 per cent of jobs.
He said most of those workers were either on temporary visas for skilled workers or were student visas.
In contrast, in the farm sector, it was more common for workers to be on working holiday visas.
A woman holding a suitcase on wheels walks away from the camera.

Without half a million short-term migrant workers and thousands more longer term arrivals, employers are finding it harder, and possibly more expensive, to fill some roles.(
Pexels: Alexandr Podvalny
)
Dr Lowe said if you thought about it conceptually, the ability that employers had to "tap into the global labour market" for workers that were in short supply was "flattening the supply curve" for those kinds of workers.
"A flat supply curve means that a shift in demand has only a small effect on prices, or in this case, wages," Dr Lowe said.
"In my view, this is one of the factors that has contributed to wages being less sensitive to shifts in demand than was once the case."
This is a topic the RBA (and other economists) have been talking about more in recent months.
With Australia's international borders closed, a large experiment is being run with the labour market.

The secret to Australia's jobs performance?​

A woman walks away from newspaper jobs in a rubbish bin
ABS figures are hiding 300,000 job losses that helped to push down Australia's unemployment rate after the borders were closed.
Read more
Hundreds of thousands of foreign workers have left Australia in the last 18 months and businesses are complaining about labour shortages — even though the national unemployment rate is still 5.1 per cent and the underemployment rate is 7.4 per cent.
Dr Lowe said there were small pockets of wage growth in some sectors of the economy at the moment but employers generally were still reluctant to lift wages to attract workers.
He said many were holding out for borders to reopen.
After the RBA's board meeting on Tuesday, Dr Lowe said borders would probably have to stay closed for another 18 months to two years before wage dynamics became "quite different".
And he is working under the assumption that borders will gradually be reopened over the next year, "particularly for workers who have skills that are in short supply".
So he's assuming employers will get their wish and there won't be any broad-based wage increases brought on by our borders remaining shut.
For that reason, he said it will probably take a few years before wage pressures build to the point where inflation is sitting comfortably within the 2 to 3 per cent band, and that's why he'll be keeping interest rates at exceptionally low levels for the next few years.

How long will it take for wages to pick up?​

He had sobering news on that point.
He said the last time wages growth in Australia was above 3 per cent was "a decade ago," and in that time the rate of growth had ground down slowly to 1.5 per cent.
He said there were "powerful" structural factors at work, including the psychological factor of employers still being obsessed with cost-cutting.

Australia’s reservoir of workers running low​

a man at a podium
The RBA governor says when borders reopen it will remove some wage pressures from Australia's economy, because employers will be able to import skilled labour again, writes Gareth Hutchens.
Read more
"I don't see those factors going away quickly," he said.
"They were there for a decade. They're fundamental. They're global.
"And because we don't see them turning around quickly, the grind higher in wages will be slow and if wages growth is still running with a 2 in front of it [in coming years] it's going to be very difficult for us to deliver an inflation rate [of] around 2.5 per cent.
"That process is going to take time to work through," he said.

Government spending will need to be bigger in future downturns​

On another topic, Dr Lowe said he would really like to see the economy improve to the point where inflation was sitting in the 2 to 3 per cent band, and interest rates returned to more normal levels.
However, he said there was a possibility interest rates would not lift much from their currently exceptionally low levels by the time the next downturn occurred.
He said in such a scenario, government spending (ie fiscal policy) would have to play a larger role in supporting the economy than it did this time because monetary policy would have relatively little ammunition.
"I know Treasury are thinking about the mechanisms and approaches to make that effective because we all know there are challenges here in using fiscal policy in a counter-cyclical sense," he said.
He said it was probable the RBA would have to keep purchasing Australian government bonds in future downturns too — a phenomenon once considered extraordinary — given how much global economic dynamics had changed in recent years.
"Quantitative easing will have an ongoing role but I think it'd be unwise to rely on that as the main instrument of macro-economic management," he said.
Posted 18h ago18 hours ago, updated 15h ago
 
Even the ang mors know that open door policy for foreign labour drives down wages and benefit the oligarchs..what more the SHITCA to the the singkie working class?

Wage dynamics in Australia have been permanently changed by foreign labour​

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens
Posted 18h ago18 hours ago, updated 15h ago15 hours ago
a man at a podium

Reserve Bank Governor Philip Lowe says in some industries, wages are less likely to increase. (
ABC News: John Gunn
)
Share
Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe says the ability of Australia's employers to "tap" global labour markets for foreign workers may have permanently changed wage dynamics in Australia.

Key points:​

  • The last time wages growth in Australia was above 3 per cent was a decade ago
  • RBA governor Philip Lowe says wage dynamics have been permanently altered by foreign labour
  • It could take many years before wage growth hits 3 per cent again
He also says if interest rates remain low for years, government spending will have to play a bigger role in the next downturn, because conventional monetary policy will be a diminished force.
Speaking to the Economic Society of Australia on Thursday, Dr Lowe said with Australia's labour market becoming more "flexible" in recent decades, employers had found it easier to import workers from overseas.
He said that partly explained why wages were less likely to increase when there was an increase in demand for labour.
He said the ability to hire foreign workers to overcome bottlenecks and to fill specific gaps where workers were in short supply had helped businesses to operate effectively, and that was a good thing.
"This benefit was clearly evident during the resources boom, and there are a wide range of businesses in industries that have benefited from hiring foreign workers," he said.

However, he said the ability to source workers from overseas "dilutes" upward pressure on wages in some parts of the economy and it was possible there were "spillovers" from that phenomenon to the rest of the labour market.
"This hiring can [also] dilute the incentive for businesses to train workers to do the required job," Dr Lowe said.

Do not conflate immigration with foreign workers​

Dr Lowe said it was important to distinguish between the role that foreign workers were playing in local labour markets and the impact immigration was having on the economy more broadly.
He said immigration added to both the supply of, and demand for, labour in the economy, and the precise balance between their extra labour supply and extra labour demand was difficult to determine and depended on specific circumstances.
He said the picture was clearer, however, when it came to firms sourcing labour from overseas to perform specific roles in Australia.
He said at the time of the 2016 census there were roughly 430,000 people working in Australia on temporary visas, and some industries relied more heavily on those workers than others.
Temporary migrant employment

In the food trades, workers on temporary visas filled around 18 per cent of jobs, while in the hospitality sector they filled around 13 per cent of jobs.
He said most of those workers were either on temporary visas for skilled workers or were student visas.
In contrast, in the farm sector, it was more common for workers to be on working holiday visas.
A woman holding a suitcase on wheels walks away from the camera.

Without half a million short-term migrant workers and thousands more longer term arrivals, employers are finding it harder, and possibly more expensive, to fill some roles.(
Pexels: Alexandr Podvalny
)
Dr Lowe said if you thought about it conceptually, the ability that employers had to "tap into the global labour market" for workers that were in short supply was "flattening the supply curve" for those kinds of workers.
"A flat supply curve means that a shift in demand has only a small effect on prices, or in this case, wages," Dr Lowe said.

This is a topic the RBA (and other economists) have been talking about more in recent months.
With Australia's international borders closed, a large experiment is being run with the labour market.

The secret to Australia's jobs performance?

A woman walks away from newspaper jobs in a rubbish bin
ABS figures are hiding 300,000 job losses that helped to push down Australia's unemployment rate after the borders were closed.
Read more
Hundreds of thousands of foreign workers have left Australia in the last 18 months and businesses are complaining about labour shortages — even though the national unemployment rate is still 5.1 per cent and the underemployment rate is 7.4 per cent.
Dr Lowe said there were small pockets of wage growth in some sectors of the economy at the moment but employers generally were still reluctant to lift wages to attract workers.
He said many were holding out for borders to reopen.
After the RBA's board meeting on Tuesday, Dr Lowe said borders would probably have to stay closed for another 18 months to two years before wage dynamics became "quite different".
And he is working under the assumption that borders will gradually be reopened over the next year, "particularly for workers who have skills that are in short supply".
So he's assuming employers will get their wish and there won't be any broad-based wage increases brought on by our borders remaining shut.
For that reason, he said it will probably take a few years before wage pressures build to the point where inflation is sitting comfortably within the 2 to 3 per cent band, and that's why he'll be keeping interest rates at exceptionally low levels for the next few years.

How long will it take for wages to pick up?​

He had sobering news on that point.
He said the last time wages growth in Australia was above 3 per cent was "a decade ago," and in that time the rate of growth had ground down slowly to 1.5 per cent.
He said there were "powerful" structural factors at work, including the psychological factor of employers still being obsessed with cost-cutting.

Australia’s reservoir of workers running low

a man at a podium
The RBA governor says when borders reopen it will remove some wage pressures from Australia's economy, because employers will be able to import skilled labour again, writes Gareth Hutchens.
Read more
"I don't see those factors going away quickly," he said.
"They were there for a decade. They're fundamental. They're global.
"And because we don't see them turning around quickly, the grind higher in wages will be slow and if wages growth is still running with a 2 in front of it [in coming years] it's going to be very difficult for us to deliver an inflation rate [of] around 2.5 per cent.
"That process is going to take time to work through," he said.

Government spending will need to be bigger in future downturns​

On another topic, Dr Lowe said he would really like to see the economy improve to the point where inflation was sitting in the 2 to 3 per cent band, and interest rates returned to more normal levels.
However, he said there was a possibility interest rates would not lift much from their currently exceptionally low levels by the time the next downturn occurred.
He said in such a scenario, government spending (ie fiscal policy) would have to play a larger role in supporting the economy than it did this time because monetary policy would have relatively little ammunition.
"I know Treasury are thinking about the mechanisms and approaches to make that effective because we all know there are challenges here in using fiscal policy in a counter-cyclical sense," he said.
He said it was probable the RBA would have to keep purchasing Australian government bonds in future downturns too — a phenomenon once considered extraordinary — given how much global economic dynamics had changed in recent years.
"Quantitative easing will have an ongoing role but I think it'd be unwise to rely on that as the main instrument of macro-economic management," he said.
Posted 18h ago18 hours ago, updated 15h ago

If Australia signed CECA, they would be able to tap into one of the world's fastest and most dynamic economies, just like Singapore did nearly 20 years ago. Thanks to CECA, Singapore has leapfrogged the region. Look at the number of ASEAN serfs flocking to work in Singapore.
 
where the fuck is cheebye loong? hidding behind ho ching skirt is it? he is the one who approves all these shitskins coming in

this minions ministers not fit to talk about cecas, they are just porlumpars
He's busy counting the gold bars at his underground bunker.:tongue:
 
Brahmin are here to prey on Singaporean Chinese Mei Mei, you better keep your children under lock and key otherwise you will end up like the NY polytechnic lecturer making a scene in Orchard.
John will have a heart attack when he saw his daughter with an Ah Neh at Orchard.
 
If Australia signed CECA, they would be able to tap into one of the world's fastest and most dynamic economies, just like Singapore did nearly 20 years ago. Thanks to CECA, Singapore has leapfrogged the region. Look at the number of ASEAN serfs flocking to work in Singapore.
Pls quantify why u say.. u mean the standard of living has increased? N cost of living has dropping?
 
Even the ang mors know that open door policy for foreign labour drives down wages and benefit the oligarchs..what more the SHITCA to the the singkie working class?

Wage dynamics in Australia have been permanently changed by foreign labour​

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens
Posted 18h ago18 hours ago, updated 15h ago15 hours ago
a man at a podium

Reserve Bank Governor Philip Lowe says in some industries, wages are less likely to increase. (
ABC News: John Gunn
)
Share
Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe says the ability of Australia's employers to "tap" global labour markets for foreign workers may have permanently changed wage dynamics in Australia.

Key points:​

  • The last time wages growth in Australia was above 3 per cent was a decade ago
  • RBA governor Philip Lowe says wage dynamics have been permanently altered by foreign labour
  • It could take many years before wage growth hits 3 per cent again
He also says if interest rates remain low for years, government spending will have to play a bigger role in the next downturn, because conventional monetary policy will be a diminished force.
Speaking to the Economic Society of Australia on Thursday, Dr Lowe said with Australia's labour market becoming more "flexible" in recent decades, employers had found it easier to import workers from overseas.
He said that partly explained why wages were less likely to increase when there was an increase in demand for labour.
He said the ability to hire foreign workers to overcome bottlenecks and to fill specific gaps where workers were in short supply had helped businesses to operate effectively, and that was a good thing.
"This benefit was clearly evident during the resources boom, and there are a wide range of businesses in industries that have benefited from hiring foreign workers," he said.

However, he said the ability to source workers from overseas "dilutes" upward pressure on wages in some parts of the economy and it was possible there were "spillovers" from that phenomenon to the rest of the labour market.
"This hiring can [also] dilute the incentive for businesses to train workers to do the required job," Dr Lowe said.

Do not conflate immigration with foreign workers​

Dr Lowe said it was important to distinguish between the role that foreign workers were playing in local labour markets and the impact immigration was having on the economy more broadly.
He said immigration added to both the supply of, and demand for, labour in the economy, and the precise balance between their extra labour supply and extra labour demand was difficult to determine and depended on specific circumstances.
He said the picture was clearer, however, when it came to firms sourcing labour from overseas to perform specific roles in Australia.
He said at the time of the 2016 census there were roughly 430,000 people working in Australia on temporary visas, and some industries relied more heavily on those workers than others.
Temporary migrant employment

In the food trades, workers on temporary visas filled around 18 per cent of jobs, while in the hospitality sector they filled around 13 per cent of jobs.
He said most of those workers were either on temporary visas for skilled workers or were student visas.
In contrast, in the farm sector, it was more common for workers to be on working holiday visas.
A woman holding a suitcase on wheels walks away from the camera.

Without half a million short-term migrant workers and thousands more longer term arrivals, employers are finding it harder, and possibly more expensive, to fill some roles.(
Pexels: Alexandr Podvalny
)
Dr Lowe said if you thought about it conceptually, the ability that employers had to "tap into the global labour market" for workers that were in short supply was "flattening the supply curve" for those kinds of workers.
"A flat supply curve means that a shift in demand has only a small effect on prices, or in this case, wages," Dr Lowe said.

This is a topic the RBA (and other economists) have been talking about more in recent months.
With Australia's international borders closed, a large experiment is being run with the labour market.

The secret to Australia's jobs performance?

A woman walks away from newspaper jobs in a rubbish bin
ABS figures are hiding 300,000 job losses that helped to push down Australia's unemployment rate after the borders were closed.
Read more
Hundreds of thousands of foreign workers have left Australia in the last 18 months and businesses are complaining about labour shortages — even though the national unemployment rate is still 5.1 per cent and the underemployment rate is 7.4 per cent.
Dr Lowe said there were small pockets of wage growth in some sectors of the economy at the moment but employers generally were still reluctant to lift wages to attract workers.
He said many were holding out for borders to reopen.
After the RBA's board meeting on Tuesday, Dr Lowe said borders would probably have to stay closed for another 18 months to two years before wage dynamics became "quite different".
And he is working under the assumption that borders will gradually be reopened over the next year, "particularly for workers who have skills that are in short supply".
So he's assuming employers will get their wish and there won't be any broad-based wage increases brought on by our borders remaining shut.
For that reason, he said it will probably take a few years before wage pressures build to the point where inflation is sitting comfortably within the 2 to 3 per cent band, and that's why he'll be keeping interest rates at exceptionally low levels for the next few years.

How long will it take for wages to pick up?​

He had sobering news on that point.
He said the last time wages growth in Australia was above 3 per cent was "a decade ago," and in that time the rate of growth had ground down slowly to 1.5 per cent.
He said there were "powerful" structural factors at work, including the psychological factor of employers still being obsessed with cost-cutting.

Australia’s reservoir of workers running low

a man at a podium
The RBA governor says when borders reopen it will remove some wage pressures from Australia's economy, because employers will be able to import skilled labour again, writes Gareth Hutchens.
Read more
"I don't see those factors going away quickly," he said.
"They were there for a decade. They're fundamental. They're global.
"And because we don't see them turning around quickly, the grind higher in wages will be slow and if wages growth is still running with a 2 in front of it [in coming years] it's going to be very difficult for us to deliver an inflation rate [of] around 2.5 per cent.
"That process is going to take time to work through," he said.

Government spending will need to be bigger in future downturns​

On another topic, Dr Lowe said he would really like to see the economy improve to the point where inflation was sitting in the 2 to 3 per cent band, and interest rates returned to more normal levels.
However, he said there was a possibility interest rates would not lift much from their currently exceptionally low levels by the time the next downturn occurred.
He said in such a scenario, government spending (ie fiscal policy) would have to play a larger role in supporting the economy than it did this time because monetary policy would have relatively little ammunition.
"I know Treasury are thinking about the mechanisms and approaches to make that effective because we all know there are challenges here in using fiscal policy in a counter-cyclical sense," he said.
He said it was probable the RBA would have to keep purchasing Australian government bonds in future downturns too — a phenomenon once considered extraordinary — given how much global economic dynamics had changed in recent years.
"Quantitative easing will have an ongoing role but I think it'd be unwise to rely on that as the main instrument of macro-economic management," he said.
Posted 18h ago18 hours ago, updated 15h ago
Why does this man make such precise and relevant observations to their labour market? Is he a scholar? An administrative elite with pay scale matching multinational corporations? I can not understand how Australia can retain such talents in the public sector! :eek:
 
Pls quantify why u say.. u mean the standard of living has increased? N cost of living has dropping?

Singapore's median income has increased yearly for the past 20 years, and it's been almost 20 years since CECA was signed.

SINGAPORE — The median monthly income from work for households in Singapore rose from S$5,600 in 2010 to S$7,744 in 2020, which is a 1.9 per cent increase yearly after adjusting for inflation — a rate slightly higher than the previous decade.

Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/median-household-income-rose-shrinking-family-sizes-singstat
 
Singapore's median income has increased yearly for the past 20 years, and it's been almost 20 years since CECA was signed.

SINGAPORE — The median monthly income from work for households in Singapore rose from S$5,600 in 2010 to S$7,744 in 2020, which is a 1.9 per cent increase yearly after adjusting for inflation — a rate slightly higher than the previous decade.

Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/median-household-income-rose-shrinking-family-sizes-singstat
The rich got richer which makes the median look better. What is the percentage of singkies who earn that amount? N is it family income? Or individual income? Wat is the percentage of singkies who b earn tat amount?
 
Back
Top