Hongkie paper slams Singapore: Singaporeans actually not that rich, only FT's are.

[greenies]

Re: Hongkie paper slams Singapore: Singaporeans actually not that rich, only FT's are

Whatever you say, the majority of the world and business leaders know that HK is better than S'pore.
China was smart not making HK to loose out the competitiveness when HK handed over in 1997.

 

[wMulew]

Re: Hongkie paper slams Singapore: Singaporeans actually not that rich, only FT's are

Whatever you say, the majority of the world and business leaders know that HK is better than S'pore.
China was smart not making HK to loose out the competitiveness when HK handed over in 1997.

Dumbfuck opposition supporting retard. Hong Kong economy have been stagnant for the last 10 years. Most of what they originally do, Shanghai is slowly taking over. Even their all important Financial Centre status is being debated in China. SG on the otherhand is not impacted as badly as Hong Kong as we deal primarily with the Southeast Asia region. Only frog in the well dumbfuck opposition supporting retard will think otherwise

Here's are some comments from Hongkie rich man Li Ka Shing
http://ipezone.blogspot.in/2013/09/li-ka-shing-when-shanghai-overtakes.html

 

[greenies]

Re: Hongkie paper slams Singapore: Singaporeans actually not that rich, only FT's are

Dumbfuck opposition supporting retard. Hong Kong economy have been stagnant for the last 10 years. Most of what they originally do, Shanghai is slowly taking over. Even their all important Financial Centre status is being debated in China. SG on the otherhand is not impacted as badly as Hong Kong as we deal primarily with the Southeast Asia region. Only frog in the well dumbfuck opposition supporting retard will think otherwise

Here's are some comments from Hongkie rich man Li Ka Shing
http://ipezone.blogspot.in/2013/09/li-ka-shing-when-shanghai-overtakes.html

You see even though 10-years stagnant in economy in HK and sharp increase in GDP in S'pore (by risking Singaporean living style, culture and unity) in the past 8 years, HK is still doing well above S'pore.

Who are better deliverers?
HK quasi-communist linked government or S'pore PAP?

 

[wMulew]

Re: Hongkie paper slams Singapore: Singaporeans actually not that rich, only FT's are

You see even though 10-years stagnant in economy in HK and sharp increase in GDP in S'pore (by risking Singaporean living style, culture and unity) in the past 8 years, HK is still doing well above S'pore.

Who are better deliverers?
HK quasi-communist linked government or S'pore PAP?

Your definition of doing well is certainly out of touch with reality let me remind U again

In terms of income SG is higher

In terms of cost of living I've already shown SG is better if not at least equal

In terms of property prices HK is higher

In terms of FT, Hong Kongs have just as many from China

In terms of density, although Hong Kong on paper is less dense than SG, fact is Hong Kong is mostly made up of mountainous area and they have to build their house closer and taller than SG making it worse than ours

In terms of Environment, we have haze a few weeks a year. The air pollution in Hong Kong is bad all year round due to factories from Shenzhen

Every single thing U complain about SG, Hong Kong has it worse.

There is almost no single indicator that would concern U that tells anyone Hong Kong is doing any better than SG

 

[Leongsam]

Re: Hongkie paper slams Singapore: Singaporeans actually not that rich, only FT's are

(by risking Singaporean living style, culture and unity)

Every single time I ask exactly what Singapore culture is, nobody gives me a direct answer. The reason is simple. There is no such thing as Singapore culture so there is nothing to risk.

The Singapore culture has always been nothing more than "rojak" and the more ingredients you add, the better the "rojak" gets.