- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,888
- Points
- 0
Diabetes is also western disease come with eating western food!
The problem with our medical community here in Singapore is that they are brought with a notion that anything that is not within their scientific community is a quake.
And it's graduates are recognized as medical doctors in some countries.In fact,if I am not mistaken in UK,one has to have an MBBS as a basic degree tp study and practice Homeopathy.
Now apart from TCM,the Indian schools such as Ayurveda and Siddha are also now widely accepted in western circle.
I say already, if you are interested to know, go and search it yourself. I do not spoon feed sinkie. You dun believe what i say , then dun read it. simple as that. why would i wanna quote to you and why should i listen to you .
Quote to a sinkie to read? i will never do that.
i already give you some infor that the one who research on the effectiveness of laetrile is by an honest researcher in the USA. he is well known. The politcs in USA to cover this B17 cure to cancer is huge but still people are able to have faith in it.
I have never thought of shutting anyone up as i don't give a shit what you and others are saying. I just want to see how stupid you are with your NUS backing. And it has prove to me that you are a complete sinkie fool and a trash from NUS and a serf to the politics that govern educational and medical institutions..... and i am right again.
Sinkie do not care about others, they only care about their own status and what position they are in.
So are you for or against mainstream acceptance? Or is it the scientific method of empiricism that you're skeptical about? You don't care about scientific proof as long as there are university degrees and government approval to validate treatments?
Alternative medicine is complementary .It requires more funding to be researched for scientific method of empiricism...thereby it's not a question of whether this or that.It's both.One cannot discount alternative medicine which has a history of thousands of years.
Not so much in lab
The point being,many countries recognizes the importance of alternative medicine.
So until it's proven by science, we should just accept its claims as valid because of tradition and history? By all means, enjoy tradition and history. But don't make epistemic claims by appealing to history. It's one thing admiring a Qing vase; it's another to claim that the dragons on it are real by virtue of its thousand-year history.
You sound as if homeopathy and TCM are banned in Singapore. Anyway, not everyone in all those countries recognise the importance of unproven alternative medicine. The video clips that I posted depicted clearly the disdain some in those countries have towards homeopathy. Where are the Sinkie versions of these videos? All I'm getting here are Sinkies being copycats and simply regurgitating what they read on dubious websites without thinking out of the box and questioning what they read.
So until it's proven by science, we should just accept its claims as valid because of tradition and history? By all means, enjoy tradition and history. But don't make epistemic claims by appealing to history. It's one thing admiring a Qing vase; it's another to claim that the dragons on it are real by virtue of its thousand-year history.
Empiricism isn't restricted to labs. The argument here is that there's no empirical proof for all these alternative medicine, be it in labs or war zones.
You sound as if homeopathy and TCM are banned in Singapore. Anyway, not everyone in all those countries recognise the importance of unproven alternative medicine. The video clips that I posted depicted clearly the disdain some in those countries have towards homeopathy. Where are the Sinkie versions of these videos? All I'm getting here are Sinkies being copycats and simply regurgitating what they read on dubious websites without thinking out of the box and questioning what they read.
No body forces you to accept anything as a fact or otherwise;it's your prerogative....The question I put to you is why do you force your belief system on others?.
Besides,can you prove to us your belief system is an exact science;that what is proven today is not proven otherwise tomorrow?....can you guarantee that.
You make me laugh.By your contradictions.Your video clips are not reflective of everyone lah.Hey,it is you who says there are many dubious websites --your words and not mine.But doing exactly the same by quoting some of it.:p:(
You are simply dwelling in selective argument.