You are missing the point. SPH controls the main stream media. Its first and foremost duty is to the country and its people. Journalism like medicine, law and many aspects of public service is an essential and noble endeavour.
Unfortunately it is used as an instrument of the PAP for its own purposes. It has a poor and sad track record. Journalism in Singapore is thus considered thrash in Singapore.
You are also mistaken that opposition websites does provide alternative views. There is no comparison between the two. Its akin to suggest that Robinsons and the small store in the HDB void deck are similar.
If the PAP is truly that good, it would have made SPH independent and introduced competition. It can't and it never will. Its no different to the Admin banning you because your views are different from others. That's no fair or is it?
Would suggest that you find logic behind a position before assuming that everything PAP says is right. Its not religion where faith is involved. We can only make it better country if we can see the flaws in ourselves. It took the old man 22 years to realise that no all people are linguistically inclined. A mistake that caused some in a generation dearly.
Here is little but true story and it involves the former Perm Sec and old man's brother in law. He has 2 sons. The first son struggled thru Chinese and seeing the strain his boy, Kwa Soon Been appraoched his sister and suggested the he send his son overseas for his education. The sister persuaded him otherwise as it would be a slap to the face of her husband. He agreed. When his second son struggled and mind you with tuition, he told his sister, its his son's future and sent him overseas. He was so upset with the policy and the damage that it did to those with less linguistic skills, he committed this episode to the Oral History Archive. He was convinced its was a mistake as he saw his sons flourish overseas and became a success. It took Ho Ching - another in law to convince the old man that he was mistaken and forced her stepson's enrollment in Singapore American School. How many Singaporeans can afford sending their kids overseas. By the way, the policy was breached by allowing the grandson to go to American School.
I am telling you this as SPH for 22 years did not provide alternative views or provide contrarian or indepedent thought to this policy. This is one of many examples where the fourth estate failed. This is despite the fact that many Singaporeans had expressed the burden of one subject causing mayhem.
Questions of the oppositions' proactiveness in reflecting singaporeans' needs can be answered objectively by reference to the oppositions' own websites.
There is no need to cross-ref to the 154th and get yourself tied up in ceaseless and useless debates.