Obviously he was insinuating insults on me which you agreed meaning I was just insulting him back and yet you can blatantly tell lies I started it first.
Please quote that post of mine in which I said
I agreed with you that he was "insinuating insults" on you
before you insulted him back.
Once again, the following were my exact words:
sammyboy.com/posts/2716572
But Cottonmouth started saying that only
after the following post of yours, which was
your very first reply in any of his threads, replying to
Wunderfool almost exactly
one and a half years ago, and only
less than one month after Cottonmouth joined the forum:
30-10-2016, 06:45 PM
sammyboy.com/threads/typical-sinkie-bitch-who-thinks-only-shes-right.237095/#post-2530226
I pity her husband for marrying a fucking cunt like her.
What a fucking ugly bitch.
Is this Ginfreely ?
No. This woman dumped cottonmouth and that's why this evil and narrow hearted mudlander psychopath is revenging on her now. What a low blow as usual from mudlander psychopath cottonmouth (previous nick SINKIE).
sammyboy.com/posts/2717164
If you had
not insulted
him first, and
if he ended up
insulting (NOT "insinuating") you first at any point in time
after he joined in
early October 2016, then I would
agree with you that
he (and not you) was the one who
started the quarrel.
so
how am
I agreeing with you that he was "insinuating insults" on you?
o_O
If you're referring to his insults
after 30 October 2016, which were actually
direct insults and not just "insinuating" you, and if you're using those examples to
claim that he started the quarrel, then I'm afraid you're simply trying to
cover up the
fact that
you were
truly the one who "drew first blood", in order to play the "victim". :(
The
only way
you can win this argument is if you can manage to find a post of his
before that post of yours (on "30-10-2016, 06:45 PM") in which he
clearly mentions "ginfreely" or in which he
quotes your post to
reply to; and obviously, if you do manage to find it, please post it in this thread, otherwise
you would also be
guilty of "hot air", right?