The majority of those of us who post here are male. As such, the voice of the girls are largely absent from this forum.
AWARE, the supposed gaurdian of female issues, has so far been silent on this issue. Given the recent unwanted publicity, I suppose they want to lie low and not get embroiled in another messy affair (pun intended).
The following is a blog posting I found. If you look at her blog from 2008 to 2010, you will find that she is largely apolitical. Until the Jack Neo incident, she has
NEVER made a political posting.
The Jack Neo incident and the involvement of Minister George Yeo seems to have unleashed an incredible fury. In the short spate of 4 days, she unleashed 4 posting, all crtical of Mr Yeo and the "support" he provided for Jack Neo.
She looks at things from the position of a mother who has a young daughter to protect. She fears that we are sending the signal that it is "ok" for rich and powerful older men to abuse their position to solicit for sex. When she was young, she must have been quite "chio". In an earlier posting, she recounts her experiences of how older men tried to proposition her when she was 20.
It is a very refreshing read. I especially like the blog posting about MM Lee. Given MM Lee's strong moral stance, she is aghast that Mr Yeo appears to be squandering his legacy.
I have extracted and posted the latest blog entry. For those interested in the other postings, please check out her blog
http://petunialee.blogspot.com/2010/03/dont-vote-for-george-yeo.html
---
Don't Vote for George Yeo
The thing about gender relations is that there is an equilibrium to be managed. In cultures where the burden of chastity sits squarely on the shoulders of the woman, women have to go through extraordinary lengths to stay safe. They have to cover hair, eyes and body. They cannot go to many places because by simply being in a certain place, men can say "You hit on me, just by being there." Perhaps, smiling at a man could be perceived as a come on?
I wear shorts and half-backed t-shirts. But I am not hitting on any of the men who see me walk down the street. I like that freedom. When a man holds the door open for me, I smile at him. I am not hitting on him. My hair is long and chestnut brown. That is also not a hit on any man who sees it.
Men need to play their part, and share in the burden of protecting women's safety, by controlling themselves, and by counselling other men to good behavior.
For women to move freely without constraint in public... for women to feel safe at work from lecherous bosses... for teens to develop a healthy sexuality uncontaminated by the sex education men like Jack are more than pleased to offer... George Yeo should come out and state that Jack's actions are unacceptable (of course, I can think of stronger words than "unacceptable" but let's be gentle shall we?)
If George Yeo fails to state unequivocally that Jack's actions were wrong, then he has let down Jack's wife and every other wronged wife in Singapore. He has let down Maelle, and all other teens who've been hit on my lechers. He has let down Foyce, and all other women who have lecherous bosses. Men all over Singapore will know that this is a country where men can cheat a wife and a mistress, hit on teens and grope their female subordinates... and be told "You poor thing. You are going through an ordeal".
George Yeo owes the women of Singapore an unequivocal statement that Jack's actions were wrong. Women are ill represented by George. Let us not vote for him.
Grandfathers with grand-daughters. Fathers with daughters. Husbands with wives who work outside the home. If you love your women and care about their safety and their right to move freely about Singapore, don't vote for George Yeo either. He will craft a Singapore where women cannot feel safe.
George Yeo's open call to support Jack Neo through his ordeal paired with his silence on Jack's misdeeds may be conveniently interpreted by many males that (1) every wife should forgive, and (2) every mistress is to be blamed for the man's affair, and (3) every female teen is up for grabs.
Let us not have him represent us.