• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Forummer Char Azn - Couple of Pointers

And U find it so hard to ignore just like U did the 90% of the other posts because?

Quite frankly most of my earlier post were all on the same level that SIFU post, only without the swearing :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Whether I can follow the line of reasoning depends very much on how the the other party replies. The reason why I break down all my answers is precisely to avoid getting the thing too convoluted and messed up in the end. Of coz it is hard to argue with anyone who pulls facts from their ass and still seem logical and to the point :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

ooi...

this thread is about u.. i dun want to get drag in...:p

the honor is all yours..:D
 
Char_Azn said:
I felt its wrong and unfair to condemn New Citizens and more so to condemn their kids, many of whom were actually born here. How was that no basis or insignificant when given the fact that I have proven in many of my post with official stats and articles that our population is made up of a significant number of new citizens all the way back from the 70s when our population growth was basically totally backed by "new citizens".

yuelao said:
Just to point out one of your stupid assumptions. You seem to think that people are furious with new citizens. If you have half the brains you claim you have, you would have realised that the mood of most in the forum are not against new citizens or their kids. And you dare to post some long essay to back your baseless assumption which gives people a headache just to read through. People are angry that lowly qualified people can easily come in and become PRs. Whether they become citizens later on is merely a side issue.

Char_Azn said:
I thought my answer to your question was pretty short

Guess the saying about not arguing with dum-dums is right. The stupid do not know they are stupid. I was replying directly to what you posted in this thread and you had to go drag up something else from somewhere else to obfuscate matters.
 
Guess the saying about not arguing with dum-dums is right. The stupid do not know they are stupid. I was replying directly to what you posted in this thread and you had to go drag up something else from somewhere else to obfuscate matters.

What gives U the idea that I was a genius. I can't remember ever saying I wasn't stupid :D:D:D

I guess it takes a "REALLY SMART" person to spend so much time to try to enlighten an "idiot" like me :rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
And the clones from PAP IB finger pointing would be the SDP which is their favorite. When they can't deal with my clones they blamed it on SDP and the moderator. So i tell you, with or without scroobal as moderator i will still kick asses. :D

 
What gives U the idea that I was a genius. I can't remember ever saying I wasn't stupid :D:D:D

Finally some words everyone can agree with.

I guess it takes a "REALLY SMART" person to spend so much time to try to enlighten an "idiot" like me :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Who said anything about enlightening? I just want you to drop dead from shame.
 
And the clones from PAP IB finger pointing would be the SDP which is their favorite. When they can't deal with my clones they blamed it on SDP and the moderator. So i tell you, with or without scroobal as moderator i will still kick asses. :D


What a big man you are....says the Giant to the dwarf.:D
 
Who said anything about enlightening? I just want you to drop dead from shame.

Shame for a "really stupid guy" to be mocked at by a "really smart guy"? Most pple call that bullying and find the act itself pretty shameful. But nevermind :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Shame for a "really stupid guy" to be mocked at by a "really smart guy"? Most pple call that bullying and find the act itself pretty shameful. But nevermind :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

No, not really. I am just helping Mother Nature along in eliminating stupid people like you as patience is not one of my virtues. Saves you from potentially losing $$$ to Nigerians and committing suicide on MRT tracks, causing inconvenience to everyone.
 
Ejay dun just tok cock! where is ur ball? You change ur red tshirt like a flash of lightling dun take ur time here whwhwahahaa

Ya ya ya i am Ejay so happy now? :D Time for the OA to make their daily contribution to this forum. Quick guess which clone i am going to use next. :D
 
One things for sure..

PAP supporters come in all shapes and sizes!! :D
 
Ya ya ya i am Ejay so happy now? :D Time for the OA to make their daily contribution to this forum. Quick guess which clone i am going to use next. :D

Won't be able to tell the difference. All with tiny dicks and shrunken balls.:D
 
Discussions in forums are primarily driven by contentious issues. Singaporeans generally don't complain about tax rate (except GST) or that the Govt spends a lot of money on keeping Singapore Green. Nobody complains about Changi Airport (except some joker who did not find a water in the boarding lounge.)

Even a die heart PAP MP will think that you so blur. Everyone for instance know that the bulk of IR staff are going to be foreigners except you. We never had issues with Indian/Thai construction workers, Filipino/Indonesia maids and Bangladeshi for decades. Language was never an issue until now. Singaporeans are losing jobs, service levels are at an all time low, except for the GDP numbers, the country is not progressing in terms of quality of life.

You seem oblivious to all these things but nitpick on silly things and things that hardly make an impact to Singapore. Singaporeans don't mind paying the school fees which is minor but their issues are job security, recognition that citizenship has privileges and a country that they can associate with.

If you think that those criticisms are wrong or unfair, go for it. Unfortunately your arguments have no basis or insignificant. No one has asked for free school fees except you. Its negligible for the majority. There are more important things to go for like expensive flats for young couples.

These are good and valid observations.

He gives me the impression of being a less informed version of Locke. Someone whose attempts to appear objective have gone too far and now borders on the ludicrous.
 
These are good and valid observations.

He gives me the impression of being a less informed version of Locke. Someone whose attempts to appear objective have gone too far and now borders on the ludicrous.

Yeah I very ill informed. I'm the only one in here who actually bothers to dig up articles provide links to stats I post to support my claims but never mind I'm more ill informed then the average guy who pulls facts out their asses :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Yeah I very ill informed. I'm the only one in here who actually bothers to dig up articles provide links to stats I post to support my claims but never mind I'm more ill informed then the average guy who pulls facts out their asses :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

1. Your reply simply proves my point that they are not well thought out. I NEVER said you are ill informed. I said "less informed version of Locke".

2. It's not your provision of the links, stats, info, etc BUT rather your interpretation and usage (usually in defence of the govt) that is the problem. This makes your facts no better than someone who pulls it from his ass because the end result is the same.

3. There is no point in you acting cool and nonchalant about this thread by using smilies because it does NOT hide the real issue.
 
I tried helping him as he contributes in terms of posts and he takes the trouble to write extensively in serious threads but ends up banging the wall. For some reason, he gets the premise wrong or makes the wrong assumptions.

1. Your reply simply proves my point that they are not well thought out. I NEVER said you are ill informed. I said "less informed version of Locke".

2. It's not your provision of the links, stats, info, etc BUT rather your interpretation and usage (usually in defence of the govt) that is the problem. This makes your facts no better than someone who pulls it from his ass because the end result is the same.

3. There is no point in you acting cool and nonchalant about this thread by using smilies because it does NOT hide the real issue.
 
Back
Top