The world was a better place before xi jinping,.bring out Bo Xilai. He was a pro business leader.
I dun think so, for the most part.
Only two major/minor contentions with him might be wuhan virus and mistreatment of Uighurs/Huis/Muslims under strictly kafir authoritarian commie regime.
That said it's well established that yanke kafir rat CIA dia etc have well established links with east turkestan separatists and spread lots of malicious rumours and intend to separate east turkestan in order weaken their geopolitical rival, they dun give a sh*t abt ordinary Uighurs. they held many Uighrus captive in guantanamo bay cuba and killed plenty of them in syria along side russkies.
it's yanke kafir rats who invaded and killed millions of Muslims of all types on their own home turf. I wonder why putler doesn't dare to transfer
nuclear bombs,
icbm and
anti satellite missiles (
NIA) to any and all anti yanke country, so they can begin by seizing any yankee and western asset found there, transfer tens of trillions of rubles worth of them to russkie territory in exchange for this transaction.
moreover all of their airspace waters can be blocked for yankee and western vehicles aircrafts ships etc. that'd be just deserts.
apart from these two, i think he's yet to do his big things.
things that'll leave a legacy.
like ending tiong civil war, i.e. annexing taiwan, teaching ceca virus a lesson so they know there can't be two tigers in one mountain. correct historical grievances against japs.
pushing yankes out of western pacific at bare minimum maybe more.
surpassing yanke gdp on exchange rate basis under his watch, more importantly ending petrodollar, these might be worth watching. not sure what belt and road holds for futrue and having seen what end of soviet union brought for the rest of the world, i dun think a unipolar tiongcock led world is better for most countries either.
this is why i dun understand why russkie putler does not transfer NIA to any anti yanke countries? with NIA, they can collaborate closely and deal yankee and west a seriousdamage no sisues whatsoever.
it's better for the world to have more than 2 leading "poles",.
worst to best configurations for global order
1. only one global "pole"
2. two global "poles"
3. three global "poles"
4. more than three global "poles"
5. all "major" (how do u define it?) civilizations got their own internally focused largely self sufficient ecosystem for almost everything they need and want incl security defence politics diplomacy sci tech industry religion culture language history cuisine architecture archaeology astronomy & what not, none of these overstep the lines and interfere in the others' internal affairs or business.
.jpg)
