• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Employer won't lose security bond over pregnant maid - Err.. Hoo-pee Yip-ray?

Himiko

Alfrescian
Loyal

Jun 25, 2011

Employer won't lose security bond over pregnant maid


THE Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has clarified that employers no longer stand to lose their $5,000 security bond if a maid gets pregnant, an oft-cited reason why employers are reluctant to give maids a day off.

In a statement to The Straits Times, an MOM spokesman acknowledged that employers should not be held responsible when their maids violate work permit conditions on their own accord, especially outside designated work hours or on their days off.

In view of this, it loosened security bond conditions in January last year.

Under the new rules, employers are merely required to inform maids of the work permit conditions and inform the authorities if a maid breaches any such conditions.

Earlier, if a maid got pregnant, had a child in Singapore or even married a Singaporean without MOM's consent, the employer could stand to lose the security deposit.

However, employers could still see half their security deposit forfeited if a maid absconds and cannot be found.

Read the full story in Saturday's edition of The Straits Times.

Members of the public can e-mail their views and suggestions to mom_fmmd@ mom.gov.sg

 

Himiko

Alfrescian
Loyal

Jun 25, 2011

$5,000 security bond not forfeited if maids get pregnant


THE Ministry of Manpower (MOM) would like to clarify some questions about the security bond posted by employers of foreign domestic workers.

The security bond is aimed at ensuring that employers remain responsible for the proper upkeep and maintenance of, as well as prompt salary payment to, foreign workers. It also prevents illegal deployment and ensures the timely repatriation of foreign workers.

The security bond applies to employers of both foreign domestic and non- domestic workers. These conditions are made known upfront when employers apply for a Work Permit on behalf of their foreign workers.

From 2005 to 2010, MOM forfeited an average of 65 (less than 0.04 per cent) security bonds for maids each year. As of December last year, there were 201,000 maids working in Singapore.

MOM understands employers' concerns that they should not be held responsible when their maids violate the Work Permit conditions on their own accord, especially outside designated work hours or on their rest days.

Therefore, since January last year, MOM has removed employers' liability if the maid gets pregnant or breaches other Work Permit conditions that relate to her own behaviour. It is untrue that the $5,000 security bond will be forfeited for pregnancy.

Even in the extreme case where the maid absconds and the employer is unable to repatriate her, only half of the security bond will be forfeited, so long as the employer has made reasonable efforts to locate the maid.

The forfeited security bond is used to cover repatriation and other related costs once the worker is found, so that it does not exact a cost on taxpayers in Singapore.

This includes the cost of providing food and temporary accommodation, as well as arranging for her repatriation to her home country. This is also the case for non-domestic foreign workers.

MOM is studying the suggestion for the Government to legislate a weekly rest day for maids, with compensation in-lieu when the maid and employer mutually agree that the rest day be forgone.

We will need to consult all stakeholders, including employers, employment agencies, domestic workers and non-governmental organisations.

MOM would like to reassure employers that all views and feedback would be considered. Further, should there be any changes, sufficient notice will be provided.

Members of the public can e-mail their views and suggestions to

[email protected].

Farah Abdul Rahim (Ms)
Director, Corporate Communications
Ministry of Manpower


 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
employers should not be held responsible when their maids violate work permit conditions on their own accord, especially outside designated work hours or on their days off.

I wonder how they are going to determine if the maid comited the act "outside designated work hours or on their days off." :rolleyes:

Will employers have to make a police report for a thorough investigation or is it up to MOM to decide where & when the dastardely act was perpetrated :biggrin:
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
MOM only takes 20 years to figure this out? what a bunch of retards. I guess, its open season on chio maids now by their horny masters.
 

lianbeng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
MOM only takes 20 years to figure this out? what a bunch of retards. I guess, its open season on chio maids now by their horny masters.

lianbeng says, "make ur maid pregnant lah - she must balek kampong u get to keep ur bond. good deal?":biggrin:
 
Top