- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 63,977
- Points
- 113
I mentioned elsewhere about PAP's interference when not called upon. CPF Life is one very good example. Also when they have every reason to as with HC, they did not.
HC *IS* the PAP.
I mentioned elsewhere about PAP's interference when not called upon. CPF Life is one very good example. Also when they have every reason to as with HC, they did not.
HC *IS* the PAP.
I agree with you totally regarding the distribution of wealth to achieve an equitable state. But I wish to point out one area where there should be equality and that in the non-quantitative distribution of human rights. Certain non-quantitative rights of a citizen should be given out equally regardless of wealth and social standing.T
Agreed.I am just being technical about what is a welfare state.In fact,no government on this earth can claim to be in governance without a care for welfare.Hence,it's a question of degree.Oil rich countries like Brunei for example is a mecca of a welfare sate where almost everything is free,...education,health care and ziltch taxation but lacks in the area of human rights.
I am glad you pointed out about human rights because even in communism,the very advocate of absolute welfare state,human rights takes a great beatings and cannot be said to be any better than neo capitalism per ce.But the presumption is human rights must precedes in order to have any form of democracy itself.By the fact that each man or woman has the right to vote.But that right to vote as human rights is just being circumvented as what PAP had done now.By undermining all our independent institutions...blurring the line between executives power and political power,and muzzling the inquiring independent press.In short, PAP had made a mockery of democracy by duplicity.
The pap is not functioning as what a govt shd..It's functioning as a Corporation Management Board and treating Singaporeans as factors of production
I agree with you totally regarding the distribution of wealth to achieve an equitable state. But I wish to point out one area where there should be equality and that in the non-quantitative distribution of human rights. Certain non-quantitative rights of a citizen should be given out equally regardless of wealth and social standing.T
Now when can we receive the results of PT's earth shattering research?
LOL...
bro, not in our life time :o:o:o
bro, those results may be what we need to extend our lives, hehehe........... :p
Correction.All corporate board are accountable.To it's shareholders,to the governing bodies and more.Even in a public listed corporation,all I have do is to own1 share and I can attend it's general meeting and put it's chairman under my scrutiny.Not to mention no corporate company however filthy rich can act suka suka.Because it becomes answerable to the community it lives among.
Not PAP.. None of the company it own,as our trustee, is accountable.Not even to the parliament.PAP is functioning above law.
Absolutely.......................................
Now when can we receive the results of PT's earth shattering research?
LOL...
bro, not in our life time :o:o:o
bro, those results may be what we need to extend our lives, hehehe........... :p
The ball is in MCYS's court..Let's see whether CCS makes a difference to the poor as he claimed that he was from the poor.
some can hardly suppressed their rage at the govt when they find out these people can't qualify for any govt help because of the impossible conditions to be fulfilled and all the overly daunting red tape and paperwork.
The PAP is doing the right thing in making it almost impossible to qualify for assistance. if the process was easy and straightforward with no stringent checks, half of Singapore would be on welfare as sinkies have no qualms about lying, cheating, pushing, shoving and conning when it comes to getting something for nothing.
Leongsam said:The PAP is doing the right thing in making it almost impossible to qualify for assistance. If the process was easy and straightforward with no stringent checks, half of Singapore would be on welfare as sinkies have no qualms about lying, cheating, pushing, shoving and conning when it comes to getting something for nothing.
You can't blame the PAP for having to make the process so laborious. They're forced to do so because they know that Singaporeans are inherently dishonest. The blame for having to impose a host of red tape therefore falls squarely on ordinary Singaporeans and not the ruling party.
At the moment, the base-line is set so overly low, that one would be nearly dead before he can qualify.
PAP has managed to put so many kinks in the works as to render the assistance programme irrelevant.
That's actually a good strategy as it means that the taxpayer only has to subsidise these individuals for a short period of time before they expire. If they were still alive and kicking, the subsidies might have to go on for years and years.