• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Crumbling of Singapore?

After JBJ won the 1981 Anson by-election, it set a precedent i.e. PAP has never again held a complete monopoly of all the seats in Parliament till today![
Many people within the PAP and other parties, actually had very high respects for JBJ for his integrity and sheer support for the down-trodden.

JBJ was surely much more eloquent (in off the cuff speeches) than other PAP leaders, including LKY.

He was a once highly respected District Judge before and fought and won many cases in Court as a lawyer.

He also carried a name that was widely respected in all countries where basic human-rights is a norm.

Name me any case where LKY won laurels!!!!!

However, sadly Kenneth gave the father a poor name when he came into the recent PE By-election.

He should have stayed away from that turf and concentrated where he first stood under the REFORM PARTY.

Whatever it is, JBJ and LKY will always be remembered by the masses.

Forummers can decide for themselves.

Yes, JBJ is Singaporeans' hero
 
The PAP has acknowledged that it finds difficulty integrating 2m foreigners into SG now. Integration will be a nightmare in 2030 if we have 6.9m population.

Are we heading for a lot of social problems with 6.9m population?
 
SIMPLE....

Students - Those who rent HDB flats for dorms, pay school and tution fees, work and contribute...ok.

Professionals - Their skills contribute to specialised areas or bring in more businesses or revenues. Not replication something that S'poreans can do at a cheaper rate...

Businesses - Not more steamboat shops, tuninas, viet joints, bollywood dancing fcuk shops, rapists and maids stealing banglas for christ sake...
 
BABIES???

Lagi simple....

Screen out the men and give preference to foreign women....no to grandpa, grandma, father-in law, sons, daughters, etc.

Take short fart example like famous MBT n his ang mo blondie wife...short peasants have chance to reproduce spartan 300 babies....

We need more of em' pussies...of child bearing age...21-35yo max.

Nights in S'pore can be hot and lonely for these you women...n they need S'pore men company too...
 
Last edited:
GEORGIE YEO: WHITHER PAP WHITHER SINGAPORE

GEORGIE BOY looks at all the old dudes and what he's trying to say is:

SHRIVEL OLD DICKS...SHRIVEL SINGAPORE...cant fuck and produce babies.
 
You ask obvious question for what?

you, your dog, your pinoy maid and your urine mei mei all know a bigger nightmare than now is looming as long as the pappys are in power.

I thot you more intelligent than stating the obvious?
The PAP has acknowledged that it finds difficulty integrating 2m foreigners into SG now. Integration will be a nightmare in 2030 if we have 6.9m population.

Are we heading for a lot of social problems with 6.9m population?
 
You ask obvious question for what?

you, your dog, your pinoy maid and your urine mei mei all know a bigger nightmare than now is looming as long as the pappys are in power.

I thot you more intelligent than stating the obvious?

what is obvious to you may not be obvious to others. what is obvious to others may not be obvious to you. so be empathising and say what you know so that others can benefit from your wisdom rather than keeping quiet and assuming that others know what you know too.

learn also to be patient and accommodate others.

if all of us know what you know, pap wld not be able to get 60% at GE 2011..so we must help those who read Straits Times only and think that the PAP is the World's No 1 and best govt
 
Last edited:
yes you are right, I forget that there are some really weird and unusual people around.

cheers bro
:D

what is obvious to you may not be obvious to others. what is obvious to others may not be obvious to you. so be empathising and say what you know so that others can benefit from your wisdom rather than keeping quiet and assuming that others know what you know too.

learn also to be patient and accommodate others.

if all of us know what you know, pap wld not be able to get 60% at GE 2011..so we must help those who read Straits Times only and think that the PAP is the World's No 1 and best govt
 
We just have to wait till May Day. @HLP :)

It is a tragedy for Singapore and Singaporeans that the SG govt sees it fit to favour and take care of foreigners instead of working for Singaporeans well being.

A double tragedy is when the SG govt accuses Singaporeans who champion "A Singaporeans First" policy as xenophobic. There is nothing wrong with Singaporeans asking for a "Singaporeans First in SG". In fact it is right to ask for a Singaporeans First policy

It wld be xenophobic if we abuse foreigners but to favour Sinagporeans rather than foreigners in our own country is the right thing to do. Almost every country, except the SG govt, favours its citizens.

Let's go to HLP on 1st May and protest against the SG govt favouring foreigners policy. If we keep quiet, things will not change.

So let's voice our protest!
 
De truble here is de gahment has let any old bloke in without any due consideration of any form. Dey justify des due to low birth, but izit really dat or is der more dan meets de eye? If de same thing had happened in HK or Oz, de govt wud have been thrown out of power, but here, despite des, de PAP still rules, thnks a m 2 de 60% dafts. Anyway, I intend 2 b at de rally on May 1 org by Gilbert.
 
De truble here is de gahment has let any old bloke in without any due consideration of any form. Dey justify des due to low birth, but izit really dat or is der more dan meets de eye? If de same thing had happened in HK or Oz, de govt wud have been thrown out of power, but here, despite des, de PAP still rules, thnks a m 2 de 60% dafts. Anyway, I intend 2 b at de rally on May 1 org by Gilbert.

Yes..you got it right. Singaporeans are not against foreigners. But many Singaporeans are against:

1. The pap's recklessness in letting in such a huge influx of foreigners without due consideration to SG's transport infrastructure, hospital beds, limited food and water resources, limited land area, etc

2. PAP's carelessness in not vetting the quality and types of foreigners allowed into SG..was there criminal record checks, qualification checks, etc?

3. PAP's lack of ability and thoroughness in formulating policies

4. PAP's arrogance and lack of transparency when questioned abt their mistakes in letting in so many bad migrants in the last few years

5. PAP's abuse, thinking that they have Singaporeans' mandate to let in more poor quality migrants thereby destroying Singapore's social harmony and SG's future
 
PAP dabbling in demographics is a disaster for Singapore.

They have failed us miserably!
 
PAP dabbling in demographics is a disaster for Singapore.

They have failed us miserably!

Yes, the PAP has failed miserably.

LKY thinks he is "god" and tries do social engineering with Singaporeans to make the SG he wants. LKY and the PAP must humble themselves and know they are mere mortals, no more than the next man beside him.

From dust he comes, to dust will LKY return
 
Back
Top