thank you for giving me face!
From early numbers, we had a clear pattern about at risk groups. Generally 80 and above, male and presenting with a few comorbidities. It was well-established that a great honking bulk of the population was not severely affected by this virus. Early numbers and numbers from China being what they are, there was a reason to take it with a pinch or shaker full of salt.
However, I think authoritarian and totalitarian China set a precedent. It locked down as a response to the virus. Goodness knows what exactly was going on through their minds, but something about fear or fear of losing face may have played a role. Building hospitals and quarantine sites on the spot. And guess what? The western-centric press was ready to go to war with China and they really played the virus up for all it was worth to generate news dollars and/or do their government chums a favour or basically just to shit on China because racist or whatever. So they took all the crap happening there and played it up.
So now there's mass hysteria thanks to great airtime and an overhanded response to a hush hush problem. As far as the world is concerned, this thing could go nuclear if China's (over)reactions and play mute approach were anything to go by. So really, it's a failure on multiple fronts as these things tend to be. Hamfisted Chinese leadership (oxymoron in itself) followed by loud alarmist media.
Now we're stuck with totally zombie economies because of mismanagement, misinformation and too much of the fearful public having a say in policy instead of well-informed and reasonable people.
Should've just kept the oldies or the riskies under gentle lock and key and provided support services like free food delivery and regular checkups. Instead monkey see, monkey do. Another reason to be fearful of Chinese(CPC) precedence.