- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 18,719
- Points
- 0
any scene on sex with an alien?
No. They're trying to avoid Cat III or R rating.
any scene on sex with an alien?
No. They're trying to avoid Cat III or R rating.
I know you will say this:p But it will act as a counter balance too.![]()
The founders of Hinduism and caste system were not ah nehs. They were Aryans. Now their descendants are mostly inhabitants of Germany, Austria, Poland and post-Roman Empire Italy. The ah nehs were the lowest castes.
Reincarnation is a concept originally unique to Hindu caste system. In its original form and in Theravada Buddhism, there's no such thing as reincarnating to animals. Reincarnating to animals was invented by Mahayana Buddhism. In Hinduism, the reincarnation concept is to enforce obedience of the lower and lowest castes. Obedience and doing your dues shall earn you promotion to a higher caste in your next life. In this life, just do your job and slog. Otherwise, you'll be in perpetual suffering lifetime after lifetime as lower castes are slaves and untouchables.
![]()
That's what PAP elites are trying to do to the old folks here ! Mediacorpse dramas and radio propaganda are creating this kind of thought to make citizens into modern peasantry. Today, I heard a Mandarin radio station uttering NS-is-good-for-you crap again. Wake up !
![]()
The whites lah ! They were the high class people possibly Northern Indians ? The Southern Indians are shorter with more haplogroup O genes ?
The original Romans are actually white NOT Arabs or Northern Africans. They were the ones called patricians (or elites) and the migrants or commoners as plebeians. That's why modern Italians have dark skin tones because they aren't white.
Who were Vedic people anyway ? I heard they came from East Africa too.
![]()
The whites lah ! They were the high class people possibly Northern Indians ? The Southern Indians are shorter with more haplogroup O genes ?
The original Romans are actually white NOT Arabs or Northern Africans. They were the ones called patricians (or elites) and the migrants or commoners as plebeians. That's why modern Italians have dark skin tones because they aren't white.
Who were Vedic people anyway ? I heard they came from East Africa too.
Sorry Bro, couldn't quite understand what he meant.
You mentioned the Romans are actually white but then you say the Italians have dark skin because they aren't white. Romans and Italians are different here?
the law of karma provides a good deal of comfort. it assumes that the universe is a fair place. It tells us that evil people and good people will eventually get what they deserve. however i find few flaws......
1)the goal of life according to this ancient belief is to escape samsara which means rebirth. this means that we are here because of past evil doings therefore we must suffer to pay for those evil doings. no matter what this strips us of free will and without free will how can we choose to do good or evil.
2)i believe to maintain the balance of the universe if we must return to endure past evil doings we must also return to be rewarded for doing good. so i ask if we do evil we must return and if we do good we must still return, then how can we possibly escape rebirth?
3) if karma was real, wouldnt we expect to see the world getting better and better. correct me if I am wrong but countries that believe in karma are suffering from serious poverty.
4) i see bad things happen to 'good' people, and good things happen to 'bad' people. now if everyone got what they deserved accroding to their actions and so on, and therefore we're trying to be better to get a better life, just like how petesmith asked, why arn't everyone getting better?
5) karma cannot be real, based on the fact that you'd have to know what right and wrong are. animals are a good example to disprove karma because animals do not know what right or wrong is, only humans develop this "right or wrong" concept and in the religions where karma is an important concept, there is also rebirth and if you are reborn as something other than a human, you're fucked. karma is supposedly supposed to apply to all living things, and if humans are the only ones able to grasp right and wrong, it's obviously false.
6) say in one life your a corrupt billionaire and you've done all these horrible things to people. in your next life your a beggar on the side of the street. And say i go walking by this beggar, and he begs me for change, and i feel aversion and dont give him any. i get bad karma now. but that beggar deserves what hes getting. i think that karma is too simple to be applied to such a confusing, overlapping world.![]()
Bro,
Karma, losely speaking, is about "cause and effect". It never say anything about good cause = good effect, bad cause = bad effect.
Buddhist teachings in fact tells us to see through the dualism you are talking about.
Things just happen. There's no need to label them good or bad.
P/S And yes good guys always finish last, don't ask me why.![]()
the law of karma provides a good deal of comfort. it assumes that the universe is a fair place. It tells us that evil people and good people will eventually get what they deserve. however i find few flaws......
1)the goal of life according to this ancient belief is to escape samsara which means rebirth. this means that we are here because of past evil doings therefore we must suffer to pay for those evil doings. no matter what this strips us of free will and without free will how can we choose to do good or evil.
2)i believe to maintain the balance of the universe if we must return to endure past evil doings we must also return to be rewarded for doing good. so i ask if we do evil we must return and if we do good we must still return, then how can we possibly escape rebirth?
3) if karma was real, wouldnt we expect to see the world getting better and better. correct me if I am wrong but countries that believe in karma are suffering from serious poverty.
4) i see bad things happen to 'good' people, and good things happen to 'bad' people. now if everyone got what they deserved accroding to their actions and so on, and therefore we're trying to be better to get a better life, just like how petesmith asked, why arn't everyone getting better?
5) karma cannot be real, based on the fact that you'd have to know what right and wrong are. animals are a good example to disprove karma because animals do not know what right or wrong is, only humans develop this "right or wrong" concept and in the religions where karma is an important concept, there is also rebirth and if you are reborn as something other than a human, you're fucked. karma is supposedly supposed to apply to all living things, and if humans are the only ones able to grasp right and wrong, it's obviously false.
6) say in one life your a corrupt billionaire and you've done all these horrible things to people. in your next life your a beggar on the side of the street. And say i go walking by this beggar, and he begs me for change, and i feel aversion and dont give him any. i get bad karma now. but that beggar deserves what hes getting. i think that karma is too simple to be applied to such a confusing, overlapping world.![]()
Think about it! Good guys goes heaven bad guys go to hell! What are the properties available upside & what kind of facilities are available? Buddhism professes that all will end up in hell & then redistributed, very scientific also what = recycling! Gotten rid of & disposed of to be reincarnated! Other religion just keep on piling up the numbers! And by the way, Buddhism was never & will never be a religion because it is strictly a practice of WAY OF LIFE! The scriptures are just written by humans just like the bible & quran written by some sideshow bob gaining the power & adding their own opinions as they garnerned enough power to edit the scripts!