Before i start, I would like to ask: Can you take criticism of this nature well?
This is not about taking criticism or giving criticism. It's about nationalism. Why can't they use the "soft" propaganda approach? Go ahead and spin tales about the superiority of Singaporeans. It may start off as a charade but after awhile people may just buy that and start feeling nationalistic. Nationalistic people are proud people. I would like to think that proud people are productive given the GDP/Capita of proud nations like Japan, Germany, USA etc.....
It is about soul-searching, look for room for improvement.
Thousands of Singaporeans leaving SG to migrate willingly to OZ/US/UK/Can (mostly), in search of better living/education/Salary... they become other countries's immigrants, then they fight for equal rights, equal employment opportunity..
The very same things they reluctantly/unwillingly gave to the new immigrants coming to SG.
Some highly educated SG immigrants in OZ/UK/US are willing to drop their pride/expectations to work in (or start) restaurants (including cleaning the toilet). Somthing they would not do in SG.
Proud people are productive people?
So do you think the criticism approach is going to work? Maybe for some, but definitely not for the majority. Not many people can take criticism well. I seriously do not find their criticism constructive at all. They emphasize too much on the so-called "capabilities" of the FTs; this seriously make their criticism very bias.
I have heard enough of immigrants/FT bashing in every megazine/news outlets. It is refreshing to hear something different. A healthy debate is to have both sides of story told in many ways.
What the fuck do they expect!? As an economy advances, people will of course shun lower end jobs mainly because of the low wages and also because it is damn sia suay to work in this kind of job.
If so sia-suay, then they should not apply for the job in the first place. Call the company to figure out what the job entails, before submitting the resume.
I am sure that everyone would not mind starting from the bottom of the ladder PROVIDED that that job is really what he / she likes to do. Face it man, Singapore is relatively advance compared to neighbouring countries. Please do not expect us all to start from the bottom of the ladder just so we can make heaps of money and end up selling our body to the company.
In the advanced-countries like US/OZ/UK, they are lots of local abled-bodies men and women working in construction sites, landscaping, labour works, flipping hamburgers.. there is nothing to shame about it, it is honor job for honor wage. Only people who want to lay 'shame' on these people need to be shameful.
If one is so qualified, having right skill-sets and competent, I am sure they will not need to apply for those 'low-skill', 'low-pay' jobs.
Have you not heard of the backward bending labour supply curve? Have you not come across advance countries being more concern about Gross National Happiness rather than the GDP/Capita? Wake up man! We are not slaves!
I do not know about GNH, if one has no job, no money.. it cannot be a happy thing.. regardless where he/she lives.
Australia is just one of the few exception. Many rich countries are without natural resources but yet they can afford decent minimum wages and workplace protection to mitigate the negative perceptions of working in lower end jobs.
I do not think that in countries with minimum wages have NO negative perceptions/stigma attached to those low-end jobs.
One of reasons why racism exists in some countries, is because the society thinks/believes some 'races' are incompetent/inferior/unfit... to hold a decent/(high-end) job.