The problem is not SDP's withdrawal, but how their withdrawal contrasted with their insistence on contesting and all the drama that came along.
I don't have a hotline to the SDP CEC. 2 possibilities: 1. they wanted to contest while hoping to achieve a consensus with the other parties, but pulled out when that consensus could not be achieved; 2. it could be a ploy to convince supporters how SDP's call for unity will be rebuffed.
Either way, it was a move for unity, and puts the ball firmly in WP's court.
Those sighing in relief are mostly pan-opposition supporters who do not want to see a 3CF. They still make up most of those who support the opposition. SDP supporters should not create further damage by pissing them off by calling them WP supporters.
Not exactly true.
3 groups of supporters:
1. SDP supporters: they want SDP to contest and they're willing to accept 3CF because they know WP doesn't give a damn to other oppo parties
2. Non-partisan opposition supporters: there are some, as you say, who want a 2CF, whether it's WP vs PAP or SDP vs PAP - Scroobal was in this camp initially. But the more cynical ones I spoke to know that a deal can't be reached, but they want the best guy to go in because of WP's mediocre performance in parliament - for these folks, a 3CF is a given.
3. WP supporters - I think the majority would like a 2CF - judging by the responses here - for the simple reason that any other oppo party will
split the vote, whether it loses its deposit or not.
As for reciprocation, all the more this episode will make WP regard SDP less for one simple reason. If SDP really believed in avoiding 3CF, they would not have even announced that they want to contest.
Most neutral observers would see this as SDP giving way in HG and PE. If SDP had announced right at the outset that it wasn't contesting, as NSP had done, it wouldn't have shown up WP's arrogance and the lack of opposition unity really boils down to one party.