i think ah cao is just saying that to appear like a good guy to the press nia. I'm not very sure about the paternity laws in singapore but in the US i think you have a responsibility to take care of the child if it's yours that's why they have shows like maury whereby the men are so happy when the dna test comes out negative. If there was no need to be reponsible then there wouldn't be a need for a dna test wouldn't it?
Yes i remember that show and that makes sense for the US but do the same rules apply in singapore?
With all due respect to wendychan (i am familiar with her background and I do sympathise greatly with her - human to human), I am not a believer that a woman has a right to hold a man's wealth hostage simply because she decides to have a kid against the man's wishes or without his knowledge unless he refuses to help her get an abortion.
Once she exercises her own right to have the kid, then she willfully accepts personal responsibility for the kid and cannot ask it of another person, IMO.
All this should not apply when a couple is married, of course. In a marriage, promises are made. Or if a unmarried guy like terrence cao stands up and accepts responsibility even though he doesnt have to, in fact thats a very respectable thing to do
At least this is what I believe. And always thought the law went along these lines. Now i start to wonder
Hence the question
