• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Following koranic laws, Muslim rapist released from jail on condition that he marries his victim

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
You do not need to be a soldier and die young in a war.
Just be a good Muslim and stay within the bounds Allah has decided for you and you will get the same heaven and more.

It is mentioned in the holy books, when you (a soldier who dreams of hot babes in heaven) killed or are killed for Allah's cause, the reward in paradise will be tremendous.


Surah 4:74: So let those who trade the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in Allah’s cause. Whoever fights in Allah’s cause, whether he is killed or victorious, We will grant him a tremendous reward. (Ali Unal)


Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing..
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is mentioned in the holy books, when you (a soldier who dreams of hot babes in heaven) killed or are killed for Allah's cause, the reward in paradise will be tremendous.


Surah 4:74: So let those who trade the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in Allah’s cause. Whoever fights in Allah’s cause, whether he is killed or victorious, We will grant him a tremendous reward. (Ali Unal)


Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing..
The only fighting allowed is a just war. Meaning self defense. Then if you join in that fight and die, then you will get rewarded.

Naughty you for not including 2:190
"Fight in the cause of Allah ˹only˺ against those who wage war against you, but do not exceed the limits.1 Allah does not like transgressors."
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Until today you cannot point to a falsehood in the Quran. That is the only scripture from Allah that is preserved.

You are wrong. In all our discussions, I have consistently pointed out to falsehoods in the quran, mahomet's character and his claims to prophethood. Even your own hadiths admit that the quran has been edited by the scribes to improve its literary content.

Now if you want me to show falsehood in the bible just let me know, but you won't dare.

You've always been welcome to post stuff in the Bible. This is an internet forum. Nothing about dare or don't dare. You're again engaging in exaggerations to make yourself look more credible.

Mary had a brother named Haroon. Not the Aaron that lived centuries before. Your feeble mind must think that there is only one Aaron throughout history.

That's incorrect. Again, you don't know your own religion well enough and are making up lies to cover up your quran's mistakes.

The parents of Mary, mother of Jesus, are Joachim and Anne. There is no record of other siblings of Mary. moslems allege that Mary was from the lineage of Aaron, brother of Moses. Hence, the honoric 'Sister of Aaron' title in the quran. Learn your own islamic religion better before debating.

Or let me guess, your quran, written centuries after the life of Joachim and Anne, invented siblings' names for Mary to cover up its mistakes?
 
Last edited:

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The only fighting allowed is a just war. Meaning self defense. Then if you join in that fight and die, then you will get rewarded.

Naughty you for not including 2:190
"Fight in the cause of Allah ˹only˺ against those who wage war against you, but do not exceed the limits.1 Allah does not like transgressors."

Does allah like the Ottomans, Timurids or Delhi sultanates? Storming cities and invading lands are considered self defense to mohammedans?
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
Does allah like the Ottomans, Timurids or Delhi sultanates? Storming cities and invading lands are considered self defense to mohammedans?
Do learn the difference between a political war and religious war.
Ask one of your idols if you're unsure.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Do learn the difference between a political war and religious war.

No difference between political and religious wars to mohammedans. Again, you reveal your ignorance of islam.

turkish tv shows portray moslems offering islamic prayers before storming Constantinople in one of the moslems' political/religious wars.


Ask one of your idols if you're unsure.

I'm not a moslem. Unlike idol-worshipping moslems, I don't bow before idols.

1673357020551.png
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
You are wrong. In all our discussions, I have consistently pointed out to falsehoods in the quran, mahomet's character and his claims to prophethood. Even your own hadiths admit that the quran has been edited by the scribes to improve its literary content.



You've always been welcome to post stuff in the Bible. This is an internet forum. Nothing about dare or don't dare. You're again engaging in exaggerations to make yourself look more credible.
You have not pointed to a single error or contradiction in the Quran.

Now here are plenty of errors in your bible as compiled by your own scholars:

GE 2:7, 19 Man was created before animals were created GE 1:26-27 Man and woman were created at the same time.
GE 2:7, 21-22 Man was created first, woman sometime later

Clear Contradictions:
“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.” — Exodus 20:8
“One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.” — Romans 14:5
“… the earth abideth for ever.” — Ecclesiastes 1:4
“… the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.” — 2Peter 3:10
“… with God all things are possible.” — Matthew 19:26
“…The LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron.” — Judges 1:19
I could go on and on endlessly.
That's incorrect. Again, you don't know your own religion well enough and are making up lies to cover up your quran's mistakes.

The parents of Mary, mother of Jesus, are Joachim and Anne. There is no record of other siblings of Mary. moslems allege that Mary was from the lineage of Aaron, brother of Moses. Hence, the honoric 'Sister of Aaron' title in the quran. Learn your own islamic religion better before debating.

Or let me guess, your quran, written centuries after the life of Joachim and Anne, invented siblings' names for Mary to cover up its mistakes?

In the bible it describes the ruler during the time of Joseph as 'Pharoah'.
But in the Quran it describes that same ruler as 'King'.
Archeologist today anonymously agree that the ruler was correctly titled as 'King' because he was a conquerer from Hexos and not a native Egyptian and thus, do not take the title of Pharoah.
This fact is only found late in the 18th century/early 19th century.
Your bible got it wrong again.
As above, time will reveal the mistakes of the bible because nowhere does the Quran cite that Aaron is Mary's descendant. Unless you can quote it.
I'm not a moslem. Unlike idol-worshipping moslems, I don't bow before idols.
You sure do:

1673358690225.png
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
You have not pointed to a single error or contradiction in the Quran.

Actually I have. You just chose to ignore those posts whenever it embarrassed you. Just like you were embarrassed that your own mahomet doesn't even obey his own islamic laws and you chose not to continue the debate.

Go read all our past threads on suns setting in a muddy pool, mahomet mixing up Mary with Mariam, how your 'allah' made people, the number of days your allah needed to make the earth, 'no compulsion in islam', etc etc


I could go on and on endlessly.

So keep going on endlessly.

Don't you get tired of exaggerations? Exaggerations really is in your islamic blood, isn't it?


Clear Contradictions:
“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.” — Exodus 20:8
“One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.” — Romans 14:5

What's the contradiction?

The Bible is about letting every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. In contrast, moslems are told to submit or die.

In the bible it describes the ruler during the time of Joseph as 'Pharoah'.
But in the Quran it describes that same ruler as 'King'.
Archeologist today anonymously agree that the ruler was correctly titled as 'King' because he was a conquerer from Hexos and not a native Egyptian and thus, do not take the title of Pharoah.

You should read the Bible more carefully before trying to pick at it. The book of Exodus referred to the oppressive ruler of Egypt as 'king'.

Then a new king, to whom Joseph meant nothing, came to power in Egypt. 9 “Look,” he said to his people, “the Israelites have become far too numerous for us. 10 Come, we must deal shrewdly with them or they will become even more numerous and, if war breaks out, will join our enemies, fight against us and leave the country.”
Exodus 1:8-9



because nowhere does the Quran cite that Aaron is Mary's descendant. Unless you can quote it.

I didn't say Aaron is Mary's descendant. Are you retarded?
 
Last edited:

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Actually its your scholars themselves that admit there are errors is your bible:

My scholars??

Unlike the mohammedan religion, Christians are encouraged to study the Bible for themselves instead of blinding following "religious scholars". Sucking religious scholars' dicks is a mohammedan thing. No "scholar" speaks for any Christian, regardless whether they praise or criticize the Bible.

There are more but you can google it yourself.

Try Googling for yourself why the quran fucked up between Mary and Mariam, sister of Aaron. The mohammedan scholars, whose collective dicks you suck, say that Mary was supposedly from the lineage of Aaron, hence the title 'Sister of Aaron'.

Only morons like you, without knowing what your own scholars already said, made up crap by saying Mary, mother of Jesus, had a brother called Aaron or Harun.
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
My scholars??

Unlike the mohammedan religion, Christians are encouraged to study the Bible for themselves instead of blinding following "religious scholars". Sucking religious scholars' dicks is a mohammedan thing. No "scholar" speaks for any Christian, regardless whether they praise or criticize the Bible.



Try Googling for yourself why the quran fucked up between Mary and Mariam, sister of Aaron. The mohammedan scholars, whose collective dicks you suck, say that Mary was supposedly from the lineage of Aaron, hence the title 'Sister of Aaron'.

Only morons like you, without knowing what your own scholars already said, made up crap by saying Mary, mother of Jesus, had a brother called Aaron or Harun.
JT do you know this guy and experienced any thrill with him?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-64231261.amp
 

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
The only fighting allowed is a just war. Meaning self defense. Then if you join in that fight and die, then you will get rewarded.

Naughty you for not including 2:190
"Fight in the cause of Allah ˹only˺ against those who wage war against you, but do not exceed the limits.1 Allah does not like transgressors."

I would prefer you to not bring out the verse 2:190, as most muslims throughout the history of islam don't practice it, maybe few muis muslims like youself do. This verse has the same fate as the verse that says there is no compulsion in Islam, but sharia-ly(pun on the word legally) an apostate can be killed for leaving islam. And it is considered just killing in islam.

Any attacking war that muslims initiated can easy be twisted to be a just war or jihad. Killing infidels and capturing their lands can also be justified as for the cause of Allah and expanding islam.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
What evidence? Can be found in the Quran? Died momentarily, you mean fainted?
Clinical death my friend. To a dark place where time and space have no meaning. Some were tormented for ages, others never wanted to leave. And suddenly, they are revived and alive again. Just for a moment, but their adventures were much longer.
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
I would prefer you to not bring out the verse 2:190, as most muslims throughout the history of islam don't practice it, maybe few muis muslims like youself do. This verse has the same fate as the verse that says there is no compulsion in Islam, but sharia-ly(pun on the word legally) an apostate can be killed for leaving islam. And it is considered just killing in islam.

Any attacking war that muslims initiated can easy be twisted to be a just war or jihad. Killing infidels and capturing their lands can also be justified as for the cause of Allah and expanding islam.
Get it into your head
Islam is not about muslims.
Islam is the laws Allah has brought down for people to adhere. Those not sticking to it, you cannot blame Islam but the people themselves.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
Please educate us on which Quranic verses that allow that.

CECA virus can't do that. That would expose all the falsehoods that they propagate.

Like his entire religion built on a house of cards. It will come tumbling down if he dares to quote which Quranic law is that he falsely accuses of permitting such crimes.


He apparently forgot much of his own religion.

https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/krishna-the-god-of-incest.323879/



Besides being a child-molester, `holy' Rama was also guilty of incest, For Sita is referred to in the oldest surviving Ramayanas as his own sister.

In the Dasarathajataka Sita is represented as the sister as well as the wife of Rama, Son of Dasaratha of the Ikshvaku line. " [ Chandra, P. 156 ]


So we see that hari and his mom were only practising a religious hindu ritual, Not knocking boots. What a disgusting religion.

This is confirmed by anthropological research showing that incest was institutionalised in Rama's race, The Ikshvaku dynasty of Aryan Kshatriyas.

The term Devadasi originally described a Hindu religious practice in which girls were "married" to a deity.
This practice has been corrupted over the ages. The initiation process and so called coming-of-age rites for girls are used by the temple priests to have sex with 12-13 year old girls. All this is done willingly, Under the cover of "religion".The basic fact is if you want to go and dedicate your life to God then it is your choice. The key word here is choice. Can a 9 - 12 year old girl choose this? Or is it just something that she is forced to do?

Krishna's Incest with His Sister
Deepti Naidu
Krishna is worshipped as the supreme god by many followers of the Aryan Vaishnava religion. This eminent personality had 16, 000 wives and many affairs with the cow-herdesses (gopis), Who were the wives of other men. The worst aspect of this supposed `god', However, Is that `Lord' Krishna lived in incest with his sister Subhadra! Not only that, He shared her with his brother Balarama [ Mah. Wh. 153 ]. So one big family of incest! The Mahabharat clearly mentions this in its oldest extant versions.

Thus, "In the festivals of that God [ Jagannath ], The 3 images of Krishna, His brother Balarama, And his sister Subhadra, Are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap reproaches upon Krishna, And upon his sister likewise, For having indulged in a criminal intimacy. " -- [ Mah. Wh 153 ]

Despite the fact that the bigoted Vaishnavas have tried to erase this stain from the later versions of the Mahabharata, The older versions clearly state the facts and expose Krishna's dirty linen for all to see.







Krishna's Incest with His Sister
by Deepti Naidu
Krishna is worshipped as the supreme god by many followers of the Aryan
Vaishnava religion. This eminent personality had
16,000 wives and many affairs with the cow-herdesses (gopis), who were the
wives of other men. The worst aspect of this
supposed `god', however, is that `Lord' Krishna lived in incest with his
sister Subhadra ! Not only that, he shared her with his
brother Balarama [ Mah.wh.153 ]. So one big family of incest ! The
Mahabharat clearly mentions this in its oldest extant
versions. Thus,
"In the festivals of that God [ Jagannath ], the 3 images of Krishna,
his brother Balarama, and his sister Subhadra,
are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap
reproaches upon Krishna, and upon his
sister likewise, for having indulged in a criminal intimacy."
-- [ Mah.wh 153 ]
Despite the fact that the bigoted Vaishnavas have tried to erase this
stain from the later versions of the Mahabharata, the
older versions clearly state the facts and expose Krishna's dirty linen
for all to see.
" In the older tradition, Subhadra is said to have lived in criminal
intimacy with both her brothers. This tradition is
universally known and believed by the people in spite of the story of
the marriage of Subhadra [ to Arjun ]; and the
Mussalmans frequently taunt the Hindus with the fact. The Pundits
reconcile the stories by a fiction of there having
been two Subhadras. As to Krishna's proceedings, they are expalined
away as Maya, or delusion."
-- [ Mah.wh.153 ]
Remember, it is Krishna the Killer who was the cause of the Mahabharata
War. It is also Krishna who advised his warriors to
use cowardly and shady tricks like striking below the belt and attacking
opponents from behind during the Mahabharata War
! As a `divine punishment' for his cruelties and mass rape of 16,000
Indigenous Sudra women, he was killed by an archer,
his city (or village - how could barbaric Aryan Krishna even think of
living in a city ?) of Dwaraka was flooded, and his wives
all forced into prostitution. A just punishment indeed for Killer Krishna
!
The Brahmans always profess to be very strict in morality, so how does one
explain the discreapancy between their
supposed brahmacharya and their debauched gods ? The answer is that the
Aryans were highly primitive barbarians. They
introduced such uncouth practices as human sacrifice (`purushamedha'
sanctioned by the Vedas), horse sacrifice
(`ashwamedha'), widow-burning (`sati') and incest into India. The morality
of the ancient Aryans was very strict, being
another aspect of their lack of regard for human life. Thus, Manu
prescribes death for even talking to a married woman. This
was not limited to the Indo-Aryans, the German Aryan warrior would
instantly slay his erring wife and her paramour at the
slightest suspicion. As a result of such a strict and unnatural moral
code, which was even more severe than the Christian
one, a number of perversions arose, such as incest and beastiality. Incest
was very common in Vedic and Brahmanic society
as a method of releasing the suppressed urges, Indeed, the Vedas sanction
incest and allow it as a perfectly legitimate way
of gratification -
Brahma performed incest with his dauther [ Rig Veda III.31.1-2 ]. The
Vedas justify incest, and this fact was used by
Brahma to convince his daughter. When this was discovered, Prajapati
(Brahma) was pierced by Agni as a punishment
[ Sat.Br. XIII.9 ] [ Apte 63 ]. Brahma also, out of frustration,
copulated with a bear. This shows that the laws of morality
were very strict, and hence led to perversions in Hinduism.
In the Vedas the hero Pushan is the lover of his sister [ Rg Ved
VI.55.4 ] [ Apte 11 ]
The Vedic god Agni himself, who pierced Brahma for his incest with his
daughter, is also the lover of his own sister [ Rg
Ved X.3.3 ] [ Apte 11 ]. This shows that the strict moral code was
meant merely as a facade for the public. Like some
Victorians in private, the Vedic Aryans engaged in serious
perversions.
The Vedic Ashvins are referred to as the sons of Savitar and Ushas who
are brother and sister [ Apte 11 ].
The Ashvisns married Surya and Savitri who is their sister [ RgV
I.116.19 ].
The Vedic fire-god Agni is the son of his father and his sister [ Rg
Ved.I.91.7 ]
The Vedic god of the underworld Yama wards off his sister Yami, saying
marriage between brother and sister is
forbidden [ Rg.V.X.10 ] [ Apte 11 ]
The Kinsey survey of the USA revealed that beastiality and incest were
common in regions where persons did not have the
opportunity for healthy interaction with the opposite gender, and hence
had to relieve their pent-up urges in perverted
fashions. This was also the case for the Vedic Aryans and Victorian
England. Surveys show that incest is still widespread
amongst Aryan Vaishnavas today, as a result of the fanatic Vaishnava
repression of such desires (a la Gandhi).
In addition, the child marriage of brother and sister, and in fact between
any close relations, was encoouraged by the
Brahmans in order to destroy the genetic stock of non-Brahman races, since
children born of such consanginous unions are
likely to display genetic degradation. In this manner the Brahmin Aryans
are away at the genetic heritage of the
non-Brahmins. The ghastly custom was enforced in South India (where all
the non-Brahmins are Dravidian) as well as in
North India (where only the Dalits and Adivasis are Dravidoid) on Aryan
and Dravidians alike.

References
[ Apte ] = `The Sacrament of Marriage in Hindu Society' , U.M.Apte, Ajanta
Publishers 1978 Delhi
[ Mah.wh ] = `India of the Vedic Age with reference to the Mahabharata',
J.Talboys Wheeler, reprint 1973, Cosmo Publications, Delhi
[ Rg Ved ] = Rig Veda
 
Top