Which earlier post? I have not problem doing the reposting but you need to be specific.
Chop off your hands one. Until you have read a couple of Bible commentaries on this, you should stop making a fool of yourself with your failed interpretation. I don't know why you are so hard on yourself by making it so easy for me to thrash your posts.
Show your early post first, I want to repost it.
You go read your own post about Jesus teaching about cutting off limbs and why we are not taking it literally.
Just tell me what you know about hermeneutics. Silence would be your best answer.
You will evade this using your usual tactic bred by your cult faith.
You don't have much theological knowledge, throw in a chiam word to avoid answering the original question, wtf! This is not the first time you employed such tactic. I am a lowly educated fart, most of the old timers know that. I am like some high tone educated farts who make unsubstantiated posts, evasive and go round in circle.
Give you an opportunity to show your hermeneutics knowledge...Tell the thread readers(not me) how to interpret who is right. One bible writer wrote Jackie is the father of Joseph, another one wrote Hairly is the father. Educate them your bible interpretation skill...What I can say you are lumpar 1 in gong jiao way
See there....this fraudo goes again round in circle making his usual evasive or unsubstantiated post...
Speak for yourself
So I have spoken for myself. Now you turn to speak on your hermeneutics knowledge.
Fraudo is a LIAR and dua kang kia. :p
Very well, substantiate yourself on your words hermeneutics.
Gong so much lanjiao way, in the end can't explain what that word means. Who is right on who is Joseph's father? No surprise you are still unable to answer because the Bible is the words of men had
As explained, this is self-education for you. I ask questions you answer, great learning mode for you. Remember you have tons of unlearning to do.
This a really a self-education for me and the forum readers even the 'true' christian Fraudo can't tell who is right about Joseph's father. The bible is full of errors and simply the words of ancient savage men.
One thing I can tell you, you are wrong.
Both genealogies are right. So you really think there is absolutely no way that both accounts can be right? You have exhausted ALL possible explanations?