It just works, that's why no critic what. How can be not work and have no critics? Don't you all have oppies in parliament?Most foreigners, including the so called experts, have no clue on the realities of the programs here. They take the PAP's version wholesale and give it a thumbs up. A good analyst would look at the critics as well ...unfortunately, there are no critics to be found, mainly because peesai is so irrelevant globally.
actually it's true. it's a global phenomenon. everywhere in the world, working harder getting poorer.
but hoffy, c'mon lah, it's not the chinese workers fault solely. there are a few more factors in play. namely american corporate greed, consumer want cheap want fresh, etc... the poor work his ass of for peanuts chinese worker is only the channel by which this is happening. America can easily counter China's rise.
Get rid of the unions run by for-profit union gangsters and focus on improving product.
sang nila utama ...That one person who changed evrything is lky or raffles?
sang nila utama ...
That retard from Indonesia who thought he saw a lion when in actual fact it was a wild boar?
Singapore after 1965
booms town CharLee under our ah gong
but now, Sink-a-por under ah gong dishonorable son
is beginning to sink
that is why Sink-a-por needs to spends billions to reclaim our land
Cheap workers are a bane upon the modern markets. Cheap workers exists because of the exploitation by companies. Companies exploit workers through the laws of the country.
Currently China is the biggest source of cheap labour and their economic policies exploit this at the cost of workers everywhere else.
At one point, unions were the defenders of the workers
Cheap workers are a bane upon the modern markets. Cheap workers exists because of the exploitation by companies. Companies exploit workers through the laws of the country.
Currently China is the biggest source of cheap labour and their economic policies exploit this at the cost of workers everywhere else.
At one point, unions were the defenders of the workers
KNN it's far better to be own cheap worker than to be someone else's cheap worker KNNIt's far better to be a cheap worker than to be unemployed.
It's far better to be a cheap worker than to be unemployed.
And it's far better to eat Cake than Bread. 1789.
yup! but my version of what you said is that cheap workers exist and are exploited by companies because the laws of the country allow it and their leaders implicitly encourage it. companies alone cannot do it without political backing.
yah, I guess you're rite, but I don't think they were thinking that far ahead. the politicos thinking of their fat bribes and their workers just desperate to feed themselves.
I was a cheap worker for the yanks from 1977 to 1986. I earned a measly $950 pm doing the same job that my counterparts in America were being paid 5x what I earned.
It is thanks to the yanks that I am retired today.
Had that cheap labour job not been made available to me I would have been unemployed or severely under employed.
Please......... If u were earning $950 in Singapore during that period, u were well remunerated. Probably even higher pay than an officer in the SAF.
My point exactly. What is termed as cheap labor is considered to be good money by the person being paid.
"Cheap" labor in China lifted 600 million peasants out of poverty in the last 20 years.
I am happy for the peasants. But please don't impose that ideology on me, where we live to work (for the State) then to die. That facist thinking serves only to enrich the Masters at the top.
We are not economic digits to be manipulated for the glory of the State.
Get rid of the unions run by for-profit union gangsters and focus on improving product.
Of course you don't devote your whole life to being a digit. What you need to do is to learn from the experience and then move on and up the pecking order.
The yanks taught me what I needed to know to get ahead in life. They paid me shit by their standards but they provided me with great opportunities for which I am forever grateful.