Wp-1, pap-0

[TracyTan866]

Present Situation - Retirement age for Singapore High Court Judges is 65. Singapore is short of HC Judges.

PAP's Solution - Extend selected HC Judges retirement to 70years old

WP's Solution - Extend all HC Judges retirement to 70years old.

Problem with PAP's solution - allows PAP to show favouritism and encourages cronyism.

Merit of WP solution - pap cant favour Judges it like

PAP acknowledges that WP's recommendation is good and cant disagree with it. But PAP still insists on going ahead with selectively offering extension of service to Judges.

Even a donkey knows that WP's solution is superior to PAP's. And we have million dollar PAP ministers coming out with such idiotic and immoral solution!

WP-1, PAP-0

 

[swimorsink]

Did WP score or was it an own goal?

 

[TracyTan866]

Did WP score or was it an own goal?

WP scored...

 

[LEGEND]

Goalllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!

 

[TracyTan866]

Goalllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!

Thanks, a big 1 up for WP.

Shame for pap

 

[Reddog]

Did WP score or was it an own goal?

No matter. WP won.

 

[zeebjii]

No matter. WP won.

How? Their proposal wasn't taken up!

 

[ILovePAP]

Or else how we PAP win defamation suits...

 

[Cestbon]

Agree!!!
Why selective????
Is either all or none.

If selective mean something wrong!!! Or Judge not qualify. If not qualify why qualify to be judge in the beginning.

 

[tanwahp]

Or else how we PAP win defamation suits...

Well, the PAP can continue to file more defamation suits. I am surprised they haven't done that on some of the opposition leaders but only a blogger.

 

[TracyTan866]

No matter. WP won.

Yes, WP won that one hands down.

With so many bad pap decisions, WP got to start hitting the pap hard

 

[TracyTan866]

How? Their proposal wasn't taken up!

WP's solid and good proposal not taken up reflects badly on the pap, not WP

 

[TracyTan866]

Or else how we PAP win defamation suits...

PAP winning dubious suits will hammer more nails into pap's coffin

 

[TracyTan866]

Agree!!!
Why selective????
Is either all or none.

If selective mean something wrong!!! Or Judge not qualify. If not qualify why qualify to be judge in the beginning.

Selective so the pap can use tenure extension to control Judges and reward obedient Judges who do pap's bidding

 

[TracyTan866]

Well, the PAP can continue to file more defamation suits. I am surprised they haven't done that on some of the opposition leaders but only a blogger.

Yes, Singaporeans should push the boundaries and taunt the pap

 

[bakkuttay]

Or else how we PAP win defamation suits...

well said, PTUI !!!!!!!i

i love barbarachong!!!! hehehheheheheeee!!!!!!!!!!

 

[TracyTan866]

well said, PTUI !!!!!!!i

i love barbarachong!!!! hehehheheheheeee!!!!!!!!!!

who is Barbara?

 

[bigboss]

Or else how we PAP win defamation suits...

Winning defamation suit is like playing poker. Calling the bluff and the guy with the deep pocket will always win. When paps sue you, who has the deeper pocket? Even an ordinary pap MP has a pocket deeper than an ordinary sinkie.

By using the process of summary judgement, only the party with deep pocket will win in any defamation suit. It has already been proven throughout the years in sinkie land. If you are poor in sinkie land, keep your mouth shut.

 

[TracyTan866]

Winning defamation suit is like playing poker. Calling the bluff and the guy with the deep pocket will always win. When paps sue you, who has the deeper pocket? Even an ordinary pap MP has a pocket deeper than an ordinary sinkie.

By using the process of summary judgement, only the party with deep pocket will win in any defamation suit. It has already been proven throughout the years in sinkie land. If you are poor in sinkie land, keep your mouth shut.

True...reminds me of TT Durai vs Archie Ong. Archie claimed that TT Durai used public funds and travelled 1st Class on SIA. TT Durai denied it and threatened to sue Archie unless he apologise. Archie did. But in subsequent revelations, TT Durai did fly 1st Class on SIA and Archie's friends encouraged Archie to pursue the matter and bring TT Durai to task. But Archie was magnanimous and decided to pardon TT Durai.

We can see the who is the righteous man and who is the crook.

Likewise, in the LHL vs RN defamation case, we can predict who is the crook and who is the righteous man

 

[HTOLAS]

It was a forced error.

Did WP score or was it an own goal?