• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Wp-1, pap-0

this little scoring is just a self-gratification that makes no difference.

the only difference shall come when more opp seats are won in the next GE.

the important question is: ARE WE GOING TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN?

I am an optimist and I am confident
 
Appointing 'reliable' judges has always been tricky for political leaders in a democracy. Of course, the leader of the day would have to see a judge as being pro-them before appointing this person. The beauty of it is that after appointing a judge, they should have no right of removing him except through a very robust process of having brother judges deem the person no longer competent. In Commonwealth countries, this often involves having judges from other Commonwealth countries help to make the decision. This means no judge can be removed by the political leadership even if he starts to make decisions against that leadership.

This new law allows the PAPzis to selectively decide which judges are more 'reliable' and can be kept beyond 65.

I thought to be a Judge you have to be pro PAP? That is why they are called Kangaroos COurt? NO?

PAP:10 WP:-10!
 
This new law allows the PAPzis to selectively decide which judges are more 'reliable' and can be kept beyond 65.

pap is standing on shaky grounds with such blatantly immoral policies.

Everyone can see WP's wise counter proposals and everyone can see pap's flawed recommendation.

WP-1, PAP-0
 
WP's arguments are clearly superior, but PIMP will not present it that way and quite a number of people still depend entirely on PIMP propaganda for their information. So, it's our duty to go beyond fora like this and spread the message all round.

pap is standing on shaky grounds with such blatantly immoral policies.

how can anyone not see WP's wise counter proposals and how can anyone not see pap's flawed recommendation?
 
WP's arguments are clearly superior, but PIMP will not present it that way and quite a number of people still depend entirely on PIMP propaganda for their information. So, it's our duty to go beyond fora like this and spread the message all round.

yes, yes, yes..

we must nullify PIMP's effect and influence to the point that PIMP is considered trash
 
Back
Top