It's true that a university degree is not vital for success, including the establishment definition of sucesss which is material wealth.
But for someone in a country leadership position who has been to university, who sent his children to university, to make such comment is simply a cop out, to cover himself and his colleagues in case there are not enough university places or if university grads can't get good jobs.
While we know that a degree is not vital for success, it certainly helps.
Let me give a real forum example of why having a university degree is better than not having one.
One of our forummers, a former policeman and investigator claims that he is not a grad. He would make comments like "For a grad, he is not very smart, etc." Whether he has some emotional baggage about not going to university, I don't know. Only he knows that.
Notwithstanding that, he can be said to have been a success, worked for years in the establishment as a policeman, investigator and in other special roles. You can also ask him why he worked for so many years in that type of role, but now he has left, suddenly becomes an establishment critic.
Now on a pension and enjoying life gambling and going to night spots. Success? Most of us would say that he probably is.
However, he recently made this comment in the forum, that going to high end night spots used to be FOC for former policemen and investigators like him, because it was one of their privileges. My reply to his post was that it was not a privilege, but tantamount to corruption.
This is not an issue of morality, because we have seen recently several cases of people who have obviously got a basic degree or more, step beyond moral boundaries.
What I am suggesting a university degree would do for people like this chap are the following:
1. If he had taken a professional degree, he would have had to take at least one or more course in professional ethics.
2. If he had taken a science or related degree, he would have formal training in logical deduction and empirical analysis, which would probably lead to better rationalisation and decision making.
3. If he had taken a course in business, finance or economics, he would have courses, lessons and case studies in business dealings, which would include ethics and acceptable business practices.
4. If he had taken any other degree even without the above, perhaps he would have been exposed to teachers, peers , case studies or even situations, where a sensible rational ethical mentality would prevail, instead of the "what he sees being done over the years must be right and ok type of mentality". This would include not only the situations he comes across but also the occasional document or information he comes across.
A university degree may not be vital for success, including the establishment definition of success which is material wealth, but I really think it's better to have one than not to have one.