• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

why r sgporeans angry?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
<TABLE id=msgUN border=0 cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD id=msgUNsubj vAlign=top>
icon.aspx
Coffeeshop Chit Chat - why r sgporeans angry?</TD><TD id=msgunetc noWrap align=right>
icon.aspx
Subscribe </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=msgtable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"> </TD><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead vAlign=top><TD class=msgF width="1%" noWrap align=right>From: </TD><TD class=msgFname width="68%" noWrap>bratsalive <NOBR></NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate width="30%" noWrap align=right>6:38 am </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT height=20 width="1%" noWrap align=right>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname width="68%" noWrap>ALL <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (1 of 7) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft rowSpan=4 width="1%"> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>28466.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>The anger of displacement
Posted: 10 Feb 2010 10:17 AM PST
Lit-up_CBD_from_Raffles_City_-_RGW.jpg

By Choo Zheng Xi, Editor-at-Large
Why are Singaporeans unhappy, the PAP wonders.
It is said that Singaporeans are a migrant stock. Coming and going, it~{!/~}s in our blood. My own mother was born and raised in Hong Kong. She met my Singaporean father while he was helping out at my paternal grandmother~{!/~}s restaurant in Kowloon in the early 80s. And then I was born.
My parents brought me to Singapore in 1988, when I was three years old.
Back then, there were only about 300,000 non-citizen residents in Singapore, out of 3 million people.
All my mother~{!/~}s blood relatives are still in Hong Kong, but we are Singaporean citizens now. We will always call Singapore our first home.

I still speak only Cantonese with my mother. She came here speaking very little English, but she now speaks decent English and Mandarin (though with a strong Cantonese accent), and some pasar Hokkien that she picked up along the way.
My mother recently retired from her sales position at a 3-for-$10 stall near Raffles City where she happily worked for more than five years. She was tired of competing with the Mainlander that her boss had hired last year, who was willing to work longer for less money.
Mum was hoping to quit after receiving the annual one-month Chinese New Year bonus. The bonus, which her boss usually pays along with her January wages, never came this year. Over the phone, she told me how relieved she was that I~{!/~}d be starting work at a law firm later this year.
Singapore now has more than 1.7 million foreigners out of 4.99 million people.
My mother grew to love Singapore at a time when Singapore had more space to grow to love her.
It scares me how little space Singaporeans have been left to integrate foreigners, and how visceral the xenophobic reactions are.
Why are Singaporeans angry, the PAP wonders.
Then there is my paternal granduncle. He was a bookish bachelor, and spoke a crisp Victorian English common among the English-educated of his time. He used to trundle down every weekend to the old National Library at Stamford Road, where he enjoyed reading everything from American thriller novels to Singaporean history books. He was such a loyal library member that the library used to send him commemorative coffee table books on their more significant anniversaries.
He died a few years before they turned the Stamford Library into a tunnel. I guess in a way it was better he never found out, he would never have forgiven them.
Why are Singaporeans angry, the PAP wonders.
If our Ministers took crowded MRTs and buses, ate at neighborhood coffee shops, or worked as front line service staff, they might better understand Singaporeans~{!/~} anger.
If they lived like us, ate like us ~{!*~} if they looked at us ~{!*~} they might know.
Singaporeans aren~{!/~}t inherently xenophobic or hateful, my family will be the first to attest. I trust that Singaporeans can remember a common humanity even as we condemn dehumanizing policies.
But our country is changing so quickly that we now feel overwhelmed and displaced, angry, in a country which is becoming harder and harder to recognize.
It is hard to believe the PAP doesn~{!/~}t know why Singaporeans are angry, but what does our anger mean to them?
Singapore is increasingly losing our physical and emotional space for love, and soon the only thing we will be able to call ours will be our Anger.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
<TABLE class=msgtablealt cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"> </TD><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead vAlign=top><TD class=msgF width="1%" noWrap align=right>From: </TD><TD class=msgFname width="68%" noWrap>bratsalive <NOBR></NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate width="30%" noWrap align=right>6:44 am </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT height=20 width="1%" noWrap align=right>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname width="68%" noWrap>bratsalive <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (2 of 7) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft rowSpan=4 width="1%"> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>28466.2 in reply to 28466.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>had a UK citizen who was hk originally working in sgp in one of the biggie foreign bank holding quite a respectable high post.
he quit and returned to UK. his reason was the FTs here were just too hardworking with respect to their meagre pay. he would love to work here as his pay was much higher as he was fr a "higher class" FT category. however, brits do not like to work beyong 5pm too often nor returning to office on off days or saturdays.
so he's back now in UK and breeding ike rabbit. he got 3 kids and one popping out anytime. he's still in the executive high pay category and he's living life like one decent human being should.
are u working like a dog? getting pay cuts? company taking u for granted? if u leave, they would be happier cos then a FT could fill ur post immediately and getting lesser pay.
why are you angry? simple. cos u r just an employee. with your pay, any boss can get a FT replacement at a discount compare to yours.
if u r an employee, u should be angry. but if u were the boss, would u still be angry?
</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
The answer is in an experiment on overcrowding conducted by John Calhoun.

JAMES L. HILL2
Unit for Research on Behavioral Systems, Laboratory of Brain Evolution and Behavior, National Institute of Mental Health Bethesda, Maryland 20892


Investigations of the effects of crowding on social behavior has long been a major focus of the research on rodent populations conducted in the laboratory of John B. Calhoun, at the National Institute of Mental Health. In these studies, rats living under crowded conditions exhibited many behavioral abnormalities, including poor parental behavior, and excessive aggression. These behavior patterns are similar to those displayed by rats with neocortex damage except that the latter were tested under controlled, uncrowded conditions. An experiment was designed to examine the concomitant effects of forebrain lesions and population density upon a rat's capacity to cope with social complexity. The behaviors of rats with less than 50 percent of the normal neocortex, resulting from prenatal chemical treatment, were compared at two population densities to similar groups of normal rats. The micrencephalic rats were initially and generally less capable parents and were more aggressive than normals. In both types of rats, females in populations of eight bisexual pairs reared proportionally fewer of their offspring to weaning age than females in populations of four pairs. The overall reproductive success of normal rats at the higher population density was as poor as that of the micrencephalic rats at the lower population density. These results have been interpreted as showing that rats are sensitive to differences in population density even at relatively low absolute population sizes, and that increased population density interferes with the capacity of the neocortex to cope with environment complexity.
 
Back
Top