And if we are gonna have nukes, where the heck are we gonna squeeze them in- since Singapore is almost completely urbanised?
Besides, having nukes will spark a nuclear arms race- and President Obama would never allow such a situation, because it would give a massive headache to his Administration. A nuclear South Asia with two nuke powers(India and Pakistan) is bad enough, let alone a nuclear power in this region
Firstly, u do not need nukes. Its too technologically complicated to maintain and operate, and u are at the whim and fancy of countries that u rely on to sell you weapons grade plutonuim, because u don't have your own nuclear power plant,or uranium enrichment facility. U will have to end up buying stolen nukes off the black market and that u have the problem of integrating them into a delivery vehicle. No nuclear countries will willingly sell u nukes. not even Israel. And after use, the target is radioactive for decades or longer, rendering it useless to u too.
Much cheaper way to go is thru a chemical or biological theatre ballistic missile system. SOme form of a modernized Scud. U can obtain chemical or bio warheads much easier, and if they are binary systems, safer and easier to operate. Any number of countries especuially China, and Russia will sell u all the mobile Scud launchers u want. There is no problem squeezing in medium range rockets into Singapore. Ask youself how the heck the Palestinians can constantly fire rockets at Israel from a small area like the Gaza strip, and how come the Israelis with complete air control cannot see them or prevent them from being fired. Some examples of how they can be deployed in Singapore:
- Fixed hardened silos in one of the offshore islands or in Area D/E.
- Mobile missile launchers move around every day, all over the island. They can overnight in a govt. facility such as an army camp, airbase, Changi airport, GEB, etc.
- Deploy on one of our French frigates and they can coast up and down the enemy coastline
- Smaller Chemical and bio bomb can be deployed on 1 squadron of RSAF attack planes
The point is that the enemy can never be sure that they will take out all the missiles in a first strike. Their cities will be turned into a contaminated wasteland from our response strike. Initial one time Cost of this system, maybe $2 billion or less. Annual cost to maintain it, maybe $100 million. SAF planners know this. But why spend $100 million a year when u can con the peasants into $11.5 Billion a year?