• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Western Australia Primier fucked Indians for lying and cheating

A Singaporean

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Messages
15,928
Points
113
The Online Citizen Asia


Western Australia Premier: Accuracy of India’s COVID-19 testing methods cannot be trusted
by Correspondent
29/04/2021
Reading Time: 2 mins read

Western Australia Premier: Accuracy of India’s COVID-19 testing methods cannot be trusted
Western Australian Premier Mark McGowan



On Tue (27 Apr), Western Australia Premier Mark McGowan angrily hit out at the accuracy of COVID-19 testing in India.
A flight which flew from KL to Perth last Sat (24 Apr) showed that 78 of the 79 passengers onboard had recently been in India. So far, 4 COVID-19 cases have been found during hotel quarantine by Tue.
“I have just been advised at this morning’s emergency management team meeting that 78 of the 79 passengers on this flight had been in India recently,” McGowan said.
“Our expectation is the number of positive cases from this group of people will grow and potentially grow significantly.”
He said the accuracy of India’s Covid-19 testing methods could not be trusted.
“We obviously have a problem with India,” he said.
“Some of the tests conducted in India either aren’t accurate or aren’t believable and clearly that’s causing some issues here.”
The WA premier said while he sympathized with the situation in India, his priority had to be protecting Western Australia.
“It’s obviously a diabolical situation that is going on in India at the moment, but it does put extreme pressure on our systems here in Western Australia and indeed in other states,” he said.
“I’m advised that other states are going through exactly the same experience.”
McGowan was one of the loudest voices demanding the federal government suspend flights from India, and the Morrison government on Tues finally announced a suspension of all commercial and charter flights until mid-May.
Earlier in Perth, 2 locally acquired infections were found from more than 29,000 tests after the virus leaked out of Perth’s Mercure quarantine hotel. WA’s health department was aware of ventilation issues at the Mercure but had believed the risk could be mitigated.
The outbreak has renewed hotel quarantine concerns and prompted calls for the federal government to invest in purpose-built facilities
 
The hotel Mercure Covid transmission proves that Covid is transmitted via aerosols which is why masks don't work.
 
pap believes indian
bunch of kumgongkias endangering lives of people in this tiny island by admitting more and more of these cecas
songbo 61%?
 
no masks work but you are a stupid piece of shit, moron

You may claim that masks work but it's a meaningless statement unless you also have real world data that backs it up.

Unfortunately for you the data points to the fact that masks actually make things worse.

European-comparison-768x432.jpeg
 
Mask works to block airborne virus and pathogenic germs in the air.

This is a medical product used in surgery and operation of patient.

u don't see doctor wear condoms in surgery but they wear ones in sex...


You may claim that masks work but it's a meaningless statement unless you also have real world data that backs it up.

Unfortunately for you the data points to the fact that masks actually make things worse.

View attachment 109442
 
What a ignorant! Stay in another country for a long enough time your risk pro file will be different! No wonder people say Australia is a racy place! :mad:
 
Please present some data that is current. This data is more than a year old. Lot's of things have changed since then including the fact that many countries adopted mask use which ended up making things far worse.
EzoE5zwX0AE9I5J.png
 

The data shows only 200 cases per million people which is a tiny number by any standard. If you add to that the fact that most of them are not sick you'll come to realise just how mild Covid is.

Here's a comparison of India vs the rest of the world. India certainly has a lot of catching up to do if it is going to come anywhere near the death rates of other countries.

Screen Shot 2021-04-30 at 1.42.00 PM.png
 
The data shows only 200 cases per million people which is a tiny number by any standard. If you add to that the fact that most of them are not sick you'll come to realise just how mild Covid is.

Here's a comparison of India vs the rest of the world. India certainly has a lot of catching up to do if it is going to come anywhere near the death rates of other countries.

View attachment 109462
EzmwaHQWEAYGxTF.jpg
 
The data shows only 200 cases per million people which is a tiny number by any standard. If you add to that the fact that most of them are not sick you'll come to realise just how mild Covid is.

Here's a comparison of India vs the rest of the world. India certainly has a lot of catching up to do if it is going to come anywhere near the death rates of other countries.

View attachment 109462
EzoE5zwX0AE9I5J.png
EzoE5zwX0AE9I5J.png
 
You may claim that masks work but it's a meaningless statement unless you also have real world data that backs it up.

Unfortunately for you the data points to the fact that masks actually make things worse.

View attachment 109442

Wrong. Again. Call it 0 for 134 tries.

https://www.cnet.com/health/mit-cov...may-be-more-important-than-social-distancing/


MIT COVID study: Masks may be more important indoors than social distancing
Social distancing has its limits, but masks can be "extremely effective," the study's authors find.
Sean Buckley
April 26, 2021 4:41 p.m. PT
LISTEN
- 02:12



6 feet social distancing coronavirus

New MIT study examines the benefit of wearing masks.
James Martin/CNET
For the most up-to-date news and information about the coronavirus pandemic, visit the WHO website.
Wash your hands. Wear a mask. Stand at least six feet away from others. These are the guidelines many of us have lived by for the past year, all of them suggested in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, MIT researchers are taking a closer look at the six-foot recommendation to see how effective social distancing really is.
The short answer? In certain situations, six feet of distance isn't enough to protect you on its own and you should probably still wear a mask.
Stay in the know
Get the latest tech stories with CNET Daily News every weekday.

Yes, I also want to receive the CNET Insider newsletter, keeping me up to date with all things CNET.
SIGN ME UP!
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
The real answer? That's a little complicated. The paper says that in "well-mixed spaces, one is no safer from airborne pathogens at 60 ft than 6ft," but the context of this statement depends on the size of the space, how well ventilated it is and what the persons in the room are doing.
Researchers specifically designed the study to mimic the conditions of certain kinds of indoor "superspreading events," such as the Skagit Valley choir practice that resulted in the infecting 53 of 61 attendees. In other words, researchers were only targeting the transmission of small aerosol droplets in a "well-mixed" indoor space with only moderate ventilation -- one where the air moves around frequently enough that potentially infected particles don't have time to settle.
f1-large
Martin Z. Bazant / John W. M. Bush
For example, the formula researchers devised for calculating indoor safety guidelines suggest that if an infected person was riding on a commercial airline with 100 other people, other passengers would be at risk of infection within 70 minutes. If all of the passengers wore masks, however, that space could be safe for up to 54 hours.
With data like that, it's possible to conclude the study says social distancing isn't effective, but the authors are quick to point out that the paper examines only one method of transmission under very specific conditions. In a statement, the researchers said that their findings had been "mischaracterized by some on social media and in the news," stating that the paper makes a point of calling out the benefits of social distancing and mask-wearing in conditions outside of the study's purview.
"The value of social distancing in limiting COVID-19 transmission by respiratory jets is made clear in the last section of our paper, 'Beyond the well-mixed room,'" they said. "Our study highlights that face masks can be an extremely effective indoor safety measure."
The researchers have built an online tool to help readers calculate how their formula estimates risk for differing room sizes, occupancy levels and mask-wearing behavior. For everything else you need to know about COVID-19, be sure to check out CNET's ongoing coverage here.
The information contained in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as health or medical advice. Always consult a physician or other qualified health provider regarding any questions you may have about a medical condition or health objectives.
 
Back
Top