• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Wendy Chan, self-proclaimed SIL of Foo Mee Har, called CUNT by dark skinned fellow..

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
35,356
Points
113
Does she moonlight in Petain together with Foo Mee Har since she lives nearby??







it took me 1 and a half years going back and forth with LTA and Nparks to get this U turn area...
The LTA guy also took the initiative to make this banner

its a one way road so the U turn area is important...

Unfortunately, the last shop house has some gangster people and gangster customers who think its their god given right that the area outside their shop is for them and their customers

 
Does she moonlight in Petain together with Foo Mee Har since she lives nearby??







it took me 1 and a half years going back and forth with LTA and Nparks to get this U turn area...
The LTA guy also took the initiative to make this banner

its a one way road so the U turn area is important...

Unfortunately, the last shop house has some gangster people and gangster customers who think its their god given right that the area outside their shop is for them and their customers


if me not wrong, she's also a member here
 
Foo Mee Har relatives very free? go pick rubbish, she could have spent her time in Petain serving some horny guy..

 
@wendychan
can you tell Foo Mee Har...
she's quite a dirty slut for sucking Shan that snake.
Even prostitutes got limits, she's worse than a whore. :laugh:
 
Court dismisses mother’s suit against stepdaughter for breaching gag order
By AMIR HUSSAIN
Published JUNE 03, 2014
Updated JUNE 03, 2014
SINGAPORE — The High Court yesterday threw out a suit brought by a mother against her stepdaughter for breaching a gag order against talking publicly about the former’s family.

In dismissing Madam Eleanor Tan Kok Neo’s case against Ms Wendy Chan Mei Yoke, Judicial Commissioner Lee Kim Shin said Mdm Tan had not proven that there was any agreement preventing Ms Chan from doing so.

Mdm Tan, 79, had sued Ms Chan, 49, for breaching an alleged oral agreement not to speak publicly about her and their family, after her stepdaughter commented on West Coast Member of Parliament Foo Mee Har’s parliamentary question on public housing prices on a Channel NewsAsia forum in October 2012. Ms Foo is Mdm Tan’s daughter-in-law.

The dispute stemmed from an agreement made in 2011 when Ms Chan was given S$1 million and a further S$36,000 to purchase an apartment and cover interim rental expenses. Under the agreement, Ms Chan could not speak or write about Mdm Tan and her family in the newspapers, on the Internet or on social media, as Mdm Tan had wanted to live the rest of her life in peace and privacy.

During the three-day hearing, Ms Chan had pointed to a written agreement between Mdm Tan and her made during a mediation session in September 2012, which revised the gag order such that Ms Chan was only not allowed to say anything scandalous, untrue or defamatory about Mdm Tan and her family.

But Mdm Tan had contended that her “paramount concern” during the mediation session was for Ms Chan not to say anything at all about her family, and claimed that this had been made clear in the alleged oral agreement.

Speaking to reporters outside the courtroom after the judgment yesterday, Ms Chan said she felt “vindicated (and) extremely happy”.

“It’s like a burden has been lifted as this case has been going on for a year and a half,” she said. “I hope we can all just put this behind us.”

Mdm Tan was not in court.
Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...suit-against-stepdaughter-breaching-gag-order

So you bought Parc Somme condo with that one million payout?
 
Just take the car number photo and this video and the mofo can be charged for his vulgar language in public.

You have the right to take any video & photo of anyone or anything on a personal level as long as it's a public place. If you published it without permission then it's an offense.

ie. if you take the photos or video to the police station to lodge a report against whoever that you took picture/video off it's alight and legal still. Just publishing it or using it for a commercial purpose without permission makes it illegal.

*Ofc if the police use it as evidence or published it then it's not your fault or problem.

https://singaporelegaladvice.com/wh...kes-a-photo-of-me-in-public-and-publishes-it/
 
Last edited:
Wendy Chan should also try not to be so quarrelsome, it is not good for mental health.
 
Can Eat Don't Waste.gif

She chio?
 
Why this Wendy Chan never make use of Foo Mee Har that slut to pressure LTA to work?

She looks like a wizened lao cheebye now, does Shan that black dog still moist up her old cunt??

foo-mee-har.jpg
1aijFZYRsttKmp5tylZ41wqIt3G6HSAuzIONGyQOyop7FxfSPhKbN1P0yve-g0ppgHtQjTfF_tx249xedgwaNcQanvwErWmLR34hxXYqljpblW-q-Gonp4bbGTH-3PC-pyHEJP5WnqPdyaoWtPWP-cPr2BQP7RmOz-TNV9Jy-lIcySQJ8QZbr0eyDrNwY0Gpp6wpoOeX5YrBk8TvUaj8fOWMQv0bvWJRAVlncbBhgxOcrE2oJuqBKAqbZ2UftSCdPF9c0nWRCyb3YbLcz3-8ga24lYAqTFEnMt2PThF9x1QT4gnN9C5YqCLASMlDNp0n_KeImU1ozrYewvy3JR68uUdK6PwnM0G5KIPjN8sWl2Abvqtg5eNpNfQ1G1SJntd0GUbiqDntRFk3sEd-tcTH15Gz9ydEOaUT4_WFgk-p_rm708tkEZv25pGuhyFMyFGW7I8UGYrbGk-CsvGQlR1FXg40TFY7nEXK_ybWhKA6o6Ty7Aewr6BD_YL6PT_bQQtRLnaGkVS3vX3FeNBwkuBvoGx3YXLZ6b1oUpKeNAcDwVgb-4QTvt6c78bOQGQ9CiJQIKbuQzLLAKHiNvBh1JwlWepD6U1lIRC6Qe3MVo6Yht1WTluUZkny40rkZ8itEqNNrjzrBVWe5_DKlj6W7OdiEaTiQ3NBr9FJLRq3SsrBYENWMGnwlaUOlRS0AoTGjT7I04SRfTEQMF1y-ihCMg=s500-no
 
not self proclaimed. real sis in law of foo mee har
thts a FACT
 
Just take the car number photo and this video and the mofo can be charged for his vulgar language in public.

You have the right to take any video & photo of anyone or anything on a personal level as long as it's a public place. If you published it without permission then it's an offense.

ie. if you take the photos or video to the police station to lodge a report against whoever that you took picture/video off it's alight and legal still. Just publishing it or using it for a commercial purpose without permission makes it illegal.

*Ofc if the police use it as evidence or published it then it's not your fault or problem.

https://singaporelegaladvice.com/wh...kes-a-photo-of-me-in-public-and-publishes-it/



Just got banned from HWZ
Kumar22 threaten me all kinds of things and then deny and dare not do what he says
And moderator say I’m trolling lol
according to hin, NO ONE (or maybe he only means me) has the the right to confront, talk to etc a driver and point out illegal parking....

Gf719Qy.jpg


said he will be contacting my sis in law... foo mee har... (say and do 2 different things)

FwfrwOo.jpg
 
Back
Top