• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

We should Name, Shame and Jail PAP this way.

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
[video=youtube;LRTTPs-AujA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRTTPs-AujA[/video]

Let's do it then, but one condition, you need balls to do it, do you have any balls, sinkies?
 

CPT (NS) BRANDON

Alfrescian
Loyal
[video=youtube;LRTTPs-AujA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRTTPs-AujA[/video]

Let's do it then, but one condition, you need balls to do it, do you have any balls, sinkies?

First of all you can't jail the PAP because it is a political party and not a person. You can only jail a person. Putting a political party in jail is meaningless, because who would actually be the one doing the time?

Secondly, if you are talking about imprisoning certain individual PAP members, who do you have in mind and what charges would you bring against them?

Thirdly, do you actually think that our judges would ever make a decision against them? Consider the case of the 1997 Cheng San counting centres, where then-AG Chan Sek Keong refused to prosecute Goh Chok Tong and Lee Hsien Loong for an offence under the Parliamentary Elections Act. The rules clearly state that no candidates are allowed to loiter within a 200m radius of any polling station. Chan declared that since Goh and Lee were actually INSIDE the polling station, they were not within a 200m radius, and therefore they did not commit any offence.

There will always be technical loopholes that can be used to explain how legal or judicial decisions are made.

Chan Sek Keong later went on to become Chief Justice.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When the revolution comes...
Pet kangaroos will be gutted along with white scums machiam sacrificial lamb to appease the people.
 
Last edited:

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
First of all you can't jail the PAP because it is a political party and not a person. You can only jail a person. Putting a political party in jail is meaningless, because who would actually be the one doing the time?

Secondly, if you are talking about imprisoning certain individual PAP members, who do you have in mind and what charges would you bring against them?

Thirdly, do you actually think that our judges would ever make a decision against them? Consider the case of the 1997 Cheng San counting centres, where then-AG Chan Sek Keong refused to prosecute Goh Chok Tong and Lee Hsien Loong for an offence under the Parliamentary Elections Act. The rules clearly state that no candidates are allowed to loiter within a 200m radius of any polling station. Chan declared that since Goh and Lee were actually INSIDE the polling station, they were not within a 200m radius, and therefore they did not commit any offence.

There will always be technical loopholes that can be used to explain how legal or judicial decisions are made.

Chan Sek Keong later went on to become Chief Justice.

go and lick your master's ball , sinkie loser.
 

Lee5604

Alfrescian
Loyal
First of all you can't jail the PAP because it is a political party and not a person. You can only jail a person. Putting a political party in jail is meaningless, because who would actually be the one doing the time?

Secondly, if you are talking about imprisoning certain individual PAP members, who do you have in mind and what charges would you bring against them?

Thirdly, do you actually think that our judges would ever make a decision against them? Consider the case of the 1997 Cheng San counting centres, where then-AG Chan Sek Keong refused to prosecute Goh Chok Tong and Lee Hsien Loong for an offence under the Parliamentary Elections Act. The rules clearly state that no candidates are allowed to loiter within a 200m radius of any polling station. Chan declared that since Goh and Lee were actually INSIDE the polling station, they were not within a 200m radius, and therefore they did not commit any offence.

There will always be technical loopholes that can be used to explain how legal or judicial decisions are made.

Chan Sek Keong later went on to become Chief Justice.

Good post bro, very good reasoning and logical.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Why do you want to shame and jail anyone in the PAP in the first place? They've all done a fantastic job of making Singapore one of the most prosperous nations on earth.
 

eErotica69

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Tonychat you go screw a goat.

If you have the balls, fuck back to Malaysia and shame your 48% majority Govt instead of KPKB here, you chump.
 
Last edited:

eErotica69

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Two PAP dogfucking sinkie losers appeared... take note .

You are Malaysian and therefore you have no right to comment.

Why you no balls to protest against your 48% majority BN Government?

You must be BN's dog!
 
Top