Wayangparty.com : Please Read and be Warned

[NgEjay]

Quit calling me jacys. I m not that person and it seems u guys have a fixation over who this jacy or johnston whatever his name is character whch i do not understand.

but from your writing I can tell how fustrated you are with the inability of wayangparty.com reaching its objective.

I do noy know who exposed QXP or parade him around, but it does apear QXP aka Bing had had contacts with you guys ( a particular meeting at centrepoint?) and ur association with wayangparty.com does shows a rather evil motive which again, I do not understand.

But do not assume I m dumb and not observant. You cant get the guy, do not just push the blame around to cover your failure.

Fine, drop the nick jacys.

Frustrated? You have lost me there. I thought you guys were frustrated about something and thus started this ruckus. I wouldn't have bothered to make one iota of comment if not for the fact that so many threads have been started on this and the whole discussion has become so lopsided.

QXP aka BHH had no contact with us. We have never met nor spoken to him before. See how these rumours are believed even by you guys?

As for the rest of your comments on evil motive, they are not worth responding to.

E-Jay

 

[scroobal]

Mr Scroobal, time to shut up and walk the talk:

Scroobal has openly cast doubts about wayangparty's quiz of the week and the authencity of their interview with Chua Sheng Yang.

Everyone knows the people behind TOC and Talkingcock.com. Except for Ng Ejay, no one knows who runs Wayangparty.com. Any information will be appreciated.

 

[Avantas]

Mr Scroobal, that can wait. Not only you, the entire SPH is very curious about wayangparty.

Have you written to Mr Tan yet ? Don't try to run away again.

You accuse wayangparty of fabricating the interview, now wayangparty has asked you to check with Mr Tan if he has the email of the real Chua S Y.

Shouldn't you do the necessary ? Or are you admitting you are LYING through your teeth by making unfounded allegations like the Straits Times ?

Everyone knows the people behind TOC and Talkingcock.com. Except for Ng Ejay, no one knows who runs Wayangparty.com. Any information will be appreciated.

 

[scroobal]

Mr Scroobal, that can wait. Not only you, the entire SPH is very curious about wayangparty.

QUOTE]

As long as Ng Ejay says that you have an editorial team and the interview with Chua is genuine, I will accept it.

By the way, you might want to call Journalist Peh from SPH who you conned the last time into writing an article.

 

[Avantas]

Mr Scroobal:

That is not acceptable. You have to PROVE it yourself.

If you have the same doubts as you did, I will not believe anybody's words.

Why rely on E Jay ?

It is very EASY for you to find out.

1. Email Mr Tan at [email protected] to find out Chua's email.

2. Take part in the quiz of the week contest. Okay, you need not tell wayangparty you are scroobal. Just take part and see if you will receive the NTUC voucher.

Mr Scroobal, that can wait. Not only you, the entire SPH is very curious about wayangparty.

QUOTE]

As long as Ng Ejay says that you have an editorial team and the interview with Chua is genuine, I will accept it.

By the way, you might want to call Journalist Peh from SPH who you conned the last time into writing an article.

 

[scroobal]

Why rely on E Jay ?

Because he is the only one that seems to think that your site is genuine.

 

[Avantas]

Are you contradicting yourself ?

You question the identites of wayangparty.

Now wayangparty ask you to email them and they will speak to you in PERSON.

What has this got to do with E Jay ?

Hello, getting confused ?

Because he is the only one that seems to think that your site is genuine.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

That is interesting. Can anybody else corroborate?

The term "Wayang Party" originated from James Gomez in GE 2006 when he told PAP Inderjit Singh something about "wayang" during his minority form saga..

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

I was really quite fond of QXP after getting used to his vitriolic outbursts. I never took what he said to heart, but then again I am not related to LKY:p

if anyone could recall the character "QXP" of the old sammyboy, he was relentless in his personal attacks on anyone who dont agree with him but once his identity been blown open due to his own arrogance and stupity, Bing aka QXP disappeared as he knows he could nolonger does any damage and his real life credibity had been damaged by himself, not to mention the possiblity of many defamation suits that could be coming his way.

.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Who is Timothy Pang of "Singapore Monitor"? [recently mentioned in WayangParty] Do both really exist?

You actually think there is more than one person? You find them and I will host a dinner.

 

[Avantas]

Hi there,

I am not too sure, but I feel there are at least a few people involved. If you read wayangparty last year and this year, there is an obvious difference in the writing style, and now they have video-making capability when previously there were none.

Actually, it's better they remain annonymous as their 'bite' will be stronger. Once you are known to the agents, you have to watch your words carefully like TOC.

wayangparty is getting the attention now because of its huge readership now.

Have you wondered why nobody cares a hoot about wayangparty a few months ago ?

Who is Timothy Pang of "Singapore Monitor"? [recently mentioned in WayangParty] Do both really exist?

 

[scroobal]

That is interesting. Can anybody else corroborate?

Yes. .....

 

[scroobal]

I was really quite fond of QXP after getting used to his vitriolic outbursts. I never took what he said to heart, but then again I am not related to LKY:p

Those were the good days where the arguments lasted many moons and the premises it stood was more shaky than a 3 legged stool.

I still remember his classic logic where he said that airport transit lounge is a no man's land and the vietnamese chap should not be arrested. One of these days, I plan to drop my pants and pee in full view at the transit area of Changi.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Perhaps you may be a tad disingenuous here. Those "flyers" appeared to be more than "critical flyers", there was a further element of apparent political mischief at play as well. More so when the MSM latched on to it.

Frankly speaking, if one can incur "enemies" because of critical flyers distributed, I think it reflects more on the target of those flyers rather than on the person distributing those flyers.

Were there defamatory words in those flyers? Did those flyers assassinate the character of Mr Low Thia Khiang, or of any other WP member? Did those flyers say WP members engaged in criminal activity?

What if there was an element of political mischief? Would SDP just 'turn the other cheek'?

No? So what is the enmity then? If someone came up to an SDP function and distributed flyers saying SDP was a stupid party, I don't think SDP members would regard that guy as an enemy.

Let's be clear about this. Assuming QXP is indeed Bin, it was QXP himself who initially albeit unfortunately and unwittingly started the "exposure".

As for QXP, you guys were the ones who exposed his identity and then paraded it like some big trophy.

Not everyone acts like LKY, and thank god for that. Even LKY would not sue if he found there was no apparent strategic purpose.

Is calling Sylvia Lim a beguiling wayang actress defamation? Is calling LTK odious defamation too?

If so, then I should be sued as well. And just a reminder, I have my full name and picture online.

E-Jay

 

[DIVISION1]

Good show! We must stop such untrue statements about the establishment. Keep up the good work!

 

[scroobal]

Who is Timothy Pang of "Singapore Monitor"? [recently mentioned in WayangParty] Do both really exist?

You mean Singapore Enquirer. Go to this site

http://singaporeenquirer.sg/

This is new planned site of the "publishing emplire". Ejay and Wayangparty are on it. Under construction.

Your guess is as good as mine. Great design and layout.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Did not know that. I see "Thinkall" on his blog. Quite curious about this bloke although he appears to have gone silent.

This is the same guy that you had previously linked your site on 2 previous occasions and then de-linked. This is Thinknothing, to jog your memory. .

Ooh I missed that one, what was it about?

This is the same guy who started the SDP affair rummour.


.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Do you know for a fact that QXP is indeed Bin?

QXP aka BHH had no contact with us. We have never met nor spoken to him before. See how these rumours are believed even by you guys?


E-Jay

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Porifirio

Ah the flip flopping shifting sands master that is that Kim Jong Ill look alike.

1. With regards to QXP, it was not the actions of that Kim look alike in defending the privacy and identity of QXP that was in question. It was his absolute deafening silence when it came to defending people like GMS or even say Andrew and then his strident calls for privacy for QXP. For that matter QXP was outed if it was him because of a stupid fight over a bicycle with the NLB.

2. He can call the opposition people anything he wants because he knows damm well that opposition members do not and will not sue each other for defamation seeing as they have been sued enough by the PAP. Odious perhaps but true.

3. The fact is that however you disagree with someone or dislikes that person's approach to politics, the affair with the flyer was designed to taunt , embarass and to get the attention of the MSM. It succeeded which is why I say to them they have learnt the dark arts of "swiftboating". Perhaps it was pure pettiness on their part but those distributing the flyers were specifically told to seek me out for payment. seems they were to cheapskate to pay for the deal. What sort of people would degenerate and attack someone at his own birthday party ? If Ejay see's it as nothing more then a "crticial flyer" of no importance then so be it, but apparently the chinese idea of being a scholar and gentleman lies not within his understanding.




Locke

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Ok, what about the derogatory "Bahru" title also ascribed to Low's WP, when and who came up with that?

Yes. .....