• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Vincent Cheng: ISA victims must speak out

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
Teo Soh Lung:Beyond The Blue Gate

...We were never a clandestine communist or marxist network and many of us did not even know or know of one another before the arrests.

We were rather community and Church workers, legal reformers, amateur dramatists, helpers of the Workers' Party, professionals and ordinary citizens exercising our constitutional rights to freedom of expression and association in Singapore.

We have never propagated, in words or in action, a communist state for Singapore. Rather, we had, through open and legitimate organisations and legitimate means, advocated more democracy, less elitism, protection of individual freedoms and civil rights, greater concern for the poor and the less privileged, and less interference in the private lives of citizens.

We hold completely the beliefs expressed by fellow ex-detainee Chew Kheng Chuan in his representation to the ISA Advisory Board, where he stated and we paraphrase:
"...(we are believers) in an open and democractic polity and in the virtures of an open and accountable government. (We) strongly believe that for a society to be meaningfully called democractic, interest and action in politics cannot be the sole prerogative of the professional politician. A citizen of a democracy, to be worthy of that society, has not just the right, but indeed the duty to participate in the political life of his or her society. It is a grave danger to democracy to suggest that for one to comment on political and social issues or to hold differing political opinions, one should go and form a political party to take on the government! Has the citizen no voice, other than a vote once in every four years, that cannot be articulated freely and responsibly, but only through the medium of a professional politician? Such is a situation even worse than that of the common man's crippling dependency on "experts" - whether plumber or temple medium. It will lead to a society where only the authorised, registered, professional-affiliated expert can comment on the subject under his or her purview"...

Excerpt from Teo Soh Lung's book "Beyond The Blue Gate"
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Teo Soh Lung:Beyond The Blue Gate

I have to say that it is aq completely factual and honest statement where she was concerned. Her answers lie with the Third Stage.


...We were never a clandestine communist or marxist network and many of us did not even know or know of one another before the arrests.

We were rather community and Church workers, legal reformers, amateur dramatists, helpers of the Workers' Party, professionals and ordinary citizens exercising our constitutional rights to freedom of expression and association in Singapore.

We have never propagated, in words or in action, a communist state for Singapore. Rather, we had, through open and legitimate organisations and legitimate means, advocated more democracy, less elitism, protection of individual freedoms and civil rights, greater concern for the poor and the less privileged, and less interference in the private lives of citizens.

We hold completely the beliefs expressed by fellow ex-detainee Chew Kheng Chuan in his representation to the ISA Advisory Board, where he stated and we paraphrase:
"...(we are believers) in an open and democractic polity and in the virtures of an open and accountable government. (We) strongly believe that for a society to be meaningfully called democractic, interest and action in politics cannot be the sole prerogative of the professional politician. A citizen of a democracy, to be worthy of that society, has not just the right, but indeed the duty to participate in the political life of his or her society. It is a grave danger to democracy to suggest that for one to comment on political and social issues or to hold differing political opinions, one should go and form a political party to take on the government! Has the citizen no voice, other than a vote once in every four years, that cannot be articulated freely and responsibly, but only through the medium of a professional politician? Such is a situation even worse than that of the common man's crippling dependency on "experts" - whether plumber or temple medium. It will lead to a society where only the authorised, registered, professional-affiliated expert can comment on the subject under his or her purview"...

Excerpt from Teo Soh Lung's book "Beyond The Blue Gate"
 

stoker

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Teo Soh Lung:Beyond The Blue Gate

Hey Scroobal,

Sorry to bump up a very old post. Anyway, I thought this should be quite a giveaway for the answer that Teo Soh Lung wants to know.

http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19880422-1.2.26.30.aspx

Since this is in the public domain, I don't suppose this is a classified information?

I have to say that it is aq completely factual and honest statement where she was concerned. Her answers lie with the Third Stage.
 
Top