• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

US CDC Says Wearing Double Mask Reduce COVID by 95%. Sam Leong very Angry, Red Faced

capamerica

Alfrescian
Loyal
I doubt that 5 billiion people are masking but even if they are it doesn't mean that masking is effective. There are always more sheep than shepherds and numbers mean absolutely nothing. After all almost 4 billion humans have below average intelligence and 7 billion have an IQ below 120 which is the threshold to be considered just reasonably bright.

People are masking because governments around the world because they don't have the brains to do their own research. They just follow orders.

Of all the responses I've received not one has challenged the data or discredited the source. All I see is personal attacks and threats which is the typical response of those who don't have a leg to stand on as far as evidence is concerned.

No one buys not even 1 iota of your garbage.

And 5 billion people will continue to wear masks

Because masks work
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
No one buys not even 1 iota of your garbage.

And 5 billion people will continue to wear masks

Because masks work

I know "masks work" is the current mantra but why then does a comparison infection/death rates of masked marvels vs the bare faced not show any difference?

If masks are so effective surely masked countries like UK, Spain and Italy would have far lower infection rates than countries where they are not compulsory yet Sweden has better stats despite not masking or locking down.

Very few people are masking up where I am and it is not compulsory yet transmission is very low. In fact the country is held up as a shining example of success in the fight against Covid.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Here's another graph. If the data is wrong point out where the error is. If it is correct then why isn't masked LA county doing way better than Stockholm?

1613452545253.png
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
We are enjoying your anger, frustration.

We laugh at your fake data.

My whole office shake head at you

Which part of the data is fake? I checked it against data from official covid information sources. Please advise where you get your data from?
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Video of life in Sweden on 6th Feb 2021... hardly a mask in sight yet deaths are way lower than all those masked marvels in countries like the UK, Spain and Italy.

 

Peiweh

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's not up to me. The users make it what it is.

Ya and now your regulars have left. Get it?

I used to enjoy coming here while taking a shit, its the shittimes. Now its making my shitting less enjoyable. QANON is batshit crazy. No one wants to hear that.

Now this forum is even worse than those times I wipe my ass and there is that occasional little piece of shit that gets stuck on my finger and I have to wash my hands 3 times just to get the smell and the stain off my finger.

Come on man
 

kiketerm

Alfrescian
Loyal
No one buys not even 1 iota of your garbage.

And 5 billion people will continue to wear masks

Because masks work

LOL! You would think that those several BILLION people would be smarter than 1 ape with a computer in New Zealand, right? :biggrin:

So funny :tongue::tongue::tongue:
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Ya and now your regulars have left. Get it?

I used to enjoy coming here while taking a shit, its the shittimes. Now its making my shitting less enjoyable. QANON is batshit crazy. No one wants to hear that.

Now this forum is even worse than those times I wipe my ass and there is that occasional little piece of shit that gets stuck on my finger and I have to wash my hands 3 times just to get the smell and the stain off my finger.

Come on man

It's not compulsory to log on. Anyone who does not like this forum is free to leave yourself included.
 

Kraken

Alfrescian
Loyal
Which part of the data is fake? I checked it against data from official covid information sources. Please advise where you get your data from?

Liar liar pants on fire

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776536


AMA Insights
February 10, 2021
Effectiveness of Mask Wearing to Control Community Spread of SARS-CoV-2
John T. Brooks, MD1; Jay C. Butler, MD1
Author Affiliations Article Information
JAMA. Published online February 10, 2021. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.1505
COVID-19 Resource Center
editorial comment icon
Editorial
Comment

related articles icon
Related
Articles

author interview icon
Interviews



Audio Clinical Review (29:37)
Mask Wearing for COVID-19 Prevention—Summary of CDC Data
Play



1x

0:00 / 0:00
Get CME Subscribe to Podcast

Prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the efficacy of community mask wearing to reduce the spread of respiratory infections was controversial because there were solid relevant data to support their use. During the pandemic, the scientific evidence has increased. Compelling data now demonstrate that community mask wearing is an effective nonpharmacologic intervention to reduce the spread of this infection, especially as source control to prevent spread from infected persons, but also as protection to reduce wearers’ exposure to infection.
COVID-19 spreads primarily through respiratory droplets exhaled when infected people breathe, talk, cough, sneeze, or sing. Most of these droplets are smaller than 10 μm in diameter, often referred to as aerosols. The amount of small droplets and particles increases with the rate and force of airflow during exhalation (eg, shouting, vigorous exercise). Exposure is greater the closer a person is to the source of exhalations. Larger droplets fall out of the air rapidly, but small droplets and the dried particles formed from them (ie, droplet nuclei) can remain suspended in the air. In circumstances with poor ventilation, typically indoor enclosed spaces where an infected person is present for an extended period, the concentrations of these small droplets and particles can build sufficiently to transmit infection.
Community mask wearing substantially reduces transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 2 ways. First, masks prevent infected persons from exposing others to SARS-CoV-2 by blocking exhalation of virus-containing droplets into the air (termed source control). This aspect of mask wearing is especially important because it is estimated that at least 50% or more of transmissions are from persons who never develop symptoms or those who are in the presymptomatic phase of COVID-19 illness.1 In recent laboratory experiments, multilayer cloth masks were more effective than single-layer masks, blocking as much as 50% to 70% of exhaled small droplets and particles.2,3 In some cases, cloth masks have performed similar to surgical or procedure masks for source control. Second, masks protect uninfected wearers. Masks form a barrier to large respiratory droplets that could land on exposed mucous membranes of the eye, nose, and mouth. Masks can also partially filter out small droplets and particles from inhaled air. Multiple layers of fabric and fabrics with higher thread counts improve filtration. However, the observed effectiveness of cloth masks to protect the wearer is lower than their effectiveness for source control,3 and the filtration capacity of cloth masks can be highly dependent on design, fit, and materials used. Standards for cloth masks are needed to help consumers select marketed products.
Epidemiological investigations have helped quantify the benefit of mask wearing to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 (Table; Supplement). At a hair salon in which all staff and clients were required to wear a mask under local ordinance and company policy, 2 symptomatic, infected stylists attended to 139 clients and no infections were observed in the 67 clients who were reached for interviewing and testing. During a COVID-19 outbreak on the USS Theodore Roosevelt, persons who wore masks experienced a 70% lower risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection.4 Similar reductions have been reported in case contact investigations when contacts were masked5 and in household clusters in which household members were masked.6
Table. Studies of the Effect of Mask Wearing on SARS-CoV-2 Infection Riska
View LargeDownload
Studies of the Effect of Mask Wearing on SARS-CoV-2 Infection Riska

An increasing number of ecological studies have also provided persuasive evidence that universal mandatory mask wearing policies have been associated with reductions in the number or rate of infections and deaths (Table). These studies did not distinguish the types of masks (cloth, surgical, or N95) used in the community. This association is strengthened because, in many cases, other mitigation strategies (eg, school and workplace closures, recommendations for social distancing, hand hygiene) had already been deployed before enactment of mask wearing policies, after which the reductions were observed. A study that examined changes in growth rates for infections in 15 states and the District of Columbia before and after mask mandates showed that rates were growing before the mandates were enacted and slowed significantly after, with greater benefit the longer the mandates had been in place.7
Wearing a mask can become uncomfortable, particularly for long periods in warm environments, and covering the nose and mouth may inhibit verbal and nonverbal communication, particularly for children and deaf individuals. However, children aged 7 to 13 years have been shown to be able to make accurate inferences about the emotions of others with partially covered faces,8 and the US Food and Drug Administration recently approved a transparent surgical mask that may be useful in such circumstances. Concerns about reduced oxygen saturation and carbon dioxide retention when wearing a mask have not been supported by available data.9
The overall community benefit of wearing masks derives from their combined ability to limit both exhalation and inhalation of infectious virus. Similar to the principle of herd immunity for vaccination, the greater the extent to which the intervention—mask wearing in this case—is adopted by the community, the larger the benefit to each individual member. The prevalence of mask use in the community may be of greater importance than the type of mask worn. It merits noting that a recent study has been improperly characterized by some sources as showing that cloth or surgical masks offer no benefit. This randomized trial in Denmark was designed to detect at least a 50% reduction in risk for persons wearing surgical masks. Findings were inconclusive,10 most likely because the actual reduction in exposure these masks provided for the wearer was lower. More importantly, the study was far too small (ie, enrolled about 0.1% of the population) to assess the community benefit achieved when wearer protection is combined with reduced source transmission from mask wearers to others.
During past national crises, persons in the US have willingly united and endured temporary sacrifices for the common good. Recovery of the nation from the COVID-19 pandemic requires the combined efforts of families, friends, and neighbors working together in unified public health action. When masks are worn and combined with other recommended mitigation measures, they protect not only the wearer but also the greater community. Recommendations for masks will likely change as more is learned about various mask types and as the pandemic evolves. With the emergence of more transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants, it is even more important to adopt widespread mask wearing as well as to redouble efforts with use of all other nonpharmaceutical prevention measures until effective levels of vaccination are achieved nationally.

Back to top
Article Information
Corresponding Author: John T. Brooks, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Mailstop D-21, Atlanta, GA 30333 ([email protected]).
Published Online: February 10, 2021. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.1505
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Additional Information: The science summarized in this article is reviewed in greater detail with a full set of references on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s COVID-19 website Scientific Brief: Community Use of Cloth Masks to Control the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/more/masking-science-sars-cov2.html). This website and a public slide deck will be updated periodically.
References
1.
Johansson MA, Quandelacy TM, Kada S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 transmission from people without COVID-19 symptoms. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2035057.PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Lindsley WG, Blachere FM, Law BF, Beezhold DH, Noti JD. Efficacy of face masks, neck gaiters and face shields for reducing the expulsion of simulated cough-generated aerosols. Aerosol Sci Technol. Published online January 7, 2021. doi:10.1080/02786826.2020.1862409Google Scholar
3.
Ueki H, Furusawa Y, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, et al. Effectiveness of face masks in preventing airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. mSphere. 2020;5(5):e00637-20. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00637-20PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Payne DC, Smith-Jeffcoat SE, Nowak G, et al; CDC COVID-19 Surge Laboratory Group. SARS-CoV-2 infections and serologic responses from a sample of U.S. Navy Service Members: USS Theodore Roosevelt, April 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(23):714-721.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
 
Top