Time to Squeeze Chinese Heads into the Wall!

[Hightech88]

I rather CCP dominates China, rather than America to do so. Reason is simple, America will break up China apart into small countries, and then create bloody war among themselves. There will be no check and balances on America in the world. You want?

Nonsense.

A compelling counterargument to the claim that China would break apart without the CCP—and that democracy would lead to chaos—can be structured around historical, cultural, and contemporary examples, particularly Taiwan's success. Here’s a well-reasoned response:

---

1. China’s Unity is Rooted in Culture & History, Not Just the CCP *​

The idea that China would fracture into warring states without the CCP ignores thousands of years of Chinese civilization. China has been unified under different dynasties, warlords, and even weak central governments (e.g., the Republic of China era) without permanently splitting apart. The Chinese people share a strong cultural and ethnic identity that transcends any single political party.

If the CCP collapsed, China would not automatically descend into chaos—just as Russia did not dissolve into dozens of countries after the Soviet Union fell. While transitions can be turbulent, the outcome depends on leadership and institutions, not inevitability.

2. Taiwan Proves Chinese Society Thrives Under Democracy​

Taiwan is the strongest counterexample to the claim that Chinese people cannot govern themselves democratically. Despite decades of authoritarian rule under the KMT, Taiwan transitioned peacefully into a vibrant democracy in the 1990s. Today, it has:

• Free and fair elections
• A multiparty system with checks and balances
• A free press and civil liberties
• A high standard of living (ranked above many Western nations in GDP per capita)

If a post-CCP China followed Taiwan’s path—adopting democracy while preserving Chinese culture—it could become prosperous, stable, and globally respected.

3. Economic Success is Not Tied to Authoritarianism​

The CCP claims that authoritarianism is necessary for stability and growth, but history shows otherwise:

• South Korea and Taiwan were once dictatorships but became far more prosperous after democratizing.
• Hong Kong thrived under British rule with the rule of law, not one-party control.
• Even mainland China’s economic boom was fueled by market reforms, not dictatorship (many authoritarian regimes fail economically).

A democratic China would likely see more innovation, less corruption, and better long-term growth—just as Taiwan did.

4. The "Balkanization of China" Fear is Overblown​

The claim that the U.S. would "break up China" is a CCP talking point with no real evidence. The U.S. has no strategic interest in a fragmented China—it would create instability, harm global trade, and risk nuclear proliferation. Instead:

• The U.S. supported a unified Russia after the USSR collapsed.
• The West engages with China economically, preferring gradual reform over chaos.
• Most Chinese, even critics of the CCP, oppose separatism (e.g., Tibet, Xinjiang independence has little popular support).

A democratic China would likely remain unified, just as India—a far more diverse country—has stayed together as a democracy.

5. Without the CCP, China Could Finally Achieve True Greatness​

The CCP’s rule comes at a cost:

• Censorship stifles creativity and progress.
• Corruption and inefficiency plague state-run sectors.
• Aggressive foreign policy creates unnecessary enemies.

A democratic China could:

• Resolve disputes peacefully (e.g., Taiwan, South China Sea).
• Become a global leader in innovation and soft power (like Japan or South Korea).
• Improve living standards through accountable governance.

Conclusion: China’s Future Should Belong to the Chinese People​

The CCP’s narrative that China needs authoritarian rule to survive is false. Taiwan proves that Chinese society can thrive under democracy, and history shows that China’s unity does not depend on one party. If the CCP collapsed, China would not automatically fracture—it could emerge stronger, freer, and more respected in the world.

The real question is: Why should 1.4 billion Chinese people be denied the right to choose their own leaders?

---

This argument counters CCP propaganda while appealing to Chinese patriotism, historical precedent, and the success of Taiwan as a model. It also reassures that democratization does not mean foreign domination or breakup.
----------------
* Source: Deepseek AI

 

[superpower]

We shall see the ability of the labour in USA. They actually ranked top 5 in productivity iirc.
Unions are good, no exploitation of labour in sweatshop conditions.

 

[syed putra]

 

[jsctan]

Sg has pledge, CCP also has Pledge

 

[jsctan]

I rather CCP dominates China, rather than America to do so. Reason is simple, America will break up China apart into small countries, and then create bloody war among themselves. There will be no check and balances on America in the world. You want?

PLO Pledge

Korea, Japan, USA, France, Vietnam, Philippines, Singapore all in.

 

[myfoot123]

PLO Pledge

Korea, Japan, USA, France, Vietnam, Philippines, Singapore all in.View attachment 217955

There is a similar one for CECA. Simply change the "hate" to "cheat" and you get the picture.

 

[jsctan]

There is a similar one for CECA. Simply change the "hate" to "cheat" and you get the picture.

In Chinese? Cecas are everywhere even have chinese.....Can show?
But seriously, those ATs FW males working in Singapore, although earning in Sg can hearing them brainwashed to hate & no love for SG, love SG money.

 

[superpower]

LKY was prescient when he gave this speech in 1985, when Japan was about to surpass America as #1, and America was trying to cripple it. History repeats itself today.

 

[k1976]

​

Beekok problem of re-industrialisation as human need time to reskill and be proficient…Beekok need Skillfuture​

​

This is what happens when a rich old fuck born with gold spoon and never work a single day, kick the biggest shit towards the fan…have fun

LVMH finds making Louis Vuitton bags messy in Texas​

Tassilo Hummel and Waylon Cunningham
Updated Thu, 10 April 2025 at 3:59 PM SGT7-min read

1 / 3

LVMH finds making Louis Vuitton bags messy in Texas​

U.S. President Donald Trump visits the Louis Vuitton Rochambeau Ranch leather workshop in Keene, Texas
By Tassilo Hummel and Waylon Cunningham

ALVARADO, Texas / PARIS (Reuters) -Six years ago, LVMH's (MC.PA) billionaire CEO Bernard Arnault and President Donald Trump cut the blue ribbon on a factory in rural Texas that would make designer handbags for Louis Vuitton, one of the world’s best-known luxury brands.

But since the high-profile opening, the factory has faced a host of problems limiting production, 11 former Louis Vuitton employees told Reuters. The site has consistently ranked among the worst-performing for Louis Vuitton globally, “significantly” underperforming other facilities, according to three former Louis Vuitton workers and a senior industry source, who cited internal rankings shared with staff.

ADVERTISEMENT

The plant’s problems – which haven’t previously been reported – highlight the challenges for LVMH as it attempts to build its production footprint in the U.S. to avoid Trump’s threatened tariffs on European-made goods.

“The ramp-up was harder than we thought it would be, that’s true,” Ludovic Pauchard, Louis Vuitton’s industrial director, said in an interview on Friday in response to detailed questions about Reuters findings.

The Texas site, situated on a 250-acre ranch, has struggled due to a lack of skilled leather workers able to produce at the brand’s quality standards, the three former workers told Reuters. “It took them years to start making the simple pockets of the Neverfull handbag,” one source familiar with operations at the plant said, referring to the classic Louis Vuitton shoulder tote bag.

 

[k1976]

400%...... pretty sure Trump's circle will be buying a shitload of PUT options before any major announcements.... huat gao buay lin choo....

This is a naked demo session of kleptocracy