Strongly disagree!
If you went by WP's route the people will see only another new PAp most likely. If you checked the history of whole world in past 1.5 centuries, most countries that reformed by electoral routes goes down-hill.
For WP, I have voted for them. I will congratulate Mr. LTK. But I will not follow his way.
You said:
Confrontational style doen't work it depends on what your definition of
work is. If you think winning seats means
work, then I still don't agree with you. Because then I can say that PAp's style
worked even more perfectly in this case. Look at their seats! This to me
does not work. If you gave me all 87 seats via this way, I will also say that don't work, but may be to you that is working well.
To me, what
work meant to punish corrupts and greedy politicians, after removing them. To me, giving people a better life is not top priority, the rather to get the exploiters is the priority, because if you let exploiters get away with it, people's life will only be worse. I don't want to be the angle to save the suffering people, I want to be the one punishing the culprits who exploited the suffering people.
To e.g. CSJ, what
work meant, may be to give more kindness to the poor, more freedom, I can not speak for him, but that is my view of his position.
If your definition is that the change / reform should not alarm / distress the people then you position of non-confrontational approach can be understood but NOT Agreed. Because I think you are looking for luxury of not paying the necessary price. That is extreme luxury or dream!