Yup I wrote that. Do you even know what Hindustan is? Hint: it has very little to do with the religion. Hindustan empire was ruled by mugols who are muslims until the british came. So are indian muslims today indian? or muslim? or korean? or what?
Haha. This is so fucking dumb that I won't even bother replying to it. I can educate you about history. But please, I can't show you how to think logically.
Sure let's follow your logic then. He's not indian because his skin is fair and eyes are small. ppfftt....
I really want to laugh at you. You're so dishonest. Once you're caught on your lies you try to twist your words.
Let's see your original reasoning as to why you consider gurkhas indians, you mentioned cos the brits colonized them, LIKE hindustan.
Want to re-read again what you actually wrote? From that sentence that you wrote especially the word like after the comma means that you yourself, yes you yourself meant that nepal was a seperate entity from hindustan. Are you trying to insinuate that the nepalese are indians cos their kingdom used to belong to hindustan? Well from what you wrote nepal was not a part of hindustan. That was what you wrote understand?
Now unto hindustan. What does it have to do with the discussion? Yeah no shit sherlock hindustan was ruled by the munghals whom were descended from the mongolians and they were muslim. What does it have to do with anything? I find it a big joke. You're totally confusing. Indian muslims are indians that become muslims. Their race did not change. Sure some converted to become muslims but they are still indians. The gurkha might have become hindu but he's still not indian. Is that what you were driving at? To think that i actually need to figure out what you're trying to say here.
The 2nd part you said that was dumb. Hey i followed your logic. Wasn't that what you explicitly wrote? Let me quote it again:
I consider gurkhas indian because their kingdom, like hindustan, have been driven to servitude by the White Raja during colonisation. When the British went to India, they quickly used the divide and conquer tactic to overthrow the rulers and usurp rule.
Let's dissect what you mean here. Why do you consider gurkhas indian? You consider them indian cos their kingdom has been driven to serve the white raja and then later under the brits. Ok so some white raja forced them to serve under him and hence they have become indian, so once the brits took over i guess the gurkhas became brits then? Correct?
Therefore we can consider the indians, chinese, malays etc as all british correct since they were forced to serve under them at one pt in time. Correct?
As for your last sentence: Sure let's follow your logic then. He's not indian because his skin is fair and eyes are small. ppfftt....
Wrong i didn't just write that. I also wrote that nepal isn't even under indian rule how can he be considered an indian? FYI there's a difference between one's ethnic race and one's nationality. There are countries that the citizens have the same ethnic name as that of their country. This is common sense.
An indian born in china for eg is he a chinese or an indian? He's obviously an indian with chinese nationality common sense but is he chinese? No he is not.
When ppl say indian they commonly mean those indians that everyone sees but let's get to the gist of the matter. He's nepalese and nepal isn't under india hence even on nationality this gurkha isn't an indian. Get it.
You're really dishonest trying to lie and confuse. He's ethnically not an indian nor nationally one.
