• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The Unravelling of RP's Scholar Couple

SneeringTree

Alfrescian
Loyal
Husband: Ineffectual in army, many foul ups, insubordination, overly-ambitious

Wife: Bad management skill, poor interpersonal skills, impatient, control-freak, not a team player, aloof

All the above evidence provided by ex-colleagues, ex-subordinates and perhaps one or two standing MPs. You heard this here first. Mark my words.
 

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Kingrant,

Nope, I don't think this is a smear campaign. SneeringTree has been active in the old SBF and his posts are all with the opposition.

What he posted, whether accurate or not, I think insiders will know.

I think it's time we stopped molly-coddling oppo candidates and pretend they are flawless.

At the same time we must be quick to highlight great personalilties as and when they emerge.

In fact WP has managed to recruit a couple of excellent candidates in the past few months, but it's a great shame the WP leadership choose to keep mum about it. If not, those candidates will be all over the news right now and even hotter than the SAF Merit Scholars.

The massive silence of WP is one great drawback in this instance.


Has the PAP smearing campaign started?
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
Husband: Ineffectual in army, many foul ups, insubordination, overly-ambitious

Wife: Bad management skill, poor interpersonal skills, impatient, control-freak, not a team player, aloof

All the above evidence provided by ex-colleagues, ex-subordinates and perhaps one or two standing MPs. You heard this here first. Mark my words.

I don't think so - unless they are running for President? :smile:

The PAP is moving away from smear campaigns (although not totally). How would people think if the PAP says that they are government scholars but not the PAP types of government scholars. People would be wondering why the very government's SAF gave them scholarships in the first place. The buck will be passed back to the government/PAP, which is to their advantage, most people can't separate PAP from government.

Now that the PAP has expressed that character matters, people can wonder why they gave scholarships to two "integrity-less" persons in the first place.

In fact, I wish the PAP was that stupid, smear these two that way so that we can have more opposition because I guarantee it'll backfire.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Not that PAP has changed its spots but these are soft attributes and less suitable for smearing. PAP tends to go towards integrity and creating doubts about integrity and objective markers like academic results.


The PAP is moving away from smear campaigns (although not totally). re.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Agree. Publicity and awareness building has to be across the board and continuous. Profile building needs time and active citizenry engagement to go the distance.

More importantly WP needs to repair the perception of an unusually quite term of parliament as well as negativity over the WKS and Viswa incidents. Its getting deeper to rub out quickly.


In fact WP has managed to recruit a couple of excellent candidates in the past few months, but it's a great shame the WP leadership choose to keep mum about it. If not, those candidates will be all over the news right now and even hotter than the SAF Merit Scholars.

The massive silence of WP is one great drawback in this instance.
 

SneeringTree

Alfrescian
Loyal
You are all right; in that this would not be a Chee-type smearing. More like casting aspersions and congratulating themselves for letting the couple leave as their less-than-perfect flaws have been noticed early on in the system.

In other words, there is a check and balance in place for non-performers.

I sure hope this will backfire on the MIW, but I have very little faith with the sheeps that's called Sinkaporeans.
 

lancerglxi

Alfrescian
Loyal
Husband: Ineffectual in army, many foul ups, insubordination, overly-ambitious

Wife: Bad management skill, poor interpersonal skills, impatient, control-freak, not a team player, aloof

All the above evidence provided by ex-colleagues, ex-subordinates and perhaps one or two standing MPs. You heard this here first. Mark my words.

Actually you just described many PAP mini-stars.
 

SneeringTree

Alfrescian
Loyal
In fact, I wish the PAP was that stupid, smear these two that way so that we can have more opposition because I guarantee it'll backfire.

Like I said in the earlier post, I have very little confidence in Sinkaporeans- especially once Braddell Whorehouse goes full throttle. Look how much firepower they rained on James Gomez the last time- however incredulous, it seems that overall their smear campaign worked for most Sinkaporean sheeps.
 

IR123

Alfrescian
Loyal
Look how much firepower they rained on James Gomez the last time- however incredulous, it seems that overall their smear campaign worked for most Sinkaporean sheeps.


Let's be clear about this.

Did James Gomez deny a situation, kept on denying until they produced video evidence?

Did this happened?

What are your views as an opposition sheep?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gomez
April 26, 2006, James Gomez called the elections department to enquire about the status of the form, but was indignant that the board had not received the form. He subsequently reminded the ELD officer of the "consequences" of misplacing his form, pointing to the CCTV nearby. April 27, 2006, the elections department confirmed through CCTV that Mr James Gomez did not submit a "minority-race candidate application form", despite claiming on the eve of Nomination Day that he had done so.[2]
 
Last edited:

SneeringTree

Alfrescian
Loyal
Let's be clear about this.

Did James Gomez deny a situation, kept on denying until they produced video evidence?

Did this happened?

What are your views as an opposition sheep?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gomez
April 26, 2006, James Gomez called the elections department to enquire about the status of the form, but was indignant that the board had not received the form. He subsequently reminded the ELD officer of the "consequences" of misplacing his form, pointing to the CCTV nearby. April 27, 2006, the elections department confirmed through CCTV that Mr James Gomez did not submit a "minority-race candidate application form", despite claiming on the eve of Nomination Day that he had done so.[2]

I was actually referring to all the little hearsays that went to the newspapers (supplied by MP Singh).
 

Hawkeye1819

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Don't think WP received much backlash from Low's Viswa comments. It is the WKS silence that has been hung round their necks.

As for the reform scholars, I'm not buying any of the negativity about them yet until more surfaces, and even then I would say everyone has their dark side. Perception of throttles of perfect candidates being rolled out on a red carpet at election time is a PAP gimmick, which i'm sure most forummers can see thru.



More importantly WP needs to repair the perception of an unusually quite term of parliament as well as negativity over the WKS and Viswa incidents. Its getting deeper to rub out quickly.
 

Hawkeye1819

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
In fact negative publicity campaigns work the world over.

Why do you think US presidential candidates engage in negative ad campaigning?


Like I said in the earlier post, I have very little confidence in Sinkaporeans- especially once Braddell Whorehouse goes full throttle. Look how much firepower they rained on James Gomez the last time- however incredulous, it seems that overall their smear campaign worked for most Sinkaporean sheeps.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Agree, the focus was on old man and Viswa.

Don't think WP received much backlash from Low's Viswa comments. It is the WKS silence that has been hung round their necks.

You can't do much character assassination with soft attributes. And they can't release their personal files and appraisals. The fact that this couple has 1st class honours, cambridge, scholarships, SAF and Admin Service, entrepreneur - all the sound bytes that PAP love to use to sell to the locals over 3 decades will be difficult to ignore.

The only angle left is for the Toa Payoh Brothel to quote this post and others that emerge and spin a story about what Netizens are talking about.

As for the reform scholars, I'm not buying any of the negativity about them yet until more surfaces, and even then I would say everyone has their dark side. Perception of throttles of perfect candidates being rolled out on a red carpet at election time is a PAP gimmick, which i'm sure most forummers can see thru.
 

SneeringTree

Alfrescian
Loyal
Agree, the focus was on old man and Viswa.



You can't do much character assassination with soft attributes. And they can't release their personal files and appraisals. The fact that this couple has 1st class honours, cambridge, scholarships, SAF and Admin Service, entrepreneur - all the sound bytes that PAP love to use to sell to the locals over 3 decades will be difficult to ignore.

The only angle left is for the Toa Payoh Brothel to quote this post and others that emerge and spin a story about what Netizens are talking about.

Here's what it boils down to. Either Lau Goh or Old Man (it's never the Crown Prince who does these things) will say: "I think the Reform Party should come clean about why the scholar couple left their government jobs".

That alone is enough (for a start).
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
First of, he should come clean on

a. Phey Yew Kok who till this day a wall of silence.
b. Sear and his dealings with PA

for a start.


Here's what it boils down to. Either Lau Goh or Old Man (it's never the Crown Prince who does these things) will say: "I think the Reform Party should come clean about why the scholar couple left their government jobs".

That alone is enough (for a start).
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Agree on the hatchet man roles but the attempt would be toothless unless TT and HP have been disciplined over probity issues. I expect that RP would ask PAP to spell out what they mean. Except for the ineffectual part, the rest of the attributes are common place with people like Dhanabalan, Richard Hu etc.


Here's what it boils down to. Either Lau Goh or Old Man (it's never the Crown Prince who does these things) will say: "I think the Reform Party should come clean about why the scholar couple left their government jobs".

That alone is enough (for a start).
 

SneeringTree

Alfrescian
Loyal
Chee Soon Juan was decimated because (1) he used official stamps to send her wife's thesis overseas; (2) his taxi claims were inconsistent.

I think it's not hard to find little slip-ups like these and blow them up to gigantic proportions. Believe you me, Sinkaporeans will suck it all in.
 
Top