- Joined
- Jan 5, 2010
- Messages
- 12,289
- Points
- 113
By the ways, VW during the labour day Hong Lim protest gave a speech about FTs that did not go down well with the general public and there were a lot of negative comments about what he said.
By the ways, VW during the labour day Hong Lim protest gave a speech about FTs that did not go down well with the general public and there were a lot of negative comments about what he said.
Firstly, their gay agenda is not hidden. It is in plain sight when all of them attended Pink Dot and when Jo and Vin practically strutted around.
Secondly, there has so far been no conflagration of issues.
Thirdly, the public can always choose to disagree with one agenda but yet support another. People are more discerning and you should start giving the Singaporean public more credit in that regard.
Fourthly, it is we who should be ashamed that more straight men and women are not coming forward to add their voices. The shame is on us, not on the gays and their purported hidden motives.
Fifth, you can choose not to have two mummies or daddies if you don't like it. Nobody is forcing you. And besides such is not going to be allowed in SG anytime soon, so even if you are into that kind of thing you can't do it.
Nobody complained about maids, Bangladeshi cleaners and Indian construction workers who have been in our midst for decades and we know their contribution to Singapore. They do not take away jobs from Singaporeans. Yet VW use them as examples knowing full well where we stand.
1. You have gay loong at the helm so that's ok?
2. Using this issue is to try to garner the religious votes who oppose gays
Pathetic, desperate and dirty
We are more interested in the half a billion dollars at least that has been paid to LKY, LHL and Ho Ching by taxpayers.
Agree on this. Re-watched his video and it was clear he did classic PAP move of conflating PMETs and unskilled migrant workers. Very unfortunate way to slip up and hope he doesn't do it again.
In the recent parliamentary debate, LHL did the same thing when he bragged that pace of migrant workers coming in had been slowed. It was a pity no one caught him out.
First to Fourth... you are entitled to your opinion.
Fifth... the kids don't have a choice. What do you expect a 7 year old with 2 daddies to do? run away from home and seek out a normal family?
This is an absurd and spurious argument. It like blaming the lone player who scored 7 goals in a one sided ruby match (7-80) instead of faulting other players who didn't perform.
I knew this angle would come out sooner than later. Can't stand the fact that these ragtag bunch of activists are making waves, so attack their sexuality and claim to have hidden agenda. Seriously, can you be more original. American politics is filled with the exact same bullshit (common core being part of gay agenda, and so on), and you want to import this kind of bullshit here.
What's wrong with the same activists championing civil liberties and CPF transparency to also champion for gay rights? Don't tell me your kids are going to start kissing men just because some ragtag bunch of activists like to kiss men. Besides, name me one instance when those activists have conflated the two issues together. Did you see VW and Jolovan put their sexuality on display at the CPF rally? You should know by now that juxtaposition, spurious claims, and loaded statements aren't swallowed wholesale by sammyboy forummers. Maybe if you tried this on the Fabrications About the PAP page they would lap it up like the dogs they are. But not here.
You should know by now that juxtaposition, spurious claims, and loaded statements aren't swallowed wholesale by sammyboy forummers.
I wonder what PTADER has to say about VB using the gay/religious angle to attack VW. Now he's doing the same thing to CPF activists, half of whom aren't even gay (HHH, Uncle Leong, etc)
PAP has 92% of Parliament but this CB PTADER keeps marking the 8% of seats held by the opposition. FUCKING hell which is the more important priority to address.
Ptader and WP is emotional baggage from the past. I have no idea what happened but I got the impression over the years from his postings that it relates to LTK's loyalty to JBJ and JBJ's old guard. I will give some leeway as their old guard did provide the Anson breakthrough.
I am sure despite his sentiments here, PAP will not get his vote and neither will he spoil it either.
On the other hand the useless WP don't even talk cock. They just sit there silently and pocket their monthly allowances. They should be utterly ashamed of themselves.
The adverse effects is not on locals alone but as you can see they simply locust from one country one continent to another for even cheaper source with scant regards to the livelihoods of others, and this perverts parish to deal with inflation. Real pay itself is not growing.What is interesting is that the term xenophobia was not used by PAP first but by this group. I also noticed that not once did VW, AA or JW mention job losses facing Singaporeans. This is the central theme of the entire FT issues. Over crowding yes, infrastructure unable to support the numbers yes, failing to assimilate yes, superior attitude yes, but it's the fear of losing jobs to cheap foreign arseholes the overriding concern.
This does not mean that I write off VW and AA as they have delivered on many other fronts on so many occasions and are far superior to the PAP in terms of concern for Singapore and Singaporeans and certainly for natural justice. We can' have everything can we.